One certainly HOPES that Dems in Los Angeles aren't still planning to give Islamic jihadists "full inclusion" and integration into their community, and that Berkeley City Council didn't endorse (then apologize to after reneging) Code Pink's anti-war demands just to appease would-be terrorists making threats; on the other hand, it's possible anyone could have hit the military recruitment center yesterday.

Either someone has an axe to grind in their own right against the military ala McVeigh or a disgruntled spouse/parent/similar of harmed serviceperson(s), or is a lone nut case ala Scorpio in Dirty Harry, or is working for one side or the other of the recruitment or Iraq issue(s) at some street/grassroots up to top level; it would seem best if all officials prudently followed up the incident, as it seems to have occured despite State, Local, and Federal DHS operation and thus makes it look like nobody can tell the difference between foreign and domestic assasins, or in alternative is paying much attention to anything at all/attention to anything with meaningful predictive content.

That aside, as a citizen, I am always abidingly interested in bringing such types of felons as bombers to justice and disruption of their apparatus re functioning as quickly as possible; if anyone could avail of even FISA type rules even if it turned out a citizen(s) involved, the goal should be to find the PRODUCT subjects do, not the subjects' origin(s)...only a loon would say "no, don't break a rule to prevent a much greater and provably probable offense(s) from occurring"...especially where ONLY a subject(s) actually appearing liable enough for trial at arraignment are ever taken into custody...I wouldn't assize the rights violation of peeking and disposing immediately of/never ever using otherwise Constitutionally protected data, where mass data ala Carnivore is analyzed to help find needles in haystacks.  

Note that differs from HR 1955, which merely authorizes State or local officials in gerrymander fashion to pick up whole neighborhoods just for traditionally campaigning against them, on grounds "Bush won't use PATRIOT against the unchurched like WE say!" or something equally incompetent for tracking more realistic problems...based on overly-broad: "Well, Laden didn't like apostacy or policy, even if he's like just one kind of a broad spectrum of terrorists most people aren't, and those who are have more specific and arcane conducts we COULD be following if we wanted".  

The Soviets, and to be sure not just them vis a vis Hitler, were renowned under Stalin and Kruschev for finding every unemployed, every needful, and every simply dissident voice to be against the social health of the State...thus, to make the State ail as those leaders of totalitarianism by any names said, these people all became open to say-so institutionalizing as a healing of the sickness of social health.

Now, the modern HR 1424 would do something similar. It would leave an easy door open, especially in presence of HR 1955 type agendas and a sentiment of some that failure to attend Churches on any grounds as same receive State money might signal fundamentalist terror or pro-Socialism bents, for officials to opine that just because someone has a physical ailment it is therefore a sign of mental incapacitation thus the State must intervene on the person's liberty and effect social health treatments known only to them.

Because HR 1424 could easily blur the line between what a simple and in fact commonplace ailment does and does not mean just by its presence, and thus is likely to future Court voiding anyway, I respectfully submit the within foregoing as additional reasoning as to why I urge voting NO on HR 1424.

It was a chuckle to watch local station CLTV this past weekend, which carried a story saying the Cook County, IL County Board wants to spike taxes; the on-camera official blurted out only that such spike…quote…”will create jobs”. Don’t ask him where, what they are, what salaries and benefits, when, or so on; but, at least it shows one pol is aware job scenes are so scary in the USA, just saying “create jobs” simple is enough to sweep you in ahead of all other candidates…planless as you ever are, save for HR 1955 ideations.

Then, I heard about an industry top ten mall chain store that just announced a company-wide, nationwide pay cut of 29% field and 50% administrative; the company says this is due to overall downturn in gross sales, and since their intent is to at least keep each and every employee working, obviously this chain doesn’t feel a single salesperson has engaged in failure to train others, be trained, or other industrial misconduct(s), or is a poor worker at salesmanship. Still, IDES is among unemployment agencies holding that evictions/repossessions/foreclosures/debt unpaid or underpaid are your own problems not caused by the employer…you quit if you went under, or the employer had to let you go due to your new tardiness, inability to bathe, or what have you, once you lost whatever due to big out of blue income cuts.

Now, consider that most salespeople at the relevant company make$9/hour or so and have had 40 hour weeks; even at that low rate, on an annual gross of $18,720 and new 29% pay cut (through hour shaving, salary cut, or both), such person this year will lose $5,428 in income…that $300 single/$600 married IRS stipend sure looks like it can really stimulate such person’s economy, doesn’t it? After all, such person is ONLY losing 18 times the stipend in pay if single, 9 times it if married; imagine that extrapolating through the economy as now even more folks have 29%-50% less income on top of tax spikes, and can’t patronize YOU or your employer like before.

As often is the omnipartisan case, the mostly Democrat pols of Illinois…just like they annually work with OSHA-riddled, unfixed amusement parks and such to hire South Africans and such for the summer rather than spend on repairs…have had rapid response to growing pay cuts: starting this week, area library reading rooms will be closed to the public so the State can hold interviewing skills junkets for first job teens only, and for April will glom onto library internet to train people so low skilled that in 2008…I’m serious…they’re finally going to learn how to do Google searches and make email accounts. Now that’s prolepsis…productively, in a green and progressive way, act in anticipation of “job creation opportunities” via salary cuts and attendant downturns sure to expand, and reach out pronto to make sure live-at-home kids and trailer/cave dwellers will be targeted with neo-online ads for jobs open due to “quits/fires” after cuts…who that’s been cut can really be expected to be hired from online anyway what with their new problems?

I therefore respectfully submit that since certain factors are treated as “anecdotal pockets of downturn” if mentioned by any pol at all, it seems confusing as to how an economic ripple effect can long be avoided absent deflation, and if it can’t why then are laissez-faire or totalitarian, HR 1955 Socialist collectivization the only possible solutions?

Over 200 of your colleagues have signed the pledge or sent a letter of approval supporting the Divided We Fail platform.  Let's move our nation forward by working in a bipartisan fashion to address health care and lifetime financial security.

We can't wait - the time to address these problems is now.  I hope you'll signal your agreement by signing onto the Divided We Fail pledge today.  If you have already agreed to support the Divided We Fail goals, I hope you'll urge your colleagues to do the same.

If you want to learn more about this important effort, visit  www.dividedwefail.org.

Thank you for your time and efforts.  I look forward to hearing from you in regard to Divided We Fail and whether or not you have signed the Congressional Pledge."

But it seems to work this way: there is a bipartisan "agreement" to always refer to the same myth that the USA military-industrial-economic edifice is never less competent than it was in the 1960's; all things then flow as politics therefrom.

Under that myth, the main Democrat party has largely dropped all religious expression from its repertoire, focusing on what passes as racial equality…everything for them then re social justice is a simple question of just not "having racists of one kind or combination keep out foreign born and people of color", while in non-religious ways people can strive or be compelled to do better where racism is "eliminated" for them ; alternatively, the main GOP party has swept up religious expressions, and allows itself to be called a party of say racists, "Uncle Toms", and "Tios Tomas" under guise their faith-based humility causes them to refrain from much address of such charges…in their rhetoric simply following personal responsibility meaning that if you are left with only nominal at best educational and other experience together with only rocks and air, God will forever sustain you, no more need be done…He will surely eventually lead you somewhere better.

This makes religions sound like Marx and Feuerbach were correct in asserting religion merely supports property ownership interests and capitalist "tops" thereof, making ANY outreach effort suspect by the general population; further, use of such composite mythology affords some opportunity to claim, say, that if a Church on one hand takes up social justice issues they take a Democrat-dibbed sound so shut up, you Holy Pols or get taxed away; yet if say a Church espouses right to life some may clamor same sounds in GOP-dibbed politics so again, shut up or else.

Certainly many faiths have realized such Catch-22s, and exhort their followers to then contact elected representatives to express what their faith-informed consciences cause them to offer as respectful comment of electorate members. But both sides of the political coin are ready for that, too.

In such regard, parallel inferences abound as a constant and broad-spectrum de-incentive to the general public. For instance, note how one day "shooter X" or "missing policeman's wife X" or such are all you find as 24/7 reporting, as if to say there's something wrong with media consumers who not only doubt the industrial-military myths, but also doubt nothing more important could possibly exist that's at least equally important to the reported allegations allowed. That is, media…parenthetically shrinking every day in terms of outlets…marginalizes all those not content to believe that media is presenting a maximum comprehensive concern café of issues relevant to the clear majority of people; within all such marginalization, it becomes inferred by media, politicians, or both that anyone who by remotest and flimsiest parallel "fits perp X's profile before the deed(s)" would be "of interest" to authorities, perhaps easier to find if they didn't drop all other concerns for the anointed story(ies) du jour...or claimed NO opinion. Some take this a step further still, in saying easily manipulated email related things could themselves be of interest against a party even if at trial it would not be, and no investigation into the at best hearsay (email or otherwise) quality of "some evidence" need be done before slamming a person…really, how many would want to risk such troubles through even opening their mouths to breathe, even with the most innocent of intentions?

All of this seems to leave most people with at best an impression religions have nothing to offer them, and that the 2008 electoral choice will be status quo wherein States and Towns administer all under USA PATRIOT and State aider laws inter alia,  or status quo wherein States and Towns administer all as usual only with mere admission via HR 1955-type law(s) that yes, States and Towns really weren't made to do anything by mean old GOPer's. Yet even that's a false assumption; e.g., Democrats want to unseat their own Dennis Kucinich grounds he doesn't "do much for little guy interests", yet the only thing different now is that Dennis opposed HR 1955 proposed by Democrats and saying it would just stifle free speech; it's not really even just a choice between the Dems or GOP having their hand on the same wheel as usual, as even Dems and GOP within their ranks genuinely have different opinions.

Based on my layman perceptions, I do support the spirit of the IRS and FEC insofar as restricting endorsement or hat-passing re a party or candidate; but I support every religion's right to make Thomas Acquinas nature comparisons of the pluses and minuses of events common to all, since it impossible for one or another political party or candidate to "copyright" human nature or analysis thereof…I don't find God a partisan in the political sense, so those of any faith(s) peaceably and traditionally trying to evangelize His intentions toward making better free will and choices persons and citizens, making us all on earth more aware of our rights and responsibilities toward each other, and minimizing reliance upon division(s), ought not be threatened by public or private action disruption(s) just for said described evangelization.

Man oh man, I knowed them thar Dimmicrits loved me to eternity! They got them thar Bushies in House contempt nows, acuz they ain't givin' Dimmicrits any hep in a findin' iffn them thar US Attornies wuz a fired fer political reasons or not...yessir, that is what shows you Dimmicrits SHOULD displace God and take over fer 'em: they's real good at just slappin' folks around til they gets what they wants, and just that standing up to violently at least SLAP will ketch mah attenshun and sing alleyooyah to Obama, Lady Hillary, or whatever slapper-arounder Komrade Kommisar No Trail tells us won...yessir, we uns out hyar is just lowbrow cretins a-wantin ta join up with slapper-rounders who'll keep it in-house and tell ferreners we's jus' last man standin hyar twixt ussins....yeeeeaaaarrrrrrgggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!

I'm sorry I'm not like one of say Rep. Bean's (D-IL) activists, basing my opinions merely on what Soros-crowd media say as the only pondered dynamics on FISA and such; I do apologize to Democrats for using informed objectivity and knowledge of subject matters directly before opening my Conservative yap, and for not seeing why say picking on Bush alone is an absolution re saying ANYTHING else further than the idling but purring 2007 Democrat Congressional pastiche polling very low itself.

That said, I continue to support the opinions of President George Walker Bush in re the war on terror.
 
Wherefore, I perceive anyone knowingly aiding the violence goals or propaganda of jihadists of ANY nature, or of AUMF or War Articles objectives, or both, should be not only cut off from Federal funds, but have all their known assets seized so as to immobilize them from funding things directly or indirectly...and always with their hope our citizens and military WILL suffer at such enemy hands. Alternatively, proper official proceedings should be had against such officials of any level wherever any such aider(s) of such enemy(ies) lies directly or tacitly.