In a January 15, 2006, CBS Sixty Minutes interview, q.v. paragraph 16 at http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/01/13/60minutes/main1208423.shtml , Democrat Congressman John Murtha for the record admitted most of the Laden-type fighters in Iraq were just a tiny amount of combatants.

Many nations now are trying to float a UN religion resolution which would provide for making Osama bin Laden and Hamas terrorism a protected form of Islamic Al-Ashari expression, even if no other Muslims or anyone at all agreed, so that under UN authority no person or nation on earth (including Israel or Pakistan's government, itself State Muslim, or even Saudi Arabia) could ever-after move to so much as arrest Laden or any puppet or clone thereof.

It appears the consensus of most world leaders, their own "subjects" submerged by palaver and media or not, are ready to accept that definition...and why not? When in reality Laden and his ilk are a tiny population of motivation within the collective human psyche, and governments declare them messengers of or akin to God, then tell their own and foreign populations call off all removal attempts of terrorists, this affords all global leaders an "excuse" as to why they need to construct almost income-free non-equity habitrail countries for themselves...see, nobody can pinch or stop a Laden terrorist even if they stand right there watching them, all countries including Pakistan can be handed bazillions even though they too just "wish" Laden would stop, and all leaders on earth then "defend" through keeping all populations in prisons or New Urban sedentarianism so they can spot anyone, what, walking or whatever, suspect them of terror, and warn or relocate area residents to underground showers...er, shelters to keep them safe. See, that's the right stuff GOP Giuliani and Democrat Bill Clinton knew to do when they acted thusly during all those Qaeda WTC attacks in the 1990's, capped by 911 and Laden killers known but "unconnected as dots" when taking pilot lessons after Qaedan Camp.

In closing, it's worth observing that Ladenists and Hamas types do not now nor have they ever said going green, New Urbanism, less jobs, mortgage foreclosures, blah blah blah is what drives them to kill; in fact, it's more not having their "Laden as sole judge and executioner" brand of Sharia law enacted, a law which would more compliment support of sedentary societies less worried about progress than Biblical-age lifestyles with the "right holies" in absolute control....so again, nobody in Europe or Latin America or the Western Hemisphere can say that Muslims, Christians, Jews, animists, Satanists, gnostics, agnostics, or atheists are "bonding" with or "seeking recruitment by" Ladenists, where anyone laments being turned INTO what Laden then coincidentally demands of earth.

Many in government-intermeddled faiths today are implying that to be a good Christian, you must bow to Laden, killers, rapists, and terrorists, and so must your government.

Jesus' own words on war are sparse, yet astoundingly non-prohibitive: "Or suppose a king is about to go to war against another king. Will he not sit down first and consider whether he is able with 10,000 men to oppose the one coming against him with 20,000? If he is not able, he will send a delegation while the other is still a long way off and will ask for terms of peace." (Luke 14:31) In another passage, He exhorts his disciples "if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one." (Luke 22:36)

As a matter of Christian faith, I believe that Jesus Christ never intended ANY faith to be a political threat to any government on earth; that He does not want us taking law or justice into our hands, rather leaving that to government, unless on very legal and rational and otherwise unavoidable attack on one's self in private life we use only force necessary up to most so needed...but no person of any of the earth's faiths, including His own, should EVER resist a soul or harm them in any way(s) while preaching the faith or seeking to extend it. Why? Because Jesus' kingdom is not of this earth, and His only admonition is that one had be extremely sure about WHY they did or didn't do something if they would seek entry into Heaven; that is, did you defend in your WORLDLY portion of life as was customary, and no matter how that's done, did you do everything with a sense of working to betterment of yourselves, enemies, and world, or just lip service thereof? Worse, were YOU the would-be killer, thief, rapist, and so on?

Two great men of observation upon Christian doctrine appear to be in agreement with my faith:

1. Pope John Paul II, ENCYCLICAL LETTER EVANGELIUM VITAE (The Gospel of Life), 1995:

"There are in fact situations in which values proposed by God's Law seem to involve a genuine paradox. This happens for example in the case of legitimate defense, in which the right to protect one's own life and the duty not to harm someone else's life are difficult to reconcile in practice. Certainly, the intrinsic value of life and the duty to love oneself no less than others are the basis of a true right to self-defense. The demanding commandment of love of neighbor, set forth in the Old Testament and confirmed by Jesus, itself presupposes love of oneself as the basis of comparison: "You shall love your neighbor as yourself" (Mk 12:31). Consequently, no one can renounce the right to self-defense out of lack of love for life or for self. This can only be done in virtue of a heroic love which deepens and transfigures the love of self into a radical self-offering, according to the spirit of the Gospel Beatitudes (cf. Mt 5:38-40). The sublime example of this self-offering is the Lord Jesus himself. Moreover, "legitimate defense can be not only a right but a grave duty for someone responsible for another's life, the common good of the family or of the State." Unfortunately, it happens that the need to render the aggressor incapable of causing harm sometimes involves taking his life. In this case, the fatal outcome is attributable to the aggressor whose action brought it about, even though he may not be morally responsible because of a lack of the use of reason."

2.  Martin Luther (Plass, p. 243, WT-4, 4342, WT-2, 1815).

"Yes, indeed! In that event [ being attacked by robbers-ed. ] I should be the authority and wield the sword, because no one else would be near to protect me. I should strike as many dead as I could and thereupon receive the Sacrament and should consider myself to have done a good work. But if I were attacked as a preacher for the sake of the Gospel, I should fold my hands and say, .Well, my Christ, here I am. I have preached thee. If my time has come, I commit myself into your hands.. And thus I should die."  

The within foregoing are but a few of my reasons for belief and faith that one is not de facto evil, damned, or naughty where they act in sane and unavoidable defense...I know of no reason on earth why Christians, Jews, peaceful Muslims, atheists, or anyone else would need to bend knees to Osama bin Laden or any killer/extortionist, even on some malarkey he claims violence and totalitarian power are just his kind's peculiar strand of Islamic faith.

In that March 24, 2009, President Barack Obama emphatically stated only 40% of mortgage-connected people in woe were 'responsible people", by necessary implication the remaining 60% then are not responsible types...in multi-ethnic, multi-racial, multi-cultural diversity.

Then lately cable station AMC's "Breaking Bad" has been hammering non stop for viewers, History Channel's "Gangland" series has been running back to back to back, often with reports on how drug people blend into communities and are never suspected, Obama wants a war on terror but not say with Laden in Pakistan, Congress says we don't need a Navy to move troops but need plenty of troops at home, etcetera...on knowledge even that Trinity College annual religion survey showed Islam remains less than 1% of USA faith.

I would like to present the following theoretical scenario in hypothesis, and after same ask an apt question:

"Okay, turns out the REAL reason America is in desperate economic straits is that about 60% of our composite population is involved with terrorism, drug lords, or both. States and Cities tried to communicate this to President Bush two years ago when States Rights won majority ( http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-1955&tab=summary ), but he wouldn't listen. Thank God, under Obama States feel better about opening prisons which will address these issues (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aXwrfdgXZXoE&refer=us , http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=states+reopen+prisons&aq=f&oq  ). See, Bush had the right mindset for handling people at random in re the martial USA PATRIOT act and Federal drug laws inter alia, but he wouldn't put it where most Mayors and Governors knew it should be...he actually tried to go abroad to fight terrorism, even though Ramos and Compean show how valuable foreign drug informers on mass populations, not usually known or seen as druggies. Now, what more Laden simpatico do you need than so many Jesus-hating unchurched, and you know, like Mexico gives us tons of alleged spam emails to USA people together with alleged spam calls in foreign tongues to USA cell phones/homes, so too does Pakistan give us the same dirt re watching Ladenists...man, is there ever the chatter! Now, faith office-endorsed Church agencies around the nation are stuffing in certain drug and crime past types into motels, hotels, and such, and man, are they ever providing dope on all kinds of folks and their blending families nobody would otherwise suspect. Praise the Lord, we're going to be able to stop provoking Islam abroad, and dry up all these breaking bad terror-mongers at home ruining the economy with their God-rejecting ways! Thank you Lord, for continuing to send us good immigrants who know the real Jesus with desire to do jobs for our economy, and whom others call illegal or just next for pitfalls."

I respectfully submit confusion as to said scenario, and respectfully submit for consideration whether circuitous, amorphous, yet ever-advancing pick-ups of evictees/jobless will be occurring now and afterward, regardless of the outcome of the upcoming G20 conference; I have experience re scenario, including knowledge that charity types often are said to help identify mass terrorism and crime suspects due to peculiarity no one complains of their presence ( http://mostlywater.org/food_not_bombs_when_feeding_the_homeless_becomes_a_terrorist_act ), once picked up trials don't begin until all terrorists have been eliminated, and at the beginning of this month charities put up wild-acting multi-racial people in Waukegan, Zion, and Beach Park IL, yet the Sheriff's been busy driving past them, but working overtime on seemingly normal looking people and vehicles.

There certainly have been many "back to work" initiatives in and since Bill Clinton's second term, up through Bush and now into Obama...surely, Labor Secretary Solis will likely be soon coming up with a pastiche of good employment news.

But it should be noted there are things out there which can keep even the best USA national or SSN-bearing immigrants from any job at all...and these things would be credit report header data (no, it doesn't matter for within purpose what the actual credit data in credit history sections was, is, or should be; here I'm just talking about that header data which lists name, date of birth, current and prior addresses, education, and any employment you've had when a CRA checked prior to a mortgage, loan, credit card, so forth).

In 1999, my wife and I were residents of a nice part of Hyde Park in Chicago, Illinois, near the University of Chicago; my wife, a 1978 graduate of Stephens College, Columbia, Missouri, and to whom I've been married since Summer 1988, then made at least $35,000 a year as an admin in a downtown Chicago bank office and the same or better most years prior, and I was, well, Republiservative (I will only boast my ACT score still qualifies for even some Ivy League types). We had no known outstanding or overdue debts, in fact used to have to return "live" loan checks things like Household Finance would send as enticement to do business (some actually able to be deposited and valued for money at $2,500 or more), and were well-known as timely if not early payers. Then, in September of that year, Daley next declared our neighborhood a TIF gentrification area...now come on, folks like Chicago Mayor Harold Washington and Barack Obama had lived there, so it's not like it was a run down "slumdog millionaire" type area we lived in...and our rent sure didn't seem "PJ" grade.

But, Trans Union, Experian, and Equifax then began (and continue to this day) suddenly insisting that my wife did not live east of the Mississippi, ever, nor was she educated, nor had she ever worked in her adult life, nor had she ever been married (only maiden surname on headers); parenthetically, a few small overdue amounts she'd paid back in the early 1980's had been re-inserted as only credit history, giving appearance somebody who lived with mom all her life and never worked was a "risky deadbeat" and highly unemployable...the "how?" is coming up shortly.

At that time and on to date, I don't get listed at my mommie's housey, just at addresses when CRA-generated reports are made which show abodes at least ten years out-of-date, like they've no idea where I am, ever; of course, I too am education-free per headers, never, ever work(ed), have never been a minister for ULC; and even suits which I filed and I won in Circuit Courts against others transmogrify per CRA's into judgments against ME per credit histories; oh-oh, another "risky, VAWA-busing deadbeat you should pass over for ANY job, let alone career!".

How? Well, you start by being a responsible payer and worker and member of your community, then there's this national economic scrape, or 911, or EyeRack, or what have you, you're foist out of a job, your former employer(s)' workplaces are re-developed into New Urbanism, employers go out of business, and CRA's erase such header data even though it WAS verified earlier by their no-license-required in-house "investigators" and PREVIOUSLY in your headers for life.     

Imagine going to job interviews, lease-option deals, you name it, only to have folks pull CRA reports and pass you over as "deadbeat, irresponsible types; if you're so right, why don't CRA's fix it?; we're sorry, next!". Nope, not even letters of recommendation or shopbook entry ephemera or personal/professional references work when a holy CRA header says otherwise...maybe you're a forger, maybe other deadbeats and predators and God knows who are working with you in lies. In Oregon, the play on our CRA headers was used by local Democrat prosecutors who under State DHS inter alia culled residents' and visitors' CRA header data just for such purposes...even we were caught in a "technical, spotted in background" financial VAWA-buse racket based on say-so of local officials and how does that header data look "against a woman who may be afraid to speak" (my wife is an Ulster Scot by ethnicity, and even SHE describes herself in the nature Wallace) . Oh yes, WE easily overcame that insofar as the relevant jurisdiction IN COURT, but the malarkey header manicures live on. Ditto with Republicans in Tennessee, both parties in Illinois.

Jobs since 1999? Well, the usual gunky ones even recently former super-attorneys are shown getting per recent CNN et al reports. Places to live? Yep, mostly pay-go extended stay types, no CRA headers needed (but still under Federal/State DHS and police rental authority purviews for no-warrant sweeps, which we've never encountered). Credit? Zero...permanently. Oh, and in 1999, my Illinois PERC registration for protective services came on ten years out of date stock, had old director's name ex-ed out, I was turned in by every investigator/armed/unarmed/high pay/low pay outfit there is...a Mike Lyons, then IFDPR predecessor chief of investigations, marked my complaints "unfounded" due the complainant's PERC card appearance complaints as if a forgery, but nobody ever then hired me...these days, they all claim I pass all tests, even high-class executive and international level, but wouldn't you know, the five-year history can never be verified because CRA's don't have it or anything.

In closing, again, I've been to so many Courts, Comptrollers of the Currency, and omnipartisan State Attorneys General, all to no avail...they say what I allege IS true, it's just that for Courts I haven't completed administrative reviews, and for all non-Court administratives, well, they need 1,000 or more complaints, they say, to get involved even as a consumer ombudsman issue. I had hopes back circa 2005 or 2005, when TX Congressman Jeb Hensarling chaired hearings on CRA snafus, but gave up when he said even though CRA's admitted 16-40 million errors minimum per year, they promised to self-police and that's good enough.

So to all the now out-of-work, or "neo-irresponsible", pay strict and keen attention to your CRA header data...if any missing, it's malarkey it's for "ID security via mail/fax/blah"...high profile potential creditors/lessors from whom I've legally pried CRA inquiry copies show they get what I get, PLUS a warning that any local address you give is likely fraudulent. This could get in all you newb's ways as all those sure to come uber-abundant jobs will be chirped about in media and political offices.  

From the agreement of social Liberals, it would seem about 1/7th of the money supply is actual USA currency in circulation, the rest of this "supply" being the value of Euros on some calculation simply by USA banks holding them in New Urbanism global investments ( assumed, as Al Gore and Europe insist the world must decelerate commercialism worldwide ), and in any event even Liberals agree the USA money supply appears to be 1/7th of all national debt ( http://economics.about.com/cs/money/a/money_supply.htm ); certainly, Europe, Canada, the USA, and even many African and other nations have been at New Urbanism for some time, with about the same apparent results everywhere ( http://www.citeulike.org/user/PhDTSU/article/3091192 ).

One can only wonder why for so long the UN has had a permanent panel on world migration as if THE global trade ( http://www.iom.int/ ), and why an appropriate fix for Mid East Muslims is migration to Europe, for Latinos migration to Canada and the USA, Africans to Europe, America, Canada, and all while folks like Chavez and bin Laden and Bashir solidify their influence with even Western leaders...coupled with international investment into "green" things like more houses, less cash flow, and fewer rights for peaceful Muslims due to foreign aid-supported Laden and Hamas types, for Latinos on fear they may be working with Mexican drug lords, and everyone else who might be "breaking bad" and throwing in with them...yes, these drug lords make uber-bank despite what YOU think about cash and credit flows.

No, you wouldn't give cigarettes to smokers, drinks to alcoholics, children to predators and molesters, but there must be some reason we have to draw down even homeland military bases, pay Laden types, let States keep decriminalizing racketeering and such (Illinois did that 15 years ago), and after doing bipartisan bailouts to not bankrupt ourselves 20 years from now, not bail any mere people or vary from green or we'll go bankrupt in 20 years. It's as confusing as States which for years claimed Bush never sent money, what could they do but bulldoze tent cities ala Huckabee ( http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Dec2004/Cardinale1228.htm ), with States asking for help now returning any stimulus or budget funds under Obama and bulldozing tent cities ( http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=101900138 ).

Ah! A reason for status quo! Enter the European Union, the French part inter alia of which just three months ago was singing the praises of Obama and his promises to bail out just like he did, which he wanted to do 'cause gosh darn it, during the campaign that's what Europe applauded...in fact, they even wanted to get together with him back then to re-do world currencies to make it work.

Turns out, despite vast European unpopularity of European Union President Czech Prime Minister Mirek Topolanek ( http://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/1237931221.94/view ), same finds the words Obama represented an icky threat to the Euro, and wants nothing to change USA money supply dynamics and global direction involving it ( http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,510445,00.html )...and WHO said Europe wanted to re-do currencies? Although sure not to increase Topolanek's popularity, our leaders jump on board.

On the evening of March 24, 2009, Obama held a news conference in which he said every RESPONSIBLE American has been taken care of with the mortgage fix, and thus it seems any gainsay is a lie (even http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/03/08/renters.foreclosure/ ); by absence of mention, one presumes every responsible American has a good job at good wages now, so as in how many times before, maybe we should wink at those working and infer "let us do this thing with the slackers, then there'll be credit and cash for the rest of us...and this is the last time, promise"; and of course Presidential Office Of Faith-Funded Initiative Church groups will sit pretty on government influence of finances, even if it's just a bit Calvinistic ( http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1884779_1884782_1884760,00.html ) and limiting of religious expression, and there's likely good reason non-faith office groups have donors de-incentivized.

See, whether via a war on terrorism, or simply preaching a Kingdom of God now is present with Ten Commandment requirements to treat ALL people with dignity and freedom except those committed, say, to murder, these things per Canada, Egypt, Pakistan, and the European Union "offend Islam" of which Osama bin Laden and Hamas are the only Muslims they think should be listened to ( http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Egypt+pushes+free+speech+resolution/1387500/story.html )...according to them, anything other than Calvinistic Ladenism, even non-Laden Islam or atheism, is the greatest crime anyone can participate in...and never you mind that faith office religious teach that political officials, not USA or State Constitutions, are the "leaders appointed by God who must be obeyed in their Divine things done as needs please God not men". You can imagine the message it would send provoking Laden and the world by even allowing incentives to donate to the Quakers or Amish...guess the Hindu American Foundation can kiss that Congressionally-approved Diwali 2012 postage stamp goodbye, in that Diwali celebrates the superiority of good over evil, and Laden thinks even the evil are anointed by God to do their things...those government-appointed Maoist clergy are aiding world peace in slamming Hindus and India for their religion, it seems.

In sum, the  best way forward is to let everything become a habitrail policed by the "right" holy people, otherwise by shock police against "domestic deviants", let those actually in the circulation of hard currencies alone, and eat cake. Maybe it's not a complete waste of one's time to include http://yournewreality.blogspot.com/ in one's pastiche of daily news reviews.

Oh, the whining about ex post facto blah blah blah in re AIG and other bailees; some potentates even suggest AIG execs DO deserve bonuses because they WERE demonstrating excellence. And since nobody mentions words like "embezzlement" or "fraud in the factum or procurement", we must assume no official wants to do more than "embarrass" help from execs in ways known only to officials.

Okey-doke! For those so outstanding as to deserve bonuses from their firms just happening to be getting PUBLIC money to continue running on pretext the public will avail of it via their stewardship, on further claim the customers couldn't pay and aren't expected to return to ability to pay in this lifetime, such execs and their relateds should be given whatever bonuses their firms believe due...just not from PUBLIC funds especially since the claim is the funds are to "Stimulate all but the creepy people who are schemers".

Surely, Congress doesn't see their constituents on the majority as schemers against companies who, at least in some cases, might not have been as upfront in financial dealings or investment advice; surely, no potentate would say public money should go just to fill a void created by a firm running short because if they pay out most private profits as salaries and bonuses for themselves "the little schemers" will be in a crisis.

Then again, Hamas, Laden, and Pakistan are among those tossed bazillions in USA aid, so paying terrorists not to commit terror doesn't work ala Mumbai; and bazillions to Mexico for its "drug war" seems to accomplish nothing as we open borders; yet apparently at least in paying them we get to clear multi-racial "little schemers" on claims Laden or drug lords or somebody might slip operatives into aimless public aggregations of jobless, foreclosed, renters evicted due to landlord in foreclosure despite renters paying, and so forth...we know such foreign aid cash makes it to such governments, and maybe that's a reason there's an air of trepidation with USA banks about "ability to repay" re multi-ethnic USA residents.

Of course, we don't even know where all this alleged bailout cash sits, what with so many Palins and other officials all returning it saying they don't need it to deal with their own problems efficiently and swiftly,  or where private bailees have put it, or what the plan to save us is exactly from anybody public or private who says they don't need government to help.

Wouldn't it be funny if all that bailout cash never was printed and distributed, and everything from drug companies to other "bailees" just got to always be treated as if the money existed, or eventually might if the need for money by "the populace" turned to Socialist credits not involved or affording equity in cash or requiring operation of businesses/jobs, or "the populace" otherwise became more "manageable"?

May it become clearer to more that as Jesus gave out loaves and fishes, not bags of gold, and as Job had opportunity to avail of God's gifts and prosper in reliance upon Him despite setbacks rather than God snapping fingers for instant tangibles in recompense, the point of common grace is not funding specific needs or individuals to exclusions of all else, but allowing free choice as to whether one will settle for earthly temptations of darkness as success, or proceed amid those so tempted in reliance on God's spirit and within His Commandments...God knows the world and its warps change around those trying to use common grace His way,  yet won't intermeddle even if those in wicked temptation were to put everyone in a vacuum and nobody even asked for God's grace in conjunctively trying to avoid staying in it...God gives us equal access to earthly resources, minds, and bodies, then mostly stays in His spirit realm telling us our souls' motives for why we did or didn't act in rejection of evil or binding thereof will be the arbiter of our eternity, not any man-made scorecard.

I used to repeatedly let my religious philosophy thinking be clouded by the thick fog "isms" of traditional faiths, politicians, theologians, and media, to the point I almost thought the prayers of so many diverse and devout people over time...resulting in ongoing social and religious attritions...were a sign of God's non-existence, religious and Scriptural false promises, or both; I see now God intends we bind Hellish influences as is appropriate to their manifestation, BUT according to His Commandments and in reliance upon His common grace...rather than just sit around praying; we must act responsibly and civilly for justice, daily bread, and the remission of malicious spirits and those in their temptation, and as well stand up for our own rights in such God-fearing style...and learn to ignore the dark whispers "you're no better than us if you complain we immobilize you, in such way you HAVE to appear to sin in our opposition even if not deadly", as God surely will not afford such limitation of His creations to the hand of Satan...no matter their own non-harmful religion/faith, or secular analog thereto. 

Ever wonder how these largely un-filmed drug lords of Mexico are making uber-bank in their trade despite global economic woes; or how for the Weather Channel for years portraying literally all the USA as in permanent drought, same is rarely if ever a campaign or budget issue; or how ever-dwindling smokers, one in five or less of adults ( http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED_10_2X_Cigarette_Smoking.asp ), will provide enough tax money on smokes to pay for the infinite healthcare of the world; or why Latinos or New Urban housing are but thimblefuls of the USA landscape?

Anyway, the other night, local news showed some press release video of bin Laden, making threats anew after almost eight long years following 2001 AUMF; same time, Oprah, King, et al shown implying American men...not Congo or anti-WOZA troops...are very bad. Darn...who wants to embolden Laden now by say criticizing any official, or look like a hotheaded male risking women and children for not quaking before Laden?

The real question is: why is Laden given this carte blanche to our media without rebuttals? For all the blood and treasure the USA has spent since 911, it seems mostly aimed at keeping a perimeter around Laden's hosts including Pakistan which claims to use him against Pashtun leaders (re Mumbai obviously a rather porous border), while the USA inter alia pour aid into Laden's nesting lands...and the USA mulls a borderless homeland.

Quite obviously, Laden is unfazed by mortgage, cash, and credit woes, and needs no "emboldening" beyond that...recall 911 hit the World Trade Center and Pentagon, and "killer" seems miffed everyday Americans expect more than they now face. Alternately, he has to know Pakistan is trying to say the USA is "racist" against Islam, yet most Muslims reject Ladenism, and it doesn't seem a "race card" to say India, the USA, or anyone else can't see why Laden hosts don't do more themselves against him, let ANY forces capture him instead, or both.

Then some say that not accepting such status quo re Laden will subject us to risks of provoking him, so such dissent needs silencing...and that USA females should do what it takes to over-ride male voices of dissent and bow to the wills of these foreign killers for peace and the children. 

In "Feminism As Subversion: Reflections on the Muslim Concept of NuzHuz", in "Speaking of Faith: Global Perspectives on Women, Religion and Social Change", New Society Publishers, 1987, Fatima Mernissi indicated on e nation run by Islamic fundamentalists once dealt with men pushing women's rights by saying the very governmentally-enforced way men HAD to treat women made them incompetent to protest on behalf OF women even if Islamic law only lets men do so; wouldn't it be weird if anyone suggested all USA male voices be silenced by women, before Ladenists who don't care what women say could be approached for women's rights, as if "no male impurators" would sway them...or suggested low- to deeply cut women's wages, abusive relationships or not, and high costs proved to fundamentalists abroad USA women want no disruption to low expectations for Islamic women, just themselves sans men?

Then again, all the currently hyped abuse themes in media all at once could just be to distract from economic talk, talk as to why Laden still exists, or even be PSYOPS to create impression State and local VAWA officials and clergy are watching women and senior parents, at a time due to foreclosures and job losses families might try crowding together...actual physical abuse is one rightfully actionable type, but historically many other non-physical everyday things tend to be pronounced "abuse", down to simply being in the presence of a spouse or parent without a job, even women "abusing" parents thusly in absence of parental complaints. 

As for Laden, his image could just be to justify keeping foreclosed and jobless folks off most public ways, so Laden can't slip an operative into unmonitored aimless groupings...and Latinos ditto, since they often look Mid-Eastern; plus, people roaming sidewalks doesn't present an upbeat economic scene.

[Editor's Notes: USA Faith office Churches have a theme of God giving financial security to His favored, and taking it away from sinners and non-sinners alike...the latter sounds in fundamentalist Islam, which ascribes prosperity of both sinners and faithful as coming from God; the Faith office must find such context a "security sop" to Ladenists, even if it means Ladenists claim where good and evil are both funded by God, He still lets rejecters of His word into Heaven even if killing innocents, on warped definition of Allah such that we all act as His puppets with no wills of our own ( twists Al-Ashari theology claiming God runs good and evil ).

Iranian government Twelver Shiites follow Al-Hilli theology on that, which insists God has no need of human incarnation to make people listen to Him ( yet does need human prophets ); but refutes Ladenists on Allah, saying: "The will to do evil is impossible for Him, for that will is evil", and "Our acts occur by free choice, and reason requires this". It may be too tempting for some to not sop to the Laden/Pakistani government Al-Ashari theology in some gambit against Iran's nuclear ambitions...does "eye-for-an-eye, plays favorites, discriminator Jesus", itself a neo-hybrid, provoke or actually COMPLIMENT Ladenism?

Lastly, in State Islam African nations not known as USA attackers, actual people in much of that continent historically up to now mostly interested in spiritual healing cults rather than "ism", many western and USA Christians sell the neo-hybrid Jesus, but with a direct injection of Islamic Surah 75...all die body AND soul until some future mass Resurrection, and so did Jesus. Perhaps some try to sop even to Sudan's Bashir, haven-maker for Ladenistic genociders Janjaweed re Darfur, to court another Al-Ashari voice against Iran.

If this truly is the "aid war on terror and economics" game plan, i.e. comport at arm's length with Islamic Al-Ashari fundamentalists, when does it begin desired results and stop looking like a club the USA joined; and is everything from civil rights to religious beliefs to economics always on the table to meet every demand of Al-Ashari "allies" against Iran?]

President Obama has asked people to be more upbeat in talking about the economy; he says the USA economic ship has been righted, and it's time for government to step back and let industries do their thing.

Some actually think it's difficult for the Treasury to have done much, what with Geithner not having yet nominated one of seventeen Deputy Secretary jobs and all those diverse economists complaining, but let me try to put an upbeat face on Illinois economics in the Obaman spirit.

You might have heard Cook County IL (95% of which is Chicago) Circuit Clerk Dorothy Brown say that this week foreclosures are back with a vengeance ( http://198.173.15.31/newsite//GI_NEWS//newscontent/Press_Release/2009/Clerk_Brown_Reports_Mortgage_Foreclosures.pdf ); surely, these are typical of the schemers Obama mentioned, folks who conned banks by taking impossible loans offered BY banks, all cards on table, but that was due to employees engaged in industrial misconduct.

Even at a time many may be evicted, IL Gov. Quinn has re-opened prisons (e.g., http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/clout_st/2009/03/gov-quinn-says-pontiac-prison-will-stay-open.html ) Blagojevich closed, so fret not that schemers will beset you. Also, Gov. Quinn has re-opened State parks ( http://www.shelbyvilledailyunion.com/local/local_story_058174350.html )Blagojevich closed, surely though not as collection areas for evictees and such, but for tons of cash-heavy campers sure to start sightseeing in droves this Spring and Summer, on Obaman prosperity.

Since Obama righted the ship, Illinoisans have all (except schemers) now got so much cash in their hands, Gov. Quinn has called for a 50% increase to the State income tax, and hikes on assorted licenses and fees, while eliminating State workers sure to swiftly find new jobs ( http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-quinn-tax-hike-13mar13,0,7352846.story )...Illinoisans welcome this, and in fact feel guilty they won't be paying even more than this very fair share. There are so many jobs held in Illinois right now, few if any qualified locals seem to be applying at numerous job fairs...and those who do apply mostly won't take education and skill training people across the oceans would happily avail of. It's the schemers who just won't work or be told what to do or relocate (even though wealthy and could afford easily to do so), including women and people of color too lazy to avail of intents to re-make the white- and male-dominated ultra-mega-strong world of jobs...you abroad wouldn't let men or racists keep you from easy money, would you?

Lastly, Illinoisans have such plenty, Mayor Daley appears to suggest they'd even pay all Olympic costs, tourist hotel stays, and more, just for the bragging rights of being an Olympic city; he's asked the State for more Olympics bid money, and some Legislators say "yes", but only if they can get a law passed allowing people to get concealed weapons permits ( http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-ap-il-2016-concealedwea,0,5987959.story ) . This is needed to defend America, certainly not to be taken as fear of some massed humanity say having been evicted, jobless, or able to afford too much.

Thank you for this opportunity to remain upbeat amid reports of foreclosures resuming, joblessness, inability of USA employers and State to find non-schemers, rising taxes and costs, and calls for civilian firepower in lieu of police. Obama's right...how could anyone even insinuate much of news is stagecraft to reassure people abroad all's fine here; or question why the Senate voted down the Fairness Doctrine but passed the Durbin amendment allowing outright censorship by government ( http://www.mrcaction.org/517/petition.asp?PID=18840310 )?

This is in continuing commentary on the USA Presidential Office of Faith-Based Initiatives, together with thereto relevant Executive Orders of now two Presidents allowing certain religious organizations to distribute publicly-funded services or monies on peculiar discriminations, to the exclusion of any other peaceable organizations regardless of faith, and to exclusion of agnostics, Gnostics, and atheists.

The USA reportedly a vast majority of Christians, if mostly "unchurched", here there seems a rise in credit and finance to congregations not necessarily having the greatest members, but a proclivity to "tweaking" the Bible in ways uncommon for at least 1, 995 years...actually, it's Biblical contexts which appear to be morphing to claim everything from 911 to Katrina to you losing your home or job to immigration and beyond is not a power-grab or drift of government and business, nor even of the devil; instead, they say God is "disciplining" or "chastising" you...if you're even a member of their Churches, which win money from government and find easy credit, and you come on hard times, well, obviously you've been a Pharisee in Church and no matter what you SAY you believe about God reading your heart, your congregation or faith must not help you against any poverty or whatever God is willing against you. Yea, for the REAL members, God and Jesus are armor and clubs willing to go knock down anybody and anything as if named Bruno and Tony...say "Praise Jesus!" a lot, quote mostly Old Testament, wear a collar, urge folks to stop pestering pols, look how "God" provides for you.

It's been uncommon over millennia for Christians to describe their Divinity as a "bread God", satisfying your every earthly whim, and taking from "losers" Providentially stricken into all global poverty due to a fit of pique, but there you go. While not Scriptural, it would be one thing if such clergy were trying to insinuate God doesn't want the financially stressed abroad to burden the USA or other nations by emigrating without money, but au contrere. Just by looking at Senator Inhofe's "good news" to Africa that the USA can both leave Muslim extremist Bashir alone and get homes and stuff for Africans, it looks like "Rapturing bread God Jesus" may be leading new Christians to an exodus into a new land with houses they did not build...ala so many Latinos and others, may USA clergy can help sift wheat from chaff with newcomers.

Thus, one presumes the number one job of a USA President being to protect the USA, and all things 911 onward described as Divine retributions, the raison d'etre of the Faith office is to promote the viewpoint of ministers to the "tough cheese!' exclusion of so many, on false premise Islamic terrorists are all poor so keep away from "money arming potential Islamic recruits". Likewise, the Faith office has to like the stress its mostly Christian beneficiaries afford politicians re need for economic improvements.

The within foregoing is my ground for respectfully challenging the legality of the Faith office; through limiting ANY peaceful religious expression to one especially uncommon context, it seems said office operates contrary to US S.Ct. (1943), West Virginia State Board of Education V. Barnette, 319 US 624, inter alia, in that said office prescribes what should be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or admixture thereof...confession of faith therein being a moot issue in re "the outcast".

For those exhorting the Faith office is but an arm of PSYOPS economic warfare defense, as Europe or Muslims influenced Scripture interpretations so long ago, and now Europe and other nations attack us using false "compassionate" Scriptures just to see big business and government spend more than they feel like:

1. Since the Faith office was created, from Asia to Africa, Buddhism to Eritrean Orthodoxy, Islam to Hinduism, more and more governments keep taking over their religions, and adopt the same contexts therein as found here...and they do this in reaction to us, not vice-versa. Treating people abroad with the same "tough love of God" sure reduces chances for our foreign consumer bases.

2. It's not an "attack" to say that much of the Old  Testament...to Christians...is the "old Covenant", Jesus being the new Covenant making the New Testament the first and last guide and filter of even the OT.  Jesus Himself said that in His fulfilling prophecies of Mosaic law, and giving new ways to serve God, there would be much of the old law which would pass away. For example, He says that henceforth do what you want, you won't be destroyed but will receive earthly treasure as your reward if you follow greed to Gehenna...unless you turn from egotism, follow the Ten Commandments, and follow His beatitudes and two greatest commandments to love (Mark 10:17-31). Whereas in the OT (Job 1, 10; Psalm 128; Isaiah 3,10) wealth and material goods (even in re the poor) were thought signs of God's favor, Jesus sees them as false security and says all must abandon such attitude if they truly want favor; at Mark 10:27. Jesus says it's beyond human power to craft their own salvations, but that God may gift it if one truly tried to live by Christ's teachings. Re New Covenant, see Hebrews 7, Luke 17:20-21.

3. To Christians, it shouldn't be "blasphemy" to say more than one religious road can lead to Heaven; Jesus always resisted intents that He, instead of God, be worshipped in any way(s) at all (Matthew 9:17, Matthew 26:63-64), yet obviously used words and miracles simply to establish credibility for giving ALL humans notice of how to act in the then and now present Kingdom of God (Matthew 3:1-17, John 11:37-38). He sees His role not as God, but as an intercessor always with us (Matthew 28:19-20) who has Divine powers to let or not let anything happen...limited to acting as executor of God's will, God having given up that wrath-before-dying Old Covenant...God to Christians intervenes only spiritually.  

4. As to universalism of Christ, while it seems Trinitarian baptism is essential for power to cast out demons, you can find redemption and salvation just by believing in Jesus and doing as He said (Romans 10:9-13). Also, no particular religion at all is envisioned nor any talisman or sacrament needed other than belief and action in step with Jesus (Mark 10:27, Colossians 2:20-23). Throw in Jesus saying all who keep his New Covenant are his brothers and sisters (Matthew 13:50) plus His intent the Covenant apply globally (Matthew 28:19), and it's pretty clear you can be anyone doing anything anywhere, as long as you don't think power emanates from an Ankh/Crucifix/Buddha/what have you symbol, do Christ's bidding, and be as Christian as Tony Perkins, Pat Robertson, John Hagee, or the Pope...no Christian being more or less important than another (1 Peter 5:37, Luke 9:49-50).

5. Despite Islamic terrorists being a small fraction of all Muslims, USA government separately gives aid to foreign theocracies connected to such terrorists, and of which the USA concurrently complains of violating even Muslim human rights, with not even the Faith office doing much to give religious voice or involvement to peaceful Muslim congregations.

It would seem that no foreign interest(s) is or are trying to hurt the USA economy simply by "conning" folks here to believe in a much less harshly Christianity...especially since my Bible cites came from the same unchallenged Bibles the "right" congregations use, and often they use themselves tracts in their own support which were once thought "text corrupted".

As a concluding scenario, some, notably "United Church of God, an International Association", might be growing a new angle on the "unchurched as unbalanced" scheme re the Faith office being of DHS "value". Reviewing at length much of their printed ephemera, they having international offices and apparently limitless funds for printing and mailing all ephemera free of charge to the world, the highlights of their credo differences seem to be that Christ does not want the Gospel spread everywhere, plus no matter what we all get a second chance to so much as be baptized, let alone choose Christ, at the Parousia...they say no Kingdom of God now present was ever indicated by Jesus; they feel they'll get into Heaven for sure if they urge souls now to "practice" or at least "teach" them, no matter their sins this life, what Christ will offer in a "second chance drawing".

The reason for such "second chance" is that God knows not one of us who had been, is, or will be living is capable of following Christ's teachings in His absence (despite saying, after Resurrection per Scripture, "I am always with you"); UCG metaphysics purports that the essential nature of man is bad, most recently in its "Good News" magazine, March-April 2009 issue, article "Goodness: God's Character and Man's Potential". At minimum, such view rejects Scriptural teaching that every last thing God creates starts off good (Genesis 1:27-31, 1 Timothy 4:4) and ignores secular research. For example, in England, the "Daily Telegraph" of 11/25/08 had the story " Children Are Born Believers in God, Academic Claims"; per story, Dr. Justin Barrett, a researcher at Oxford's Center for Anthropology and Mind, said children naturally sense a God, that evolution is hard for the human mind to grasp, and that in cultures where no expression of God exists kids still believe...THAT'S innate badness? Oh, and said "Good News" issue alerts in big spread that Islamic terror will soon engage most Muslims in a war with the West.

UCG alleges offices serving Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Malawi, Mauritius, Nigeria, South Africa, Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia, Swaziland, Zambia, Zimbabwe; only one each in the USA, Canada, UK, France, Germany, Italy, Scandinavia; two in Asia; three in or near Australia. Wouldn't it be something if anyone were implying to "real Scriptural Jesus" Africans of assorted races that racists and Muslims were trying to somehow keep them from houses they didn't build, even if houses weren't in Africa? After all, UCG isn't very ecumenical, in its said "Good News" issue, p. 23, saying: "Today many who claim to believe in Jesus also follow the commandments of man...they worship on Sunday and holidays that originated in pagan religious worship, including Christmas and Easter".

To recap, I respectfully submit the USA Office of Faith-Based Initiatives un-Constitutionally discriminates in use of public funds; so sets standards of orthodoxy in religion, nationalism, and politics; works contrary to USA economic and national security; and further defers to such favored religious view(s) against all citizen inquiries, complaints, and expectations in order to vitiate the public at-large.

Only time will tell if the Faith office next will turn aside "OT Jesus" for yet another kind not derived of ancient Scripture, what kind of Jesus Senator Inhofe et al seek to assist in Africa, and whether same in any way advise the USA is kept from progress not only due to atheists and the unchurched, but due to "pagan" Christians no one from outside should talk to...UCG, e.g., otherwise sells an OT "Bread King Jesus", but is it taught that's where African and USA Christianity part ways?