About Me

Name: Republiservative
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

If Only Bush Slammed ALL Bad Pols And Foreign Leaders Like His Own Opponents.

Man, if Bush slammed all folks poked at invidiously, Pakistan might have been called a partner in State terrorism, rather than Bush's best buddy in fighting the real terrorists as seen in...and known only to ... the minds of folks like Bush and Mushareff; if Bush moved like the new sheriff in town tellin' you whut, there wouldn't be a pol from Blago to DeLay or a company from Enron to cruddy credit reporters who'd have dared muck up anything.
I know it's so compelling to some to demand controversy and the downfall and total stoppage of implementation of ANYTHING Obama or a Democrat Congress will do...in fact, neocon sites are emailing me today to announce renewed Court efforts to say Obama or anyone else with a State or County abstract of a vital record has no proof of citizenship or any rights thereof; same goes for being called "married", an odd position for those obsessed with opposing same-sex marriage; maybe they just mean people they approve of or deign necessary should be allowed to live here or be married or reproduce, period.
 
But whooping up that the world BETTER assume facts not in evidence against Blagojevich because, you see, GOP always WANTED to do right by everyone but the DEMOCRAT culture of corruption stopped them (for eight years mind you, plus what COULD DeLay and Bush pals do but try to out-lucre Dems, one supposes as GOP counterpoint); whooping up that you're GOING to make people hate Obama as a non-Calvinist-ordained member of society, and by extension making renditionable anybody with a State abstract; and saying the words of GOP and supportive neocons BETTER be enough for you to sidestep trials if they accuse you...what great theatre, but does all that "venting allowed to the common prole masses" actually change ANYTHING?
 
It's good to know that in the opinion of Bush, Rod Blagojevich is the sole and exclusively corrupt leader of all the globe's evils, including terrorism and the election of an "enemy alien" as President, and has caused everyone from Tom DeLay to Andy Mckenna's corporate sponsors to Enron to whatever you readers don't like...see, THAT's why Bush HASN'T possibly renditioned properly, over-detained, whatever, because he and his foreign allies in the war on terror have been doing right due to their primary duty to distribute wealth and even mere social equity as God intended...durn Democrats, and ask Office Of Faith-Based Initiative USA interfaith clergy or clergy abroad appointed by governments after properly jailing complaining clergy if you doubt neocons, it is those Dems who are and lead nothing but "vessels of wrath" whom God creates just for the fun of watching do good while suffering then going to perdition anyway.
 
Unless there's another reason(s) Bush wants to "pre-emptively" pardon all current and former Cabinet members "in case" they committed gross abuses in the war on terror, but while he's doing stuff like that, could we all please pretend Rod Blagojevich is the thumbs down to any changes contemplated by Obama or Democrats.
 
As a traditional Conservative who doesn't get this Neocon media-go-round steamroller brand of politics, I don't think Blagojevich should resign until proven guilty by Court-admissable FACTS; perhaps he could just be deemed under such disability that pending the Lieutenant Governor could take over duties. And I don't see how flagrantly telling Democrats to shut up for good, while telling the public no more need be done to fix anything other than shutting Democrats up from even daring changes for a few years, are the only things Americans or anyone else need talk or think about besides Blagojevich.
 
After all, where everyone is corrupt, only then someone from the swamp COULD dare to change; GOP failed to deliver with a President and majority of both Houses, why NOT let Obama and a Democrat Congress try?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Illinois Democrat Rod Blagojevich: Innocent Until Proven Guilty.

USA media today seem abuzz with news that the U.S. Attorney has arrested Illinois Rod Blagojevich (D) on charges of attempting to sell the Obama vacancy and refusing to use State money to bail out the Chicago Tribune (which, until its recent endorsement of Obama, was known for decades as THE Midwestern Republican paper); Illinois GOP Chair Andy McKenna was shown locally insisting the Governor should resign immediately due to being charged; CNN legal analyst Jeff Toobin this morning said the Senate WILL refuse to seat any Senator Blagojevich names, if any, to the Obama vacancy.

 

Well, there certainly has been a lot of claptrap about Rod, yet to date not even the Illinois GOP would say there was reason to use the State Constitution’s paragraphs about easy impeachment…at ANY prior time…against him.

 

Next, Andy McKenna back in the Summer of 2005 was cited in the Tribune and central Illinois Pantograph, inter alia, as offering $10,000 to anybody who would say Mayor Daley was a corrupt crook AND had legal proof of it…no known takers, ever, so McKenna could be taken now as just doing what comes naturally in his type of position.

 

Then there’s the fact that U.S. Attorney Fitzgerald himself has said Blagojevich’s arrest does NOT stem from a grand jury indictment, just some apparent “ex rel” upon third party complaint(s); surely, Fitzgerald WILL seek to back up his case by seeking an indictment on those charges, won’t he? I mean, as if the Governor had ever been a flight risk in the first place.

 

Looking at this, and I doubt the US Attorney would be grabbing camera time if he didn’t want us to, I find it so far that Mr. Fitzgerald dittos the ILGOP in finding nothing else of which Blagojevich could properly be accused of initiating, nor any other party(ies) then benefiting from all prior past alleged corruptions; in that the DOJ hasn’t denied it will fire U.S. Attorneys who aren’t GOP-partisan friendly, one has to assume what otherwise has passed in Rod’s tenure has been to the absolute satisfaction of the White House. Thus, there’s no true “Blago baggage” clinging to today’s histrionics…nor to Obama, now that it’s kosher to say he IS a USA national by birth.

 

The Tribune non-bailout is easy…why SHOULD any government bail out anything nobody can afford to buy (or cares to), without counting in the bailout of customers, employees, or both? THAT would be “offensive” to the moral character of USA government?

 

Now let’s say the Governor, obviously fully cognizant of Bush eyes from at least the time Obama announced candidacy, wanted to test the ease with which some Senatorial or other appointee(s) would succumb to pressure or temptations, only with eye toward crossing off the list any name(s) even coyly open to same? Um, even BUSH would try to fish out such data from his own as Governor and later President…wouldn’t he? One hopes more than “word-against-word” at the flat level will surface, the kind of necessary meat that SHOULD be present in a charge which…if heard unanswered by a grand jury…would leave little doubt as to guilt; after all, the White House wouldn’t just say hold someone indefinitely without trial or release after a flashy news grab, would it?

 

As to the CNN comment the Senate will not seat anybody Rod might appoint, why? Isn’t it a staple of USA law and Constitutional practice that absolutely every person charged for absolutely any crime(s), via indictment or ex rel, is absolutely innocent until proven guilty?

 

So no, I’m still not an un-American…IF Rod or anyone else appears to truly have done anything, follow procedures of a relevant prosecutorial office, allow them discovery, schedule them for a reasonably swift trial, and do not say they are guilty until they admit it or a Court or jury finds them guilty…and yes, even Rod Blagojevich is entitled to Constitutional handling, as those words must apply to everyone or they mean nothing for anyone.

 

Let’s hope it’s more than Fitzgerald hoping to keep his job despite DOJ partisanship problems already existent and over which Attorney General Gonzales resigned, or just another sop to neocons in reassurance change from the present socio-economic management protocols will be fought hard.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Don't Let Neocon-Backed Clergy Tug Obama Too Much Re "USA Must Bail WORLD Out First".

Man, no sooner does SCOTUS let stand that Obama IS a USA national, than the next Neocon sluggers are up.
 
Right now, groups such as "One" (short for "one sermon", and comprised of not less than Muslim, Christian, and Jewish clergy all amazingly doing well with governments fundings globally and in-step with apparent Office of Faith-Based Initiatives Calvinisms) are massing e-petitions, inter alia, to push Obama to immediately fund every nation's "sick child" bill, no questions asked, upon inauguration; as best as one can tell, it seems God and the whole non-USA will see America as child-haters and rich racists blah blah blah unless we all do what the faith-funded tell us...even if for decades, their "unchurched" have been in reaction to this or that "God loves who I say, will burn whoever I point to" Calvinism. 
 
Of course, every puppet is capable only of speaking as its manipulator wishes; see, like in Pakistan, sure ya get aid from China, the USA, man in the moon, but gosh ding-dang-darn it, it's so hard for many leaders to actually use it to do anything but line their pockets and never get the aid to their people...to which, on top of that lucre, many say "you go to the USA and be taken care of, then, and if they don't it's the USA who wants you to die or whatever".
 
Um, been there, done that; we can't all just add that mindset to the pile ala assuming sure Suze Orman and others constantly miss mortgage snafus and Enrons in re advising VIEWERS, but maybe if we keep listening and doing long enough.... .
 
I mean, what...should these children perhaps be separated from adult family relatives, perhaps put in a large enclave, because it's too much to ask any nation on earth actually be able to provide an income opportunity for adults?
 
If that's the nature of such heart string pullings, "mein clergy, vonce it vas 'Damen und Kindern Links, Menschen Rechts', so vere should ve put ze parents, ja?". Oh, and what about accountability for all that Western aid given to so many same-face leaders already...what, are they going to invest in the prisons or health companies tending an aimless global population?
 
I believe that Obama will bend ear more to non-Calvinists insofar as faiths, and in any secular event can do a better job than that on health care...let's not rush to corner Obama or anyone else on re-heated, re-hashed stylings of "compassionate neo-conservatism".
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Time To Admit Very Few USA Immigrants Are "Illegal".

Yes, I am a Conservative; yes, in the past, I have opposed illegal immigrant amnesty; no, I don't think the USA or any nation on earth should just wave in anybody simply because they showed up or, as in the case of Andrew Luster (q.v., Mexico vs. "Dog" Chapman), lammed out of their own land after high crime conviction but at least brought folding cash with them.
However, as I've tried repeatedly for the past eight years to no avail, I always maintain there CANNOT be THAT many actually illegal immigrants present in the USA at any given time, in that no matter where they came from, they were provided instant infusion into New Urban lifestyles...with buildings, funds, credits, and labor/job protocols specifically designed to produce such end.
 
Clearly, anyone here at all...USA nationals with but one of those common abstracts Counties give re birth and marriage certificates, or in fact any person regardless of origin or status...who is receiving food stamps, USA Social Security, or otherwise participating in government-backed or designed modern USA society, cannot deemed to be here illegally or part(s) of a population no government layer has to respect or deem fit for interactive government representation.
 
Wherefore, I continue to support non-amnesty to those relatively few just expecting "gimme/let me run out with it" pipe dream service or to escape ACTUAL high crime punishment, after TRUE process of a nation's laws; however, I cannot support the current Neocon position that we should INFER all people even Neocons bring here re within aforesaid modern normative purposes are in the least bit "illegal".
 
To do otherwise, now THAT would sound like pure totalism: bring folks in, arrange equity-free, non-participating communities for them, then tell everyone it's part of some "race war" or "Socialization by Democrats" or "never-ending aid to fight trans-hemispheric terrorists" so that subjects feel isolated, and all others are led to believe THEY will be "re-empowered" is they treat newcomers in racist, xenophobic, or nationalistic ways...as they themselves then actually sink while the voices they listened to go on and on.
 
Again, things are as they are today, and the comprehensive situation of every person in the USA should be adressed only within the Constitution...that is, eveyone welcomed by Neocons or others into the semblance of society should necessarily enjoy all the priviliges of such society.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why This Conservative Supports Return To Fairness Doctrine.

The barrage of Conservative and non-RNC GOP email PSAs continues: today, I'm told Obama will be challenged on citizenship by still more front Neocon groups, these groups (e.g., Family Research Council)also say Obama's Cabinet is "Mosaic of colors but not ideas", Townhall Spotlight running ads for folks hawking "Comrade Obama/USSA" bumper stickers, on and on and on it goes; and to think, "ferrener Comrade Obama" voted with Bush on most voting occasions, but Kommisar Bush does not exist except as a rodomontade of the LEFT!

Again for the record, every State in the Union for years has been issuing abstracts of vital records including birth and marriage certificates; if Obama's abstract from Hawaii cannot be shown to have probable cause for incorrectness it is as valid as anyone else's such abstract from any State or County, and of course those unable to show cause an abstract may be false cannot have standing to compel further records or details from Obama or anyone else.

As to 'Comrade Obama/USSA', we don't even know what he or his Cabinet or the next Congress will produce, and it's the public opinion of RESULTS in futuro which would seem to matter the most...not horse hockey from Neocons on auto-attack, after losing two big elections in a row for producing nothing which seemed to please most people.

Gays will not eat our children, a significant majority of LSBT people ARE born that way, Neocons and faith-funded, interfaith Calvinists and others cannot scientifically demonstrate their claim NOBODY is born that way, gays will not be seeking out our children as if more perverse themselves than any other collective(s) in which molesters have been found (gays not more dangerous than anyone else), and kids cannot be "educated or trained" into being LSBT.

As for faith funding, no...there AREN'T people God damns from birth and that governments "He places" to run us can best discern, so let officials who's worthy, who has to get permanently brushed aside even if circumstances equal to parties "discerned", whether nationals over immigrants, immigrants over nationals, Neocons over homeless due to mortgages/disasters/job losses or vice versa, this race(s) over that race(s), what have you; I certainly haven't yet heard "Comrade Obama" use that kind of talk, or like the GOP of Louisana who offer sterilization to economic losers, offer wholesale abortion as major pre-natal care. It seems more Neocons and, but for Neocon funding, extinct CALVINIST clergy and lay members (as opposed to traditional worshippers, sort of how Qaedans are tiny numbers of mass Muslims)are the "Comrades" in terms of social engineering and PSYOPS.

Lastly, again, Neocon PSAs are today again blasting that the economy is really good except for "liberal media" and unions distorting facts to "allow a Communist Revolution led by China to overtake prosperous Americans and thereto immigrants" while Obama continues the "Crusade against all Islam".

Now, most of us realize our problem is with an Iranian government solid with France, which as always blows between the USA, China, and Russia about doing ANYTHING productive for the Mid East and world; France aspires to be the fly in the UN Security Council ointment while pals like Iran's leaders keep a Mission to the UN in Pakistan's Embassy, and France says anyone who doesn't believe Iran's President isn't good for his own democracy (despite his laws against women in business or politics) or won't fight terrorists especially Sunni Qaeda (who hide out in Pakistan, home of Iran's ambassadors) is a racist xenophobe who needs to go green and turn down their military-industrial empire of wealth instead of abuse Latinos in a Crusade against all Islam with Iran the great protector of peace....and even China, per France, should remember to know its place against the European Union lest France shout "j'accuse!" their way, too...just like France has ALWAYS done since the start of the Cold War, taking money from all sides while doing nothing except threatening to scold no-pays.

It is intriguing that Neocons wish to take the side of the very things they say are keeping America from proceeding; and why falsify Obama's Cabinet and Mid East purposes on behalf of those least likely to want to see USA population success?

For these reason, and in hopes it would lead to all good Muslims, Asian leaders, and everyone else coming together to truly improve humanity and upward opportunities in all cultures, I again reiterate my support for a return to the Fairness Doctrine...in fact, Neocons have SO much spin at their disposal, I would even support using their own prior tactic and actually suspend filibusters if needed, where the only money Neocons will "invest" is in making scenes trying to convince the public the only way to screw up IS to change.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

GOP: Moving Ultra-Right, Ultra-Comfortably Set, Or Both?

A lot of pundits in media and politics today are being cited in emails to my inbox today, particularly in those emails in the Social Conservative or Neocon niche of the political spectrum; apparently, Neocons of every stripe are saying Black Friday is a boon to the economy even if all it does is wind up being a one-day grab for deep discounts; they're worried about DOMA being repealed by Obama and gays being more included in society; union wages are all that's crippling the auto industry against well-off population in general; union acts in Congress are unnecessary; and my personal favorite, that even Katrina/Rita/tornado survivors, as well as those losing jobs or caught up in mortgage fiascos or forced to live in family homes, are to be conflated into one stereotypical mass of homeless all being narcotic-using dregs we're all better off without and who somehow threaten our freedom ( as Jack Paar said, "I kid you not"...see what GOPUSA has been flying at http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/tsowell/2008/ts_12021.shtml ).
Then of course Neocons and those representing the lay members of faith-funded religions are bent out of shape over allegations the new history of religion in the USA Capitol has been "sterilized" and "whitewashed"; I respectfully remind them, however, that just because Calvinism, and its "many even good people and socially constructive people just are pre-destined to damnation so let 'em be slaves or permanent private prisoners" philosophy, is required to receive government funds without which "God's Chosen Clergy" would starve despite their own claims God saves His true own, depictions which may indicate to the contrary in American history does not make such exhibits "PC".
 
I could say that gays won't be any more likely to enter marriages with heterosexuals if the Defense of Marriage Act is abolished, so it's highly unlikely straight men or women will be mistaken as possibly gay if married, so why isolate people born gay (as even the staunchest religious objector can't offer biological proof some people AREN'T born gay) just because you fear the NEA telling your minor children to experiment right now with homosexuality...see, even Neocons fund such NEA stuff because they feel it will speak to faith-funded laities whose preachers assure them no one's BORN gay, thus creating panic over children being "taught" into being gay; then, the Neocons hope to build homophobia as a "real America issue" based purely off hot air and deception...and keep their candidates in so the status quo, quite profitable for them if not many others, sits just as it is: "We'd vote fer change, but thet thar feller doesn't hate gays so fer our young'uns sake we jus' CAIN'T vote fer 'em...better off broke or starved than light in yer loafers!".
 
Rather than take Neocon spin as something more than pure PSYOPS to make you think someone watching you sink has thrown you other than anchors, I suggest auto-palaver...Left, Right, or Center...not even be allowed to rise to the "dignity" of wedge issues before an Obama and Democrat government has even official been Inaugurated; that includes social doodle fretting by some Liberals that Obama laughing off his earlier criticism of Hillary Clinton is worrisome; he may not want to trample rights, he may just have meant that in his own opinion, he was of somehow even slightly better credentials or accumen for PRESIDENT, but believes Hillary deserves to be in near line of succession and can handle the tasks befalling a Secretary of State...she IS a good heat-taker as well as server.
 
Let's give Obama and Congress a chance, and assume that the GOP for now caters after only those rarified recipients of bailouts and similar corporate or religious welfares, so of course they'll auto-slam anything to keep anything from changing a whit.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Will Iran And Pakistan Really Dry Up Terror In Own Backyards THIS Time?

Maybe there's not so much a "new" face of Islamic terror as "new desperate ways plied" enabling plain sight of how it links to certain leaders...the ones who imply China or the USA or whoever are "racist Crusaders", sit on their own folks including Muslim sects, and further imply China or whoever will protect them as they boldly admit using Qaeda et al from within to "destabilize" whatever nation(s) they take notions against.

Next time Iran says it's just a protector of democracy interested in just Iraq's autonomy and not say helping Qaeda types, consider "The Campaign for Equality", an Iranian women’s rights initiative launched in 2006 that is committed to ending discrimination against women in Iranian law. I am deeply concerned to hear that several activists have been arrested or tried for activities which are entirely legal, such as organizing peaceful gatherings and educational workshops, and petitioning for legislative change.

I have heard that the Iranian authorities have blocked access to the Campaign’s main website from inside Iran at least 12 times. Campaign for Equality activist Parvin Ardalan was prevented from traveling abroad to receive a Human Rights Prize, and Ronak Safarzadeh and Hana Abdi are currently detained as prisoners of conscience solely because of their human rights work.

As for the "would not help Sunni Qaedans what with Mahmoud being Shiite and all", well, the Permanent Mission of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations...for some time...has been housed within the Embassy of Pakistan in NYC; we all know how hard Pakistan has been wrestling with "controlling" terrorists, if Mumbai is any indicator.

Still, I hope Iran WILL become a better democracy AND true partner in anti-terrorism as well as global good citizenship, and the same hopes are there for Pakistan; at the same time, again, I would ask those who voted for Obama to not be too hard on him for not waving a magic wand and evacuating USA and other troops upon his Inauguration...compelling as 911s and Mumbais and so many other tragedies have been for the world, it seems same are too remote for some Mid East leaders to "risk pushing terrorists in own backyards".

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Logic, The Most Often Tortured Victim Of Global Terror War.

For the first time this December, I’ll be joining Amnesty International’s annual Write-A-Thon, an effort of everyday through first professional people of all walks and nations, which effort asks various Eastern and Western hemisphere nations to abide by their Constitutions re those jailed either without trials or for simply showing interest in peaceful democracy-advocating movements.

Have I become an arch-hippie or some such? Not at all…I’m not advocating any nation on earth do or not do anything else, and point out in each letter that Constitutional adherences may more easily isolate which government(s) would or would not be cause(s) of terrorist codlings or other unpopular issues.

The recent bombings in Mumbai point out how when all nations, even all UN Security Council ones, are afraid or unwilling to act against a single rather small nation which (regardless of named leaders) admits terrorist use, not only are innocent lives lost as collateral damage to global hamstringings, big powers look like the anti-democracy acts of terrorists are the tacit warnings of big nations themselves.

An example: in the same year Chinese President Hu Jintao is shown in USA media bypassing officials and meeting with USA corporate heads, China imprisons a man for 10 years for the “crime” of using “Yahoo!” to contact a pro-democracy website. Instantly, some media and pundits accuse China of masterminding global economic woes; they throw in “clinchers” that China then provided so much global credit, including to Iran and Pakistan, it HAS to be THE nation blocking progress (later, “unless it’s Putin or how about…”).

Yet truth is, China doesn’t set USA or other non-Chinese protocols; in the Eastern hemisphere, even Iran…providing scads of oil to China…there accused China of backing the USA in the Mid East! A number of Mid East nations, led by those of opinion oil for leaders and sand for their people works for them, discourage involvement in democratic processes…and most use terror tactics or threats to ensure alternative fuels will languish while competing between themselves via their own “by from us or else!” quest for profits. Some Mid East nations will even do their own 180 turn on Saddam Hussein and say “the USA just grabbed for oil”; with the USA across an ocean as its troops disrupt westward terror movement, but China and Russia much closer to loose terror players, is it any wonder they sit on their hands re Pakistan, jab at the USA and democracy movements, and such, out of self-protection? Or ask Doudou Diene to paint the USA as racist to Muslims, racists to Latinos, or both, so more “has” to be spent avoiding such charges to break funds re Mid East troop presence/defense (as well as bankrupt Latinos, USA nationals, and all thereto immigrants, by coincidence), to shield against the rodomontades of their own hemispheric pundits and European Union critics?

Well, I don’t believe ANY nation on earth should be held hostage to an otherwise impotent blowhard simply issuing one press release for this hemisphere, another for that one…and playing all ends to a comfortable middle. Recently, as Pakistan with or without Mushareff admits using Qaeda to destabilize(?) Afghani Pashtun tribal leaders, Pakistani-based terrorists hit USA and UK targets (and Hindus!) in Mumbai; Mushareff in 1999 introduced the “Islam as race” article conflating Pakistani State Islam into a new “race” to extort from India, and it appears post-Mushareff that the beat goes on with added twist India’s trade/martial allies better back off “or else!”…no wonder a year ago China said its State Bank would concentrate on China alone, what with so many nations it lends to accruing sour images! But that may only make Pakistan MORE terror-exporting in its thirst for easy money for its leaders’ use…which doesn’t even seem to include their own people.

The biggest 20th Century Cold War tactic was that some nations played big guys against each other, wagged their fingers at all of them, did nothing themselves, and took foreign aid from all sides to shut up. In the spirit of respectfully submitting that lawful treatment of political prisoners and peaceful democracy proponents is a step toward credibility that a nation isn’t a Cold War rekindler, or isn’t a proper recipient of certain criticisms, or both, or hoping to make cash as a “nag”, again, this is why as a Conservative I’m joining Amnesty International’s annual appeal for clemency and Constitutional conducts.

By the way, it’s also why I’m asking Obama voters to not be hard on him for not just zooming out of Iraq, and am asking election-losing Conservatives how it sounds to say “let things globally and USA rights-wise lie, even if not tethered to war on terror, and don’t worry…we can still do what we always do economically: force out X amount employees so they quit and get no unemployment insurance, then hire same X of even unqualifieds to same positions and claim we also created jobs…repeat as needed”.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

As Markets Soar This Thanksgiving, Recall Best Stocks Include Private Prisons.

It's not just drug makers, search engines, cell phones, and homebuilding/mortgaging companies who lead stocks and rejoice at every bailout; there are also three having NYSE symbols CRX, GEO, and CRN.
 
Of course, these companies...performing most well and consistently since 2001...are companies which provide non-State or non-Federal facilities off radar from public prisoner counts, and offenses can be any misdemeanor or felony. These companies are Corrections Corporation Of America ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corrections_Corporation_of_America ), The Geo Group Inc (
http://www.thegeogroupinc.com/ ), and Cornell Companies ( http://finance.google.com/finance?client=ob&q=NYSE:CRN ); not much about their rendition agreements to send/accept arrays of convicts/accuseds transnationally, if any, or denial(s) that such exist(ed), to within author seems publicly available. By coincidence, it seems the number of jobs they create is eclipsed by the number of incarcerated they handle; beyond concern of too many inmates stressing too few guards or creating "need" for Alcatraz-type harsh "warnings to others", not much independent stuff online about how the released transition into what community(ies), where, or how successfully, if at all. 
 
In that bailouts are a form of government ownership if temporary, such firms are part of the Wall Street bailout, and ordinarily these firms contract with governments and always have public money thus expended upon them which somehow winds up in hands of private investors, in the Conservative pursuit of individual responsible freedom, Constitutional protections for all, and Conservative use of money, I humbly submit that it might be a good idea to ask any President, Congress, and one's local officials just how much a part of their plans such companies will be...and what the point of operating or letting stand government holding tanks is should such companies wind up with all business anyway. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Again, Should Government Priority Be Loss Of Humanity?

As Congress.org shows at its webpage linking to messaging what readers want to tell their officials to make priorities, many pols Left and Right know what THE priorities of Congress MUST be, paramount to all other things or America will be dead in the water, no change possible.

Bill Frist wants the same socialized healthcare the Left does, his only twist appearing to be he and close-helds could own any stock the government doesn't glom on to.

Colin Powell knows the priority is NOT defense, NOT jobs, NOT worries over credit and mortgages, NOT Constitutional functionings, but "the children"...most of whom for years are being taught, essentially, that the world of internet device/movie/television screens is the real world, all else they can see being the false one; most young folks today "know" that life is all about people in managed jobless, equity-free, credit-only "habitrail" New Urban communities, and that we're all like on "Survivor" where anyone on earth can enter and those who don't fit are cast out, the point being to become annointed like an Oprah, American Idol, or other icon du jour on the aforesaid sacred screens.  

And so it goes with most pundits and personalities. We have a government who increasingly owns credit companies, credit reporters, property, healthcare...sure sounds like Socialism, not convincingly overcome that in totalist style some ownership stock is given to "those out of government" yet curiously on "retirement" pay thereof and in sitting officials' inner circles. Worse, government is leaning toward letting us have for worship (for those who choose Deism) only religious groups funded by government, and which too often tend to have a Calvinist or Puritan vision of "some people are vessels of wrath no matter good they do, so don't worry what happens to THEM".

Maybe, just maybe, in a representative democracy, the better thing would not be to ask folks to choose what Obama, Bush, Oprah, Powell, Huckabee, Frist, or even I personally care to offer, but to ask the People what they in manifest numbers expect...and make THAT the paramount priority of Congress, the White House, and all State and Local governments.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Wish For Thanksgiving And For All The Globe's Holidays.

Yes, I am a William F. Buckley, Jr. Conservative.
 
But I want to remind everyone on earth that I try to be absolutely fair with all on earth and every possible issue arising. I do not proceed with rancor against anyone, even those whom any nations' Courts or the ICC issue warrants against...there is no issue which cannot be addressed without humanity, and we all on earth must never lose that or we indeed have lost everything.
 
I would like to wish my USA readers a Good Thanksgiving, and to everyone on earth, I most sincerely and dearly wish you and yours whatever Holiday(s) this season are dear to your traditions. I plan no more posts until the new Congress convenes...let's give them and our new President a chance.
 
In that spirit, I'd like everyone to share a replay of one of my favorite songs by one of my favorite groups; I hope it will inspire us all to be the best we can be: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLxTpsIVzzo&feature=related . 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Can We Close USA Office Of Qaeda Propaganda, Too?

Earlier today I opined that Obama should close the Office Of Faith Based Initiatives, because it plies Calvinism and Puritanism across Christian and other sects, or places diverse clergy in control of government and society (al-Qaeda like, to be sure), or both.
 
Now comes breaking news that pukes-extraordinaire, al-Qaeda, are saying they hate Obama and want to attack the USA to get him; see http://www.reuters.com/article/wtMostRead/idUSTRE4AI47X20081119 .
 
How wonderful that after all those other Muslims and Christians and atheists and races white and not, all due to pursuing the infinitesimally small Qaeda (weighed against global populations) unlike everyone HAS a voice, and not only that...the microphones  and cameras at Reuters, most mainstream media globally, and many USA officials' offices. The mind reels to think what would be the case if mad dog killers who kill even Muslims, who want to kill Bush, Obama, you, me, and all American lifeforms since the first 1990's WTC pipe bombs...what if such rabid psychos were arrested, eradicated in resisting arrest, or both?
 
Even our own and foreign officials tell us everyone who gives air to Qaedan threats (except officials or media) emboldens them, is "of interest" for doing so at all, or is "of interest" for criticizing even policy allowing Qaeda to thrive despite your own eight years' work against Qaeda and in support of USA military and even GOP.
 
For these reasons, I applaud Obama for not commenting about the "duhhhhh, no, really?" threat number mega-bazillion-gazillion and one from a tiny number of filth who would kill all on the planet for enough cash, safe housing, and media exposure...which only those who seek to scare us spew on behalf of Qaeda as if wielding them against us at home and to everyone abroad.
 
Also, I reiterate my "WHO CARES?" about anything Qaeda says; I do not fear Qaeda nor any other common killers who are attrition weapons handlers and could only get nukes if our officials wanted them into our towns; if our folks think having us offed by nukes and blaming Qaeda is just what they'll do if we don't sit staring at the sun, and quit sassing or pestering the elected, hey...I don't believe that's truly a worry, even unspoken, as neither Bush, nor Obama, nor Russia, nor Qaeda, nor you, nor me..no one on earth...would want to unleash megatons across a hemisphere which will destroy even China and Russia and Africa by atmospheric drifting.
 
So like every other source of violent death, Qaeda is out there, and who knows how many loons as has ALWAYS been the case in mass humanity. Let's use all our powers to plug up or eradicate QAEDA AND ITS ILK BY ANY NAMES, not tear at Obama as if say a GOPer would have kept us safer...it sounds like a power play threat from the lips which say or imply it, and they, like Qaeda, are hardly the stuff to bend upon knees before.
 
Please, President-Elect Obama, close down not only Faith Based Initiatives, but Qaeda's Oval Office and USA media pulpit Office Of Propaganda.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hoping Obama Will Close Office Of Faith Based Initiatives.

As I was looking over my inbox today, several messages from such as Dick Armey therein appeared, each telling me that really it's these union wages which have bust the auto industry, and that not bailing out that sector will save the economy and let auto makers pull themselves up by their bootstraps.
 
This, I thought, was the kind of tour de force stab at retaining social relevancy so many are doing today (due to lack of bucks in the money supply and economic structure) which gainsays against someone else without tether to reality for raw emotional appeal (casts an invidious shadow): see, them durn Democrats whut bested us'n in TWO successive elections like them thar yoonyun workers, so if'n we bust them dang unions we'll fix the economy, case closed! But lost is the true macro fact that union wages are tiny fraction of any vehicle's cost, prices HAVE to be high even to recoup costs made MOSTLY BY ROBOTIC EQUIPMENT ANYWAY as so few cars have been moving at ANY price the last few years, and generally jobs and income other than refi/ebay-type garage salesmanship have been on a pervasive wane...this is also a subliminal to those abroad that by necessary inference, many, many good jobs would exist but for USA workers making too much (yes, even non-white ones) and who don't want to share...the Right's contribution to the status quo not changing; let's do the twist between little guys and think that alone is all there is.  
 
Then I became aware of a certain Roman Catholic Cardinal in the USA who is saying people who voted Obama...yea, unto Obama himself...are "apocalyptic": http://www.cuatower.com/2008/11/14/cardinal-at-cua-obama-is-%E2%80%98aggressive-disruptive-and-apocalyptic%E2%80%99/ . Remember how I said earlier this year, the Pope adopted a "Kahuna Matata" attitude about all governments/gambios on earth, just do what the locals APPEAR IN YOUR MIND TO WANT? That's his way of getting by where government $$$$$$$ is the largess of your income, and you too must pretend SOMETHING other than a lackluster money supply is ALL laity's problem. Also, I witnessed Illinois State investigators grill my landlord about me after checking out the Catechism of the Roman Catholic Church, I've seen Priests uber-exhort to Holy Hours, Rosaries, et al, then not show themselves but help police ID those who show up as demanding fundamentalists, a Vatican nun endorse Obama; now, in this same farago of clergy (I am NOT poking at the FAITH), over elsewhere in the same USA a DIFFERENT Cardinal is doing the same thing to people where MCCAIN and such are the demigods...one wonders what those in the Mid East, Africa, and elsewhere hear about stingy Americans or "all Muslims as killers", inter alia, from such clergy; hope they don't oversell the current USA as the land of instant financial security and unbridled freedoms, too.  
 
For edification of the Cardinals, reread John Chapter 15, please; Jesus Himself said to God that God should NOT take out of this world those who don't hear Him, but that God should protect ALL from the one and only evil one working against all of us, high, low, and in between. ANY Calivinism or Puritanism seems right out by Christ's own mouth, and don't me any Apostle(s) knew better than Him.
 
Now, it's not likely that Roman Catholicism is the only religion scrambling for social relevancy without better ideas than how to extort ongoing relevancy to helping what they perceive to be purse-holding pundits without whom they could not survive any better than the laities they excoriate...worse, that ANY official(s) should find clergy putting themselves in the driver's seat and making government appease THEM.
 
For these reasons, I submit that absolutely, let EVERY peaceful faith attempt to express itself; however, in the interest of true progress and to keep appearances of undue influences through or by any religion(s), the Office Of Faith-Based Initiatives be dissolved and government money in total be stopped to all religions...each one says God will provide for those truly doing his will anyway, so what's the huge fear factor by clergy on that one, especially where just what THEY spend efforts/money on is so often murky?
 
That, and Obama and a new Congress deserve a true chance; all persons in the USA also deserve better service from social service/justice organizations and PACs than idealess name-callings which also only conflate the status quo.    
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Totalism: Decoding Bailout And Anti-Religion Hyper-Hyperbole.

All this year, it's been open season on ol' Jesus Christ again, from marine biology professors in Minnesota grabbing eucharists and slapping trhem around later to show there's nothing in them, to PBS' "Nova" and others saying the Bible is not based on Divinity; oh, man...what a hot, heated super-duper turmoil for our illustrious bureaucrats to focus on in the new year! Think of it! All the poor Holiday sales due to "creeped-out" feelings by most everyone in the USA in regard to being thought of as celebrating or even shopping for anything associated with this ephemeral character...certainly, we all have plenty of cash on hand plus easy mega-credit, somehow brought to us through artificially low-cost (nationalized?) gasoline, so what else COULD be the reason retailers are still glum before the season officially starts?

Now, as for the auto industry bailout proposal, CLTV and other media around here have tried to sell it from the Democrat perspective: representing that only .3% of our GNP is the auto industry, and that 1 out of 10 jobs use a vehicle so we better act to cut further unemployment...and the $6 billion for unemployment extensions generally to be tacked on in fine print to the bailout is to cover but a few well-paid types with degrees who earned enough to get top UI dollars but who will be the last to benefit in an otherwise opulent job and small business national environment; see, mostly white racists and nationalists are STILL keeping out plenty of immigrants (and those abroad looking for work) and non-whites, and believe our pols, faith-funded Churches who couldn't survive on their own, and select media: there is plenty of work and opportunity at present in the USA, and bailouts will only perfect it...cheaply made housing at sky-high prices, by the way, like Obama said is NOT the same as crummy housing during the Great Depression so who needs an FDR mentality...a few bitter, stupid, untrainable, likely "of interest" sociopaths who can best be identified on or more at a time as they deny or question bureaucratic excellence?

Wait...it's so simple to decode that malarkey, really: okay, so Jesus, his early followers, or both, in a worst-case scenario came up wih a way to peaceably worship and serve God, like every other faith has done...every nation that signed the UN religion charter and itself has a Constitutional mandamus to protect religious freedom is asking us to tear at each other over faith just to maintain their own social relevance in a crummy low-money supply economy, to divert attention from a crummy economy, or both...this great debate is of no demonstrable moment to secular, earthly life.

As for the auto industry, so everything already bailed out makes up the remaining 99.7% of GNP in the USA, and only 9 out 10 folks don't need a vehicle for a job, small business operation, or both, nor do they use a vehicle to get to any work...only 1 out of 10 has a need at all for inbound/outbound products, e.g. . So how are there all these jobs and opportunities in the USA, such that no FDR mentality or anything in its near nature need even be contemplated? And, just what expectations IS the $6 billion UI extension tethered to...TEUC has never produced a job yet! If TEUCs 2001 to date had, who'd need bailouts based on fact nobody has cash customers?

For these reasons, it seems that like mortgages and banks, the government now wants to own who gets a car, based off nothing more than a static money supply configuration in a climate where no official, high or low, seriously even entertains long-range planning or opportunity for anything but a conflation thereof. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Help Latinos: Extend Their Government Styles Across Whole Hemisphere?

It would be one thing if it were a lock that Bush, Obama, inter alia wanted USA traditional Constitutional guarantees to be operative in Mexico; sadly, as even just the Ramos-Compean matter and 'Dog" Chapman issue illustrate (Mexico handles even repeat drug lords with Matricula Consular cards, decides if even violent post-judgment rapists of USA nationality may still spend cash in Mexico, and oh...if Mexican troops or police grab or kill USA nationals around borders in all the excitement, what SHOULD USA officials do about it?), it is TO Mexico's policies most USA officials seem to defer with eye toward similar governance on thin premise "it's what other countries are doing".
 
In that spirit, I would like to share with you my email the other day to Mexican officials in respectfully asking them to pursue human rights violations against female Latino detainees in their jurisdiction, with hopes readers thereof will also ask Mexico's co-operation :
 
"Dra. Guadalupe Morfín Otero
FEVIMTRA
Procuraduría General de la República
Rio Elba, No. 17
Col. Cuauhtemoc, Del. Cuauhtemoc
México D.F, C.P. 06300
MÉXICO
 
Dear Special Prosecutor:
 
Both President Bush and President-Elect Obama appear to be enthusiastic for a oneness of mind and government with Mexico in nature of a North American Union, so as an active member of Amnesty International, Conservative politics, and universal religious philosophy (not to mention being a USA national and voter who also lives in a community of omni-ethnic diversity including Latinos and Mexicans in particular), I am herewith endorsing and respectfully submitting for your consideration an Amnesty International matter and position which I am further passing throughout my community, State, and civic organizations for their own endorsement thereof, said matter and policy being, to-wit: 

I must express my deep concern about the rape, sexual assault and torture of  Bárbara Italia Méndez and other women during their detention on May 3 and 4, 2006 in San Salvador Atenco. I understand your government's obligation to guarantee public order, but these duties must be carried out in strict accordance with international human rights standards, including the UN Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials. The rights of Bárbara Italia Méndez and the other women to be free from torture and degrading treatment were violated when they were detained.

It is extremely important to ensure that all those involved in the assaults on Bárbara Italia Méndez and the other detainees are brought to justice, including senior officials who failed to prevent these human rights violations or ensure timely investigations. I urge federal authorities to actively claim full jurisdiction in the cases of the women of Atenco, including those currently under investigation in state jurisdiction, assuring that the accused are charged in federal court and that evidence gathered in line with international human rights standards is incorporated into the investigation.

I respectfully urge you to enforce the effective implementation of the recommendations issued by the National Human Rights Commission in October 2006 regarding these cases. I further call on you to ensure that full reparation be made to Bárbara Italia Méndez and all the victims of human rights violations committed in San Salvador Atenco.

Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter.

Copy to:
Ambassador Arturo Sarukhan Casamitjana
Embassy of Mexico
1911 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006" [End Of Letter Text]
 
Thank you for your review, and for your own hopefully forthcoming joining in making within entreaty.
 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive