About Me

Name: Republiservative
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Why This Conservative Supports Return To Fairness Doctrine.

The barrage of Conservative and non-RNC GOP email PSAs continues: today, I'm told Obama will be challenged on citizenship by still more front Neocon groups, these groups (e.g., Family Research Council)also say Obama's Cabinet is "Mosaic of colors but not ideas", Townhall Spotlight running ads for folks hawking "Comrade Obama/USSA" bumper stickers, on and on and on it goes; and to think, "ferrener Comrade Obama" voted with Bush on most voting occasions, but Kommisar Bush does not exist except as a rodomontade of the LEFT!

Again for the record, every State in the Union for years has been issuing abstracts of vital records including birth and marriage certificates; if Obama's abstract from Hawaii cannot be shown to have probable cause for incorrectness it is as valid as anyone else's such abstract from any State or County, and of course those unable to show cause an abstract may be false cannot have standing to compel further records or details from Obama or anyone else.

As to 'Comrade Obama/USSA', we don't even know what he or his Cabinet or the next Congress will produce, and it's the public opinion of RESULTS in futuro which would seem to matter the most...not horse hockey from Neocons on auto-attack, after losing two big elections in a row for producing nothing which seemed to please most people.

Gays will not eat our children, a significant majority of LSBT people ARE born that way, Neocons and faith-funded, interfaith Calvinists and others cannot scientifically demonstrate their claim NOBODY is born that way, gays will not be seeking out our children as if more perverse themselves than any other collective(s) in which molesters have been found (gays not more dangerous than anyone else), and kids cannot be "educated or trained" into being LSBT.

As for faith funding, no...there AREN'T people God damns from birth and that governments "He places" to run us can best discern, so let officials who's worthy, who has to get permanently brushed aside even if circumstances equal to parties "discerned", whether nationals over immigrants, immigrants over nationals, Neocons over homeless due to mortgages/disasters/job losses or vice versa, this race(s) over that race(s), what have you; I certainly haven't yet heard "Comrade Obama" use that kind of talk, or like the GOP of Louisana who offer sterilization to economic losers, offer wholesale abortion as major pre-natal care. It seems more Neocons and, but for Neocon funding, extinct CALVINIST clergy and lay members (as opposed to traditional worshippers, sort of how Qaedans are tiny numbers of mass Muslims)are the "Comrades" in terms of social engineering and PSYOPS.

Lastly, again, Neocon PSAs are today again blasting that the economy is really good except for "liberal media" and unions distorting facts to "allow a Communist Revolution led by China to overtake prosperous Americans and thereto immigrants" while Obama continues the "Crusade against all Islam".

Now, most of us realize our problem is with an Iranian government solid with France, which as always blows between the USA, China, and Russia about doing ANYTHING productive for the Mid East and world; France aspires to be the fly in the UN Security Council ointment while pals like Iran's leaders keep a Mission to the UN in Pakistan's Embassy, and France says anyone who doesn't believe Iran's President isn't good for his own democracy (despite his laws against women in business or politics) or won't fight terrorists especially Sunni Qaeda (who hide out in Pakistan, home of Iran's ambassadors) is a racist xenophobe who needs to go green and turn down their military-industrial empire of wealth instead of abuse Latinos in a Crusade against all Islam with Iran the great protector of peace....and even China, per France, should remember to know its place against the European Union lest France shout "j'accuse!" their way, too...just like France has ALWAYS done since the start of the Cold War, taking money from all sides while doing nothing except threatening to scold no-pays.

It is intriguing that Neocons wish to take the side of the very things they say are keeping America from proceeding; and why falsify Obama's Cabinet and Mid East purposes on behalf of those least likely to want to see USA population success?

For these reason, and in hopes it would lead to all good Muslims, Asian leaders, and everyone else coming together to truly improve humanity and upward opportunities in all cultures, I again reiterate my support for a return to the Fairness Doctrine...in fact, Neocons have SO much spin at their disposal, I would even support using their own prior tactic and actually suspend filibusters if needed, where the only money Neocons will "invest" is in making scenes trying to convince the public the only way to screw up IS to change.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

GOP: Moving Ultra-Right, Ultra-Comfortably Set, Or Both?

A lot of pundits in media and politics today are being cited in emails to my inbox today, particularly in those emails in the Social Conservative or Neocon niche of the political spectrum; apparently, Neocons of every stripe are saying Black Friday is a boon to the economy even if all it does is wind up being a one-day grab for deep discounts; they're worried about DOMA being repealed by Obama and gays being more included in society; union wages are all that's crippling the auto industry against well-off population in general; union acts in Congress are unnecessary; and my personal favorite, that even Katrina/Rita/tornado survivors, as well as those losing jobs or caught up in mortgage fiascos or forced to live in family homes, are to be conflated into one stereotypical mass of homeless all being narcotic-using dregs we're all better off without and who somehow threaten our freedom ( as Jack Paar said, "I kid you not"...see what GOPUSA has been flying at http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/tsowell/2008/ts_12021.shtml ).
Then of course Neocons and those representing the lay members of faith-funded religions are bent out of shape over allegations the new history of religion in the USA Capitol has been "sterilized" and "whitewashed"; I respectfully remind them, however, that just because Calvinism, and its "many even good people and socially constructive people just are pre-destined to damnation so let 'em be slaves or permanent private prisoners" philosophy, is required to receive government funds without which "God's Chosen Clergy" would starve despite their own claims God saves His true own, depictions which may indicate to the contrary in American history does not make such exhibits "PC".
 
I could say that gays won't be any more likely to enter marriages with heterosexuals if the Defense of Marriage Act is abolished, so it's highly unlikely straight men or women will be mistaken as possibly gay if married, so why isolate people born gay (as even the staunchest religious objector can't offer biological proof some people AREN'T born gay) just because you fear the NEA telling your minor children to experiment right now with homosexuality...see, even Neocons fund such NEA stuff because they feel it will speak to faith-funded laities whose preachers assure them no one's BORN gay, thus creating panic over children being "taught" into being gay; then, the Neocons hope to build homophobia as a "real America issue" based purely off hot air and deception...and keep their candidates in so the status quo, quite profitable for them if not many others, sits just as it is: "We'd vote fer change, but thet thar feller doesn't hate gays so fer our young'uns sake we jus' CAIN'T vote fer 'em...better off broke or starved than light in yer loafers!".
 
Rather than take Neocon spin as something more than pure PSYOPS to make you think someone watching you sink has thrown you other than anchors, I suggest auto-palaver...Left, Right, or Center...not even be allowed to rise to the "dignity" of wedge issues before an Obama and Democrat government has even official been Inaugurated; that includes social doodle fretting by some Liberals that Obama laughing off his earlier criticism of Hillary Clinton is worrisome; he may not want to trample rights, he may just have meant that in his own opinion, he was of somehow even slightly better credentials or accumen for PRESIDENT, but believes Hillary deserves to be in near line of succession and can handle the tasks befalling a Secretary of State...she IS a good heat-taker as well as server.
 
Let's give Obama and Congress a chance, and assume that the GOP for now caters after only those rarified recipients of bailouts and similar corporate or religious welfares, so of course they'll auto-slam anything to keep anything from changing a whit.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Will Iran And Pakistan Really Dry Up Terror In Own Backyards THIS Time?

Maybe there's not so much a "new" face of Islamic terror as "new desperate ways plied" enabling plain sight of how it links to certain leaders...the ones who imply China or the USA or whoever are "racist Crusaders", sit on their own folks including Muslim sects, and further imply China or whoever will protect them as they boldly admit using Qaeda et al from within to "destabilize" whatever nation(s) they take notions against.

Next time Iran says it's just a protector of democracy interested in just Iraq's autonomy and not say helping Qaeda types, consider "The Campaign for Equality", an Iranian women’s rights initiative launched in 2006 that is committed to ending discrimination against women in Iranian law. I am deeply concerned to hear that several activists have been arrested or tried for activities which are entirely legal, such as organizing peaceful gatherings and educational workshops, and petitioning for legislative change.

I have heard that the Iranian authorities have blocked access to the Campaign’s main website from inside Iran at least 12 times. Campaign for Equality activist Parvin Ardalan was prevented from traveling abroad to receive a Human Rights Prize, and Ronak Safarzadeh and Hana Abdi are currently detained as prisoners of conscience solely because of their human rights work.

As for the "would not help Sunni Qaedans what with Mahmoud being Shiite and all", well, the Permanent Mission of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations...for some time...has been housed within the Embassy of Pakistan in NYC; we all know how hard Pakistan has been wrestling with "controlling" terrorists, if Mumbai is any indicator.

Still, I hope Iran WILL become a better democracy AND true partner in anti-terrorism as well as global good citizenship, and the same hopes are there for Pakistan; at the same time, again, I would ask those who voted for Obama to not be too hard on him for not waving a magic wand and evacuating USA and other troops upon his Inauguration...compelling as 911s and Mumbais and so many other tragedies have been for the world, it seems same are too remote for some Mid East leaders to "risk pushing terrorists in own backyards".

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Logic, The Most Often Tortured Victim Of Global Terror War.

For the first time this December, I’ll be joining Amnesty International’s annual Write-A-Thon, an effort of everyday through first professional people of all walks and nations, which effort asks various Eastern and Western hemisphere nations to abide by their Constitutions re those jailed either without trials or for simply showing interest in peaceful democracy-advocating movements.

Have I become an arch-hippie or some such? Not at all…I’m not advocating any nation on earth do or not do anything else, and point out in each letter that Constitutional adherences may more easily isolate which government(s) would or would not be cause(s) of terrorist codlings or other unpopular issues.

The recent bombings in Mumbai point out how when all nations, even all UN Security Council ones, are afraid or unwilling to act against a single rather small nation which (regardless of named leaders) admits terrorist use, not only are innocent lives lost as collateral damage to global hamstringings, big powers look like the anti-democracy acts of terrorists are the tacit warnings of big nations themselves.

An example: in the same year Chinese President Hu Jintao is shown in USA media bypassing officials and meeting with USA corporate heads, China imprisons a man for 10 years for the “crime” of using “Yahoo!” to contact a pro-democracy website. Instantly, some media and pundits accuse China of masterminding global economic woes; they throw in “clinchers” that China then provided so much global credit, including to Iran and Pakistan, it HAS to be THE nation blocking progress (later, “unless it’s Putin or how about…”).

Yet truth is, China doesn’t set USA or other non-Chinese protocols; in the Eastern hemisphere, even Iran…providing scads of oil to China…there accused China of backing the USA in the Mid East! A number of Mid East nations, led by those of opinion oil for leaders and sand for their people works for them, discourage involvement in democratic processes…and most use terror tactics or threats to ensure alternative fuels will languish while competing between themselves via their own “by from us or else!” quest for profits. Some Mid East nations will even do their own 180 turn on Saddam Hussein and say “the USA just grabbed for oil”; with the USA across an ocean as its troops disrupt westward terror movement, but China and Russia much closer to loose terror players, is it any wonder they sit on their hands re Pakistan, jab at the USA and democracy movements, and such, out of self-protection? Or ask Doudou Diene to paint the USA as racist to Muslims, racists to Latinos, or both, so more “has” to be spent avoiding such charges to break funds re Mid East troop presence/defense (as well as bankrupt Latinos, USA nationals, and all thereto immigrants, by coincidence), to shield against the rodomontades of their own hemispheric pundits and European Union critics?

Well, I don’t believe ANY nation on earth should be held hostage to an otherwise impotent blowhard simply issuing one press release for this hemisphere, another for that one…and playing all ends to a comfortable middle. Recently, as Pakistan with or without Mushareff admits using Qaeda to destabilize(?) Afghani Pashtun tribal leaders, Pakistani-based terrorists hit USA and UK targets (and Hindus!) in Mumbai; Mushareff in 1999 introduced the “Islam as race” article conflating Pakistani State Islam into a new “race” to extort from India, and it appears post-Mushareff that the beat goes on with added twist India’s trade/martial allies better back off “or else!”…no wonder a year ago China said its State Bank would concentrate on China alone, what with so many nations it lends to accruing sour images! But that may only make Pakistan MORE terror-exporting in its thirst for easy money for its leaders’ use…which doesn’t even seem to include their own people.

The biggest 20th Century Cold War tactic was that some nations played big guys against each other, wagged their fingers at all of them, did nothing themselves, and took foreign aid from all sides to shut up. In the spirit of respectfully submitting that lawful treatment of political prisoners and peaceful democracy proponents is a step toward credibility that a nation isn’t a Cold War rekindler, or isn’t a proper recipient of certain criticisms, or both, or hoping to make cash as a “nag”, again, this is why as a Conservative I’m joining Amnesty International’s annual appeal for clemency and Constitutional conducts.

By the way, it’s also why I’m asking Obama voters to not be hard on him for not just zooming out of Iraq, and am asking election-losing Conservatives how it sounds to say “let things globally and USA rights-wise lie, even if not tethered to war on terror, and don’t worry…we can still do what we always do economically: force out X amount employees so they quit and get no unemployment insurance, then hire same X of even unqualifieds to same positions and claim we also created jobs…repeat as needed”.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

As Markets Soar This Thanksgiving, Recall Best Stocks Include Private Prisons.

It's not just drug makers, search engines, cell phones, and homebuilding/mortgaging companies who lead stocks and rejoice at every bailout; there are also three having NYSE symbols CRX, GEO, and CRN.
 
Of course, these companies...performing most well and consistently since 2001...are companies which provide non-State or non-Federal facilities off radar from public prisoner counts, and offenses can be any misdemeanor or felony. These companies are Corrections Corporation Of America ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corrections_Corporation_of_America ), The Geo Group Inc (
http://www.thegeogroupinc.com/ ), and Cornell Companies ( http://finance.google.com/finance?client=ob&q=NYSE:CRN ); not much about their rendition agreements to send/accept arrays of convicts/accuseds transnationally, if any, or denial(s) that such exist(ed), to within author seems publicly available. By coincidence, it seems the number of jobs they create is eclipsed by the number of incarcerated they handle; beyond concern of too many inmates stressing too few guards or creating "need" for Alcatraz-type harsh "warnings to others", not much independent stuff online about how the released transition into what community(ies), where, or how successfully, if at all. 
 
In that bailouts are a form of government ownership if temporary, such firms are part of the Wall Street bailout, and ordinarily these firms contract with governments and always have public money thus expended upon them which somehow winds up in hands of private investors, in the Conservative pursuit of individual responsible freedom, Constitutional protections for all, and Conservative use of money, I humbly submit that it might be a good idea to ask any President, Congress, and one's local officials just how much a part of their plans such companies will be...and what the point of operating or letting stand government holding tanks is should such companies wind up with all business anyway. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Again, Should Government Priority Be Loss Of Humanity?

As Congress.org shows at its webpage linking to messaging what readers want to tell their officials to make priorities, many pols Left and Right know what THE priorities of Congress MUST be, paramount to all other things or America will be dead in the water, no change possible.

Bill Frist wants the same socialized healthcare the Left does, his only twist appearing to be he and close-helds could own any stock the government doesn't glom on to.

Colin Powell knows the priority is NOT defense, NOT jobs, NOT worries over credit and mortgages, NOT Constitutional functionings, but "the children"...most of whom for years are being taught, essentially, that the world of internet device/movie/television screens is the real world, all else they can see being the false one; most young folks today "know" that life is all about people in managed jobless, equity-free, credit-only "habitrail" New Urban communities, and that we're all like on "Survivor" where anyone on earth can enter and those who don't fit are cast out, the point being to become annointed like an Oprah, American Idol, or other icon du jour on the aforesaid sacred screens.  

And so it goes with most pundits and personalities. We have a government who increasingly owns credit companies, credit reporters, property, healthcare...sure sounds like Socialism, not convincingly overcome that in totalist style some ownership stock is given to "those out of government" yet curiously on "retirement" pay thereof and in sitting officials' inner circles. Worse, government is leaning toward letting us have for worship (for those who choose Deism) only religious groups funded by government, and which too often tend to have a Calvinist or Puritan vision of "some people are vessels of wrath no matter good they do, so don't worry what happens to THEM".

Maybe, just maybe, in a representative democracy, the better thing would not be to ask folks to choose what Obama, Bush, Oprah, Powell, Huckabee, Frist, or even I personally care to offer, but to ask the People what they in manifest numbers expect...and make THAT the paramount priority of Congress, the White House, and all State and Local governments.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Wish For Thanksgiving And For All The Globe's Holidays.

Yes, I am a William F. Buckley, Jr. Conservative.
 
But I want to remind everyone on earth that I try to be absolutely fair with all on earth and every possible issue arising. I do not proceed with rancor against anyone, even those whom any nations' Courts or the ICC issue warrants against...there is no issue which cannot be addressed without humanity, and we all on earth must never lose that or we indeed have lost everything.
 
I would like to wish my USA readers a Good Thanksgiving, and to everyone on earth, I most sincerely and dearly wish you and yours whatever Holiday(s) this season are dear to your traditions. I plan no more posts until the new Congress convenes...let's give them and our new President a chance.
 
In that spirit, I'd like everyone to share a replay of one of my favorite songs by one of my favorite groups; I hope it will inspire us all to be the best we can be: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLxTpsIVzzo&feature=related . 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Can We Close USA Office Of Qaeda Propaganda, Too?

Earlier today I opined that Obama should close the Office Of Faith Based Initiatives, because it plies Calvinism and Puritanism across Christian and other sects, or places diverse clergy in control of government and society (al-Qaeda like, to be sure), or both.
 
Now comes breaking news that pukes-extraordinaire, al-Qaeda, are saying they hate Obama and want to attack the USA to get him; see http://www.reuters.com/article/wtMostRead/idUSTRE4AI47X20081119 .
 
How wonderful that after all those other Muslims and Christians and atheists and races white and not, all due to pursuing the infinitesimally small Qaeda (weighed against global populations) unlike everyone HAS a voice, and not only that...the microphones  and cameras at Reuters, most mainstream media globally, and many USA officials' offices. The mind reels to think what would be the case if mad dog killers who kill even Muslims, who want to kill Bush, Obama, you, me, and all American lifeforms since the first 1990's WTC pipe bombs...what if such rabid psychos were arrested, eradicated in resisting arrest, or both?
 
Even our own and foreign officials tell us everyone who gives air to Qaedan threats (except officials or media) emboldens them, is "of interest" for doing so at all, or is "of interest" for criticizing even policy allowing Qaeda to thrive despite your own eight years' work against Qaeda and in support of USA military and even GOP.
 
For these reasons, I applaud Obama for not commenting about the "duhhhhh, no, really?" threat number mega-bazillion-gazillion and one from a tiny number of filth who would kill all on the planet for enough cash, safe housing, and media exposure...which only those who seek to scare us spew on behalf of Qaeda as if wielding them against us at home and to everyone abroad.
 
Also, I reiterate my "WHO CARES?" about anything Qaeda says; I do not fear Qaeda nor any other common killers who are attrition weapons handlers and could only get nukes if our officials wanted them into our towns; if our folks think having us offed by nukes and blaming Qaeda is just what they'll do if we don't sit staring at the sun, and quit sassing or pestering the elected, hey...I don't believe that's truly a worry, even unspoken, as neither Bush, nor Obama, nor Russia, nor Qaeda, nor you, nor me..no one on earth...would want to unleash megatons across a hemisphere which will destroy even China and Russia and Africa by atmospheric drifting.
 
So like every other source of violent death, Qaeda is out there, and who knows how many loons as has ALWAYS been the case in mass humanity. Let's use all our powers to plug up or eradicate QAEDA AND ITS ILK BY ANY NAMES, not tear at Obama as if say a GOPer would have kept us safer...it sounds like a power play threat from the lips which say or imply it, and they, like Qaeda, are hardly the stuff to bend upon knees before.
 
Please, President-Elect Obama, close down not only Faith Based Initiatives, but Qaeda's Oval Office and USA media pulpit Office Of Propaganda.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hoping Obama Will Close Office Of Faith Based Initiatives.

As I was looking over my inbox today, several messages from such as Dick Armey therein appeared, each telling me that really it's these union wages which have bust the auto industry, and that not bailing out that sector will save the economy and let auto makers pull themselves up by their bootstraps.
 
This, I thought, was the kind of tour de force stab at retaining social relevancy so many are doing today (due to lack of bucks in the money supply and economic structure) which gainsays against someone else without tether to reality for raw emotional appeal (casts an invidious shadow): see, them durn Democrats whut bested us'n in TWO successive elections like them thar yoonyun workers, so if'n we bust them dang unions we'll fix the economy, case closed! But lost is the true macro fact that union wages are tiny fraction of any vehicle's cost, prices HAVE to be high even to recoup costs made MOSTLY BY ROBOTIC EQUIPMENT ANYWAY as so few cars have been moving at ANY price the last few years, and generally jobs and income other than refi/ebay-type garage salesmanship have been on a pervasive wane...this is also a subliminal to those abroad that by necessary inference, many, many good jobs would exist but for USA workers making too much (yes, even non-white ones) and who don't want to share...the Right's contribution to the status quo not changing; let's do the twist between little guys and think that alone is all there is.  
 
Then I became aware of a certain Roman Catholic Cardinal in the USA who is saying people who voted Obama...yea, unto Obama himself...are "apocalyptic": http://www.cuatower.com/2008/11/14/cardinal-at-cua-obama-is-%E2%80%98aggressive-disruptive-and-apocalyptic%E2%80%99/ . Remember how I said earlier this year, the Pope adopted a "Kahuna Matata" attitude about all governments/gambios on earth, just do what the locals APPEAR IN YOUR MIND TO WANT? That's his way of getting by where government $$$$$$$ is the largess of your income, and you too must pretend SOMETHING other than a lackluster money supply is ALL laity's problem. Also, I witnessed Illinois State investigators grill my landlord about me after checking out the Catechism of the Roman Catholic Church, I've seen Priests uber-exhort to Holy Hours, Rosaries, et al, then not show themselves but help police ID those who show up as demanding fundamentalists, a Vatican nun endorse Obama; now, in this same farago of clergy (I am NOT poking at the FAITH), over elsewhere in the same USA a DIFFERENT Cardinal is doing the same thing to people where MCCAIN and such are the demigods...one wonders what those in the Mid East, Africa, and elsewhere hear about stingy Americans or "all Muslims as killers", inter alia, from such clergy; hope they don't oversell the current USA as the land of instant financial security and unbridled freedoms, too.  
 
For edification of the Cardinals, reread John Chapter 15, please; Jesus Himself said to God that God should NOT take out of this world those who don't hear Him, but that God should protect ALL from the one and only evil one working against all of us, high, low, and in between. ANY Calivinism or Puritanism seems right out by Christ's own mouth, and don't me any Apostle(s) knew better than Him.
 
Now, it's not likely that Roman Catholicism is the only religion scrambling for social relevancy without better ideas than how to extort ongoing relevancy to helping what they perceive to be purse-holding pundits without whom they could not survive any better than the laities they excoriate...worse, that ANY official(s) should find clergy putting themselves in the driver's seat and making government appease THEM.
 
For these reasons, I submit that absolutely, let EVERY peaceful faith attempt to express itself; however, in the interest of true progress and to keep appearances of undue influences through or by any religion(s), the Office Of Faith-Based Initiatives be dissolved and government money in total be stopped to all religions...each one says God will provide for those truly doing his will anyway, so what's the huge fear factor by clergy on that one, especially where just what THEY spend efforts/money on is so often murky?
 
That, and Obama and a new Congress deserve a true chance; all persons in the USA also deserve better service from social service/justice organizations and PACs than idealess name-callings which also only conflate the status quo.    
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Totalism: Decoding Bailout And Anti-Religion Hyper-Hyperbole.

All this year, it's been open season on ol' Jesus Christ again, from marine biology professors in Minnesota grabbing eucharists and slapping trhem around later to show there's nothing in them, to PBS' "Nova" and others saying the Bible is not based on Divinity; oh, man...what a hot, heated super-duper turmoil for our illustrious bureaucrats to focus on in the new year! Think of it! All the poor Holiday sales due to "creeped-out" feelings by most everyone in the USA in regard to being thought of as celebrating or even shopping for anything associated with this ephemeral character...certainly, we all have plenty of cash on hand plus easy mega-credit, somehow brought to us through artificially low-cost (nationalized?) gasoline, so what else COULD be the reason retailers are still glum before the season officially starts?

Now, as for the auto industry bailout proposal, CLTV and other media around here have tried to sell it from the Democrat perspective: representing that only .3% of our GNP is the auto industry, and that 1 out of 10 jobs use a vehicle so we better act to cut further unemployment...and the $6 billion for unemployment extensions generally to be tacked on in fine print to the bailout is to cover but a few well-paid types with degrees who earned enough to get top UI dollars but who will be the last to benefit in an otherwise opulent job and small business national environment; see, mostly white racists and nationalists are STILL keeping out plenty of immigrants (and those abroad looking for work) and non-whites, and believe our pols, faith-funded Churches who couldn't survive on their own, and select media: there is plenty of work and opportunity at present in the USA, and bailouts will only perfect it...cheaply made housing at sky-high prices, by the way, like Obama said is NOT the same as crummy housing during the Great Depression so who needs an FDR mentality...a few bitter, stupid, untrainable, likely "of interest" sociopaths who can best be identified on or more at a time as they deny or question bureaucratic excellence?

Wait...it's so simple to decode that malarkey, really: okay, so Jesus, his early followers, or both, in a worst-case scenario came up wih a way to peaceably worship and serve God, like every other faith has done...every nation that signed the UN religion charter and itself has a Constitutional mandamus to protect religious freedom is asking us to tear at each other over faith just to maintain their own social relevance in a crummy low-money supply economy, to divert attention from a crummy economy, or both...this great debate is of no demonstrable moment to secular, earthly life.

As for the auto industry, so everything already bailed out makes up the remaining 99.7% of GNP in the USA, and only 9 out 10 folks don't need a vehicle for a job, small business operation, or both, nor do they use a vehicle to get to any work...only 1 out of 10 has a need at all for inbound/outbound products, e.g. . So how are there all these jobs and opportunities in the USA, such that no FDR mentality or anything in its near nature need even be contemplated? And, just what expectations IS the $6 billion UI extension tethered to...TEUC has never produced a job yet! If TEUCs 2001 to date had, who'd need bailouts based on fact nobody has cash customers?

For these reasons, it seems that like mortgages and banks, the government now wants to own who gets a car, based off nothing more than a static money supply configuration in a climate where no official, high or low, seriously even entertains long-range planning or opportunity for anything but a conflation thereof. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Help Latinos: Extend Their Government Styles Across Whole Hemisphere?

It would be one thing if it were a lock that Bush, Obama, inter alia wanted USA traditional Constitutional guarantees to be operative in Mexico; sadly, as even just the Ramos-Compean matter and 'Dog" Chapman issue illustrate (Mexico handles even repeat drug lords with Matricula Consular cards, decides if even violent post-judgment rapists of USA nationality may still spend cash in Mexico, and oh...if Mexican troops or police grab or kill USA nationals around borders in all the excitement, what SHOULD USA officials do about it?), it is TO Mexico's policies most USA officials seem to defer with eye toward similar governance on thin premise "it's what other countries are doing".
 
In that spirit, I would like to share with you my email the other day to Mexican officials in respectfully asking them to pursue human rights violations against female Latino detainees in their jurisdiction, with hopes readers thereof will also ask Mexico's co-operation :
 
"Dra. Guadalupe Morfín Otero
FEVIMTRA
Procuraduría General de la República
Rio Elba, No. 17
Col. Cuauhtemoc, Del. Cuauhtemoc
México D.F, C.P. 06300
MÉXICO
 
Dear Special Prosecutor:
 
Both President Bush and President-Elect Obama appear to be enthusiastic for a oneness of mind and government with Mexico in nature of a North American Union, so as an active member of Amnesty International, Conservative politics, and universal religious philosophy (not to mention being a USA national and voter who also lives in a community of omni-ethnic diversity including Latinos and Mexicans in particular), I am herewith endorsing and respectfully submitting for your consideration an Amnesty International matter and position which I am further passing throughout my community, State, and civic organizations for their own endorsement thereof, said matter and policy being, to-wit: 

I must express my deep concern about the rape, sexual assault and torture of  Bárbara Italia Méndez and other women during their detention on May 3 and 4, 2006 in San Salvador Atenco. I understand your government's obligation to guarantee public order, but these duties must be carried out in strict accordance with international human rights standards, including the UN Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials. The rights of Bárbara Italia Méndez and the other women to be free from torture and degrading treatment were violated when they were detained.

It is extremely important to ensure that all those involved in the assaults on Bárbara Italia Méndez and the other detainees are brought to justice, including senior officials who failed to prevent these human rights violations or ensure timely investigations. I urge federal authorities to actively claim full jurisdiction in the cases of the women of Atenco, including those currently under investigation in state jurisdiction, assuring that the accused are charged in federal court and that evidence gathered in line with international human rights standards is incorporated into the investigation.

I respectfully urge you to enforce the effective implementation of the recommendations issued by the National Human Rights Commission in October 2006 regarding these cases. I further call on you to ensure that full reparation be made to Bárbara Italia Méndez and all the victims of human rights violations committed in San Salvador Atenco.

Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter.

Copy to:
Ambassador Arturo Sarukhan Casamitjana
Embassy of Mexico
1911 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006" [End Of Letter Text]
 
Thank you for your review, and for your own hopefully forthcoming joining in making within entreaty.
 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Maybe Bail Out On Ideas Resulting In "Government Voucher" Society?

Local media here in Illinois were touting this morning only that the State of Illinois has $4billion it owes to unnamed debtor(s); of course, the suggestion is "crisis! crisis!" that needs Federal bailout, and of course, why bother asking what money WAS spent on or why this shadowy crisis won't happen after another State bailout, if any? In the meantime, status quo as it is in Illinois.
 
Then there's the bailout bill for the auto industry the USA Senate will take up Monday, $25 billion just for one ever-declining industry; yes, cars will still be made; no, job retention or creation aren't envisioned but unemployment extensions for out-of-work auto workers is being bandied about on the Hill, as it appears no real increase to cash customers is anticipated, at least not one demographically correct one in the USA.
 
Now, in Illinois, it seems it's still "business as usual" re the sprawl of commercial space decline, falling wages, and move to credit-based New Urbanism, nationals and ever-increasing immigrants alike; thank goodness gas is almost artificially low over per-barrel costs, as many people seem to be enjoying tooling around after being cooped up during high prices of the last year or so...but again, they don't seem to be observable buying much beyond "joyride gas". Apparently, such politically designed "social credit" will further extend into the new USA auto industry as well...as long as governmental currency Comptrollers and State counterparts direct who's politically correct to receive credit and refis thereon, that's where the leftovers of the fixed money supply can go after officials are through with pet projects, orthodoxies, and of course their own salaries and supportive social entourages.
 
It seems I recall remarking to my wife ten years ago, when she was earning about $35K/year, that under Clinton the money supply looked to be roughly averaged to $3K per every person estimated then to be in the USA; it seemed then that also many, many, many, males in the USA, all races/ages/professions, were said to be en masse disinterested in work or professions any more, and VAWA laws...sold on precept it protect low-income women from "trailer men"...became highly technical, so that even having a working spouse or living at home made a man "of interest" in most jurisdictions; indeed, back then, the news was full of how even top executives were so abusive by specialized legal interpretations...yet "tariler men" seemed to go about for at least some years thereafter. Perhaps it just seemed in this but one topical scenario that money for some was being found by putting out of cultural relevancy many others, amid a tight actual USA money-in-circulation supply; perhaps the innuendo afoot today that immigrants could prosper, if "too many well-off everyday nationals" gave up their "multitudinous high-paying jobs and careers", isn't just illusion masking ongoing march to an equity and personality-free culture where some "nomenclatura" passes out even the right to bear a child or reside somewhere...like the need to uber-police all males has been since 1994.
 
One sure way to dispel any such forebodings might be to actually hear any local, State, or Federal officials actually saying that there will be money for people to earn by jobs and business pursuits...not just by officials apparently thinking only of deciding how they would like to see the money supply set while an entire culture becomes permanently collectivized outside traditions of individualism. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Does Obama Theater Really Present:"Quo Vadis, Status Quo"?

Boy oh boy, that Barack Obama sure sounds like a messianic putter of cash into your pockets, but who may need help of more immigrants (and suppression of current nationals/immigrants by uber-police and personal forces) to do it. Meanwhile, the Democrats are poised to make Conservatives, Lieberman, and GOP disappear. Oh, what a thrilling time to be an immigrant, faith-based Church goer in which the messiah’s wrath will be spared you, or both!

Hey…wait a minute! Aw, this is just the same emotionalism we saw under Bush, and it’s not going to change anything except dramatis personae, if that’s all it is.

Bush wanted uber-powers over everyone, most fell to Courts, the terror watch list was to make multitudes feel all were one “you!” at a time yet together so shut up, no money went into the money supply, BRAC and recruitment centers closed despite ads, police enforcing border and everyday laws were scandalized amid departments de-funded, ditto port security, States and Towns handled DHS their own ways, and immigrants were told trabajo/arbeit/work exists but first more cheaply-made housing must infinitely expand, many more need come without end in sight, and what work isn’t claimed tossed elsewhere compassionate or atoning nationals/immigrants still here will give shirts off their backs so ever-new immigrants have public aid, public healthcare, and home/car credit; the faster this is done, the faster all will get ahead. Bush also bailed out industries/Wall Street repeatedly, to no demonstrable improvements to personal little guy economies.

Enter a savior and his apostolic political party, announcing the Kingdom of Change among us. As if God dwelt in no-trail electronic voting machines or bits of chad, or angels through ACORN did His will, this Ark of the Newest Covenant (reverse side of “contract with America”?) manifested and was discerned as holy by gifted if faith-funded clergy. But yea, they doth soundeth of tin.

As being chosen by God was of no legal moment for Bush AS President, neither is it for Obama; his calls for personal civilian security forces in lieu of military/police/national guard, especially since no force jurisdiction(s) fitting the Constitution/States Rights will be found, will never obtain to funding; pending, however, folks in local governments who have been doing all Bush work will carry on as usual “as GOP block a better if same way”; not a cent shall be added to the money supply, yet we shall all be promised if we all twist at each other somehow we’ll reap wealth once the USA is nothing but new immigrants living the same or lesser way as endlessly more are housed; Bush may have cut taxes more to hide holes of taxable things, but the Kingdom of Change shall raise taxes on the same non-existents…because it takes longer to notice blood doesn’t come from turnips as the race to the bottom continues. Oh, and who will want to be invidiously called a “filthy racist/nationalist/child porning/fill-in-the-blank”, what with ever-lowering of “some evidence” beyond double-hearsay as “cause” for charge (many already splash on TV at indictment but media usually forgets dismissals, you know)…see, BUSH just said he’d call critics of ANY official’s policy “sounders in or emboldeners of terrorism/enemies of the USA”.

In sum, at present it looks like Obama and Democrats are poised to continue a domestic Bushworld, meaning only the style of name-calling and emotionalism will change to cover the fact that WHOEVER winds up majority USA residents, still, no matter how many come or not, not a dime will be added to the money actually printed and put in circulation (and electronically represented when on cards/bank records). In return, foreign leaders will provide food and fuel for those sent here, as they and USA officials deem necessary for non-military purposes in fact, and as such officials deem necessary for a largely non-working culture. This appears to be prevailing attitude on NAFTA, CAFTA, and related acronyms.

So far this year, some bipartisans at State levels now insist upon lowering evidence that people are “assisted” in suicides (CA); some say immigrants and the poor will be paid $1,000 to become sterilized while well-offs will receive child-having tax breaks (LA); some say the Federal government should own ALL USA homes (Sen. Clinton, NY).

Where money is never to exist in such ways as it may be earned through commerce or work, it seems logical to muse the social paradigm marches toward: “bailouts” that are more contracts to provide goods on government call to quota collectives; “bailouts” that are more to provide healthcare as government elects; government regulating overall residency limits; government regulating how many may have spouses of ANY nature; government regulating who may reproduce; and government deciding who’s pregnancies should be disallowed or ended to perfect the species (beyond rape or Roe v. Wade intents)…like all the “greatest” societies have done re empowerment and personal rights, despite mere appearance such cultures were idle, mean, attrition-based, and aimless.

In fairness to Obama and Democrats, and to all the GOP before and amid them, I have no crystal ball past Inauguration Day, but hope media and pundits of the moment are wrong about an impression the new actors will be performing “Quo Vadis, Status Quo?”.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Himself Does NOT Claim Divinity.

The plain fact is, if any government leaders at any levels were to opine as or in the nature that any one or combination of them were some messianic will of God against which all must fall, by force or administrative manhandling if necessary, the USA Constitution and well-settled Supreme Court opinions thereon indicate no one can be compelled to comply or be “adjudged unholy”, even if all or most clergy “backed up” claims; no one can be compelled to confess any belief or disbelief, and no one religious viewpoint can be foist upon a single person by any government nor can one be excluded for any belief or non-belief simple.

 

Thus, such messianic or similar clerical assessments, from a Vatican nun saying Obama’s the good one to vote for, to a Jewish Congress Member saying Obama “is an organizer of people like Jesus”, to Muslim Farrakhan saying Obama is a messiah chosen in election victory as part of a divine plan, on to infinity, on the whole form absolutely no basis under USA legal doctrines for USA PATRIOT, HR 1955, 287g, nor any similar martial laws against civilians; nor are they a “nexus” or other cause of action for punishment in any civil or executive/administrative senses. 

 
And indeed, has OBAMA yet referred to himself as the scourge of Almighty God upon earth, or is this just malarkey to stir up emotionalism and distract that Thanksgiving event shopping, let alone Christmas/Ramadan/Channukah/et al shopping, is still way down, as if all cheap gas for now indicates is a lot of folks pent up for a year, now just free to drive like teeneagers and hoping to at least have some fast-food...like Summer gas tax provided a "surplus with subsidy through non-use" for three months, this aimless driving is called "economic resurrection", and Obama stopping drilling not yet fruitful upon inauguration will "explain" why gas spikes through the roof?
 
Surely, Obama himself is earnestly setting about divining how best to change as people expected, not just asking Clinton pollster Rahm Emmanuel to see how little folks here and yet to come respond to clergy calling Obama divine and "but for fill-in-invidiousness souls who must be bound after being loose so long" will soon have better than Socialist-like housing communities for them and many more to so be saved.
 
At least, one surely hopes so, as even the Donald was on FOX today saying even HE can't get credit already, let alone smaller guys with good ideas across racial spectrums.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ANOTHER USA President Chosen By God?

On here local CLTV, and currently as readable at http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/obama/1270217,CST-NWS-farr10.article , Louis Farrakhan is saying that Obama's victory was "directed by God", and that apparently God wants him to not himself or by Congressional "hamstring" use money for the South or anything else Louis doesn't approve of, because Louis represents in nature of all Obama voters of color want is money to have a chance at life, and all Obama voters not of color want to do is admit they are too well off, could lose easily twice what they have now what with everybody from Christians Bush through Daley ( in fact, would gladly give away all to atone and wear sackcloth while ever after beating selves with stones ), and want all nay saying to this silenced as a vast right-wing conspiracy against the will of God...who obviously created "vessels of wrath" damned from birth anyway in such folks identified by their counterpoints, and who can thusly be squelched and otherwise brushed away as expediency suits.

You know, Democrats and all their neo-evangelical boosters, including Farrakhan, chafed at the very mention by Bush several years ago that he felt he was appointed by God; um, no matter your secular and/or religious "-ism(s)" or not, still, aren't we all a part of the same money supply-base economy and thus hope therein; and do most Obama voters REALLY feel that way as a matter of God's will "approved by clergy and sent on for discernment by the laity for agreement as article of faith"? Come on, the unchurched of all stripes and races and preferences greatly outnumber ALL USA faith-based pulpits put together.

 

Everyone, including Minister Farrakhan, has an absolute right to their peaceful exercise of their religion...yet no religion is actually the faith: a faith is Islam, Judaism, Christianity, what have you, based upon set principles which all commonly reduce to doing the right, merciful, and soberly fair things by and between yourselves, believers, non-believers, every person you meet without bias of any humanly possibly nature. Calvinist or Puritan "vessels of wrath", term as identified even by former renowned Baptist minister and writer/educator Harvey G. Cox, meaning folks you can enslave or do away with or as you please in God's name, can manifest in any mere religion's practices, membership decisions, scope of social service entitlements, and subliminals...whether you want to exclude from play around a fixed small money supply, or advocate slavery, or silence pointing out your promises don't work, or you're a defender of faith like a Pope called Hitler or bin Laden calls himself re Islam, on and on it goes...yet, NONE have anything to do with what the actual faith is about, and could be why, again, so many different faiths' people for DECADES have voluntarily made themselves "unchurched" while claiming to be Muslim, Christian, Jewish, what have you.

 

Plato (427-327 B.C.) believed that earth was of divine origin and that souls existed, simple; Seneca ( 4 B.C.- 65 A.D.) said "religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful". Obviously, these two men were reflecting back even before the dawn of Judaism, and themselves existed before even Taoism or Islam or Christianity...they do however establish there is nothing new under any age's sun that officials try having cake and eating it too via manipulating what a religion (not faith) can be made to look like.

 

I had great hope when I saw the 240,000 invitation-only Grant Park crowd cheering Obama election 11-04-08 included leadership of the Universal Life Church...doing the right thing by all people its only credo; I hope that such faith will not see Obama and Democrats continue huge money funding of religions even the unchurched diverse majority of Americans don't visit, nor see Obama agree or state that he is in any way of divine makeup or design per officialdom, nor see America have Bush's Third Term via simply inserting "swarthy conservative-lapping scum who KNOW we're right on say-so about litanies of social bads kicking folks out of economy/hearing" instead of "swarthy scum who embolden  or provoke terrorists and enemies of the USA with their flapping liberal-lapping gums".

 

Stopping government mega-millions for religions which provide "social justice/poverty help"...in ways which would appear as mass Socialism if handled by government directly...might be a step in the right direction re true change even the unchurched large majority of Americans could believe in. 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive