About Me

Name: Republiservative
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

China: Only Thing Global "Right-Populating" Can Do Is Grow.

If one is reflecting upon the year and recent times this Holiday season, they may breathe a sigh of relief that once again, Providence has gotten them through yet another huge round of foreclosures, layoffs, closures, and so on.

Per a recent Chinese newspaper account, the Chinese government says it’s not investing in the USA, and that most countries on earth won’t be either…not because of LBGT treatment, health care, global warming, religion, racism, nationalism(s), and the slew of wedge issues, just because global governments have no money and don’t care (http://www.shanghaidaily.com/article/print.asp?id=423054 ).

In the USA, it’s said that unemployment will expand to pay China et al, but the relevant story says not much about China being concerned about or expecting or receiving returns anyway.

In these times, it’s worth remembering that the needy, foreclosed, jobless, and people on any kind of benefits always “know what they’re doing, and are irresponsible”. Something to think about, as all 2010 election and media wedge baloney will take place against he financial picture China just painted.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Copenhagen: Flashpoints Of Evolution Or Just Global Con Artists?

There’s a philosophy beginning to take root in some global political realms such that many officials are, although never before thought so in their lives or those of their forebears, as or in the nature of new life forms…much as homo habilis (wherever distributed with whatever looks)was superior to cro magnon, homo sapiens (wherever distributed with whatever looks)was superior to homo habilis, it appears that we have a new human species in our midst, one which doesn’t claim to Godhood yet is in every way superior in mind to most people while continuing to otherwise appear the same as others…this new species is homo officialianis.

According to the latest emerging modernist doctrine, this new human creature is part of a global upgrade in evolution; in fact, some, as actor Wil Smith recently noted, receive Nobel Prizes for work done in recognizing their efforts on behalf of their “breed apart” yet noble stewardship of less fortunate creatures; this new breed of human is so new it goes only by the name “flashpoints of human evolution”.

Through tight reigning of monocultural global populations, these “flashpointers”…being of a higher mental evolution than all other talking monkeys…rightly leave in the dust all law, traditions, systems of knowledge, commerce, you name it, where same are rooted in “the best the minds of lesser evolutionary value could contrive”. To them, God (let alone diverse spiritualities in response thereto) is a hoodoo, something the smaller-brained types (including, e.g., Bing Crosby, William F. Buckley Jr., William P. Clark, Thomas Jefferson, Martin Luther King, Gandhi, the Dalai Lama, founders of Yale and Harvard) clung to as a mere device of political differences of opinion, as if to elevate themselves as man-gods over other talking monkeys like Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin, you get the picture; also, religion being but just one sign of “retrograde” intellect, many tiny-brains used to think they could survive Depressions together, and yet individually have dignity, worth, and almost limited capability to invent, dream, and achieve healthy international relationships…in the old days BFE, what COULD all-equal talking monkeys do but presume some God or whatever was over them, they being the highest form of life on earth, and respect each other as best they could?

With the advent of “flashpointers”, from China to the USA to Canada to Latin America and literally everywhere, no more talk of Calvinist ‘separation of wheat and chaff’ or Raptures or Fourth Reichs or re-institutions of royalty; if a “flashpointer” is a new and irrevocable next stepper in human evolution, obviously anyone not regarded by “flashpointers”, their media, or necessary private/public epigone as “evolved” must by such standard be deemed sub-human…see, only new models survived in the ancient past, right? So naturally, global “flashpointers” know best how to make it seem this or that “spiritual superstition”, LBGT community, racial group, Ladenists, or otherwise needs to be warehoused with situational treatments then no better than any other sub-humans receive(and “throwback reproduction” limited), as the mass of now-sub-humans  breathe their last making way for evolutionary progress.

Now, “flashpointers” have no idea where the first-of-first universes came from; goodness, they can’t even produce jobs or balance a budget, and many (not all) were formerly (?) the most party-animal, duty-shirking creampuff punks there ever were (though “egotism” is common to them). To be fair, everyone from Barack Obama to Hu Jintao to Vladimir Putin to Chavez to Lula and so on seems content not to claim THEMSELVES as “flashpoints of human evolution”, at best, if at all, letting such talk OF them fly without direct denials; too, maybe it’s coincidence that only “flashpointers” and those they hold tight reign on or bail out in ever-worsening economies are the only ones who can be aware of themselves, and ala apostolic succession theory pass that on in dubbing (from the vast pool of retrogrades)who should not be called sub-human and allowed to play with the New Breed…unless “distemper” is discovered later and some brutes one day are no longer warm and fuzzy.        

Only those believing in current ongoing human mental-only “flashpoints of evolution” can explain in depth how this separates them from all other life and its history, or why they express no greater knowledge than anyone has done over and over…and without miracles and such to boot. Heavens, no official or admirer thereof on earth has yet figured out how to make one tiny drop of new water…we’re STILL using the same water here for eons, and if “we dummies” could build nukes and go to space, why can’t the new ubermenschen wave greater wands than ours? 

The here foregoing is not a religious reaction nor is of essence political; it is philosophical counterpoint in rebuttal to an existentialist, Ayn Rand/Adolf Hitler form of eugenics propaganda that ANY person or official on earth could embrace or reject.

Myself, I remain happy knowing my own alleged “advanced intellect” is utterly useless…nonquam…if I use it only for myself/epigone, and will earn me bitter judgment of God if I don’t try to use my gifts in building up ALL souls on the globe in positive, civil, traditional human ways…and encouraging our fellowship in such pursuits.

I hope this makes clear what I mean to all people of every stripe when I continue to say and wish from the essence of my soul: “Merry Christmas! Peace And Goodwill To All!”

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Essentials Of ANY Propaganda Anywhere.

Josef Goebbels, besides being a dude who sat even 98% of the National Socialist and other parties on their ears, was originally a student of romantic (including mythic) literature; he received a PhD from Berlin University in 1921.

Goebbels said that propaganda does not have to be intelligent, it just has to succeed; he otherwise knew propaganda to be that which facilitates the triumph of personal leaders’ will.

By “not intelligent”, sure, thugs with rubber hoses on posters saying “do it or else” would be propaganda; but most usually, unintelligent propaganda means that stagecraft/cinema/media event which is either grounded in no evidence that should be there (opinions only made), or ignores data which tends to negative what the pomp and circumstance/talking head opinions blurt about.

A rhetorical example: say a State, the SWAs of which are part of a Federal unemployment system, aks its regulated professions to make outrageous enticements to pull in people (formerly with good wages, but now in foreclosure, stamps, etc) on UI extensions with no real experience; next, say regulators know a charade of completing necessary initial licensing/registration forms and ephemera will be included but nobody will have employers submit (contrary to apparent law); then, say as “newbs” such new hires are run ragged or otherwise made to leave the new jobs; next, maybe many such employers don’t pay for training “made pursuant to law” on applications they know they won’t submit, nor pay for first work done; last, say the State’s SWA ends UI for all such people as they”quit”, otherwise refuses to pursue wage claims for them, and regulated agencies back up that mindnumbingly even by the tons no such people “did regulated work” so no ticks to employers; now say as a result UI claim figures go down, and some official(s)prance around saying how messianic they must be just to have a low figure and be thus improving lives, “need we say more?”. This example would be “unintelligent”, as the officials’ claims would be based on an absence and further contradiction of certain facts.

For more on Goebbels or the communications philosophy he merely engendered, visit fifth heading down “Propaganda Minister” at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Goebbels .

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

“USA Today”, Are Catholics/Protestants REALLY Superstitious?

Remember how this Spring Congress “had” to ever-after bailout Hollywood, inter alia, so any amount they claim (especially for movies fitting government political agendas) moviegoers spent will at least LOOK plausible? Unless there’s a reason(s) they were so bankrupt they needed FedCash, which they STILL get despite claim today of “record profit year”.

Then there’s the other “permanently bailed”, broadcast and print media. They’re the ones who disbelieve anyone could be interested in anything they don’t report, or needs to have specifics to back up claims. Such media usually tell us there’s no global monoculture…the USA President du jour is very popular with foreign (e.g., Norwegian European Union types) officials who tell their people they need to emulate the USA economy/rights protocols, while our President tells us we need less rights, central Fed control of all life, less commerce, even more houses, less citizen input (only “spam” questions them, right?), and so on as “appeasement” to foreign officials to keep our officials popular with them…and in letting officials alone reaping “bounty” after “bounty” ourselves like we ALWAYS do “but for racism” and other gender/ethnicity/familial abuse polemic rodomontades. Just ask Dr. Phil how crazy you are to ask questions, think “monoculture”, or wonder why Obama and pals never walk their own nations’ streets to “prove” turnout popularity with what some term mere commoners, sub humanity, and surplusage.

This pretty much leaves us with media which only reports on what makes officials look good, or to inveigh across broad psychological swaths against critics when the masters they’re lap dogs to get peevish, paranoid or irked.

Consider today’s “USA Today” front page story “Mixing Their Religions”. It represents an attack on the Catholic Church on circular logic that because many superstitious and non-Christian spiritualities exist in opposition to or unconcern with Catholicism, Catholicism is both dying and offensive and “should see the writing on the wall” (or at least have its members be thought of as superstitious).

Three attacks on Catholicism (and thus Christianity) are therein made:

1.       Inveigh that longtime Catholics of every stripe are against anybody not spiritual as they are, hoping to keep folks away from Church and invite animosity to Catholics (even Obama’s staff said they’d call Priests gay who oppose them);

2.       Inveigh that people of other spirituality do not give up their beliefs when “pretending” to be converted to Catholicism, so even bin Laden (on Obama-Pakistan cash?) or other folks the already socially phobic fear might be Catholics (another stay-away cloy); and

3.       The entire Roman Catholic Church and the Gospels it’s founded upon are superstitions, so any Christian is a mindless boob puppeteered by the Pope or even Protestant clergy in mere political opposition to all-powerful officials and personal comforts they seek.

In sum, as a cat’s paw to raw power, all “USA Today” did through its story is reflect Communist China’s policy of government installing Catholic clergy/bishops of its own, calling ANY other spirituality other than government’s “superstition” and political, and being upset so many worldwide continue to convert to Vatican theology.

As a Christmas present for the personal comforts of every USA official, USA Today was just helping Obama et al stay immensely popular with foreign leaders emulating each other on what “properly” is and isn’t spirituality…then setting spiritualities against each other, or attempting to de-energize Christians, or both.

This is why, on International Human Rights Day, I laugh at yet pray for USA Today, and wish dignity, peace, fellowship, and the blessings of God to ALL people of goodwill on earth. Other  than that, I remain as much as a "mindless boob" as Roman Catholics such as William F. Buckley, Jr. and Bing Crosby.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Seasons' Greetings With Foreign Hymns, With Apologies For Democracy!

One of the things we keep hearing even into this Holiday season is how President Obama represents the USA has a long history it must atone for abroad, globally, and now ol’ Republiservative in the spirit of global monoculturalists offers for free links to politically corrected great hymns of other nations’ past, hymns which lost face due to assorted world faiths, democracies, and especially the meanie USA:

“The Red October Hymn” as Lev Trotsky swooned over!  (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnpEgAYrzGM&feature=PlayList&p=1F263438A86EDF01&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=4 )

Remember that German funster of 1934-1945, who was billed as a messianic leader leading a religiously elite SchutzStaffeln in ridding earth of all subhumans? Well,  let’s apologize for USA and all prior earth’s good people who shouldn’t have bothered the nice dude, and listen to his Nummer Eins Hit…

“Deutschland Uber Alles” (Complete with reminder footage of His Fuehrerness and “clerics!)

( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEdoLKknCi0 )

Who can forget the similar style anthem of Iran as zany funnyman and Imam/Jurist replacer MyMood Alibabjihad sits on folks, just like ol’ Dolf did, making Iran as fun for Iranians and earth as Dolf did for Germans and the world, while crooning….

(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFGL7gI9u_E&feature=related )

And to wrap it up, let’s listen to that democracy-oppressed China, whose only hymn other than this is that anything they don’t tell their folks and earth is anti-government superstition:

( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQFEDdaG64o )

This Holiday Season, as if most people had social phobia (http://www.socialphobia.org/whatis.html )and would rather go to a movie than talk to a passerby, work, or go to a house of worship, let’s consider what getting behind Obama’s call for atonement and joining in could mean for global prosperity.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What If Obama IS Right About Culture?

President Obama has this year represented that his critics should just shut up and let things lie and expand as they are; you know, he may be right!

Yes, there are a slew of critics ranging from his own party to secular to religious objectors, but does anybody notice that they’re all running out of money, as those they claim support them (at least in petitioning or opinion polling style) also run out of cash, credit, and aid? Most importantly, does anyone notice that most people just want whatever degree of consumerism is meted to them until it’s “their time”, without thought of or to anyone else and without real expectation the New Culture will change or fail to touch them? So it goes in Illinois, Tennessee, Oregon, Idaho, name it.  

It’s as if most USA folks of every origin collectively say: “Yep, it’s global totalism now, what from money to anything else is out there FOR us to do besides peck at each other, watch sports, and go to movies until it’s our turn to go? They’ve taken global rights, personal economic control, creative aspirations, property upon which to build or retain houses of worship (indicating a non-existent, dead or weakling Creator) and need for ambition or even exercise away from most of us…even foreign dictators have always needed someone to dictate TO, let’s stick with the statism, the sports/celebrity/talk radio fan as the only group dynamics left to us, and maybe they’ll take more people ahead instead of us…yeah, it’s crummy to be a kept State hamster if a pollster asks but really, do most of us even seem capable of taking time away from our sports, movies and managed consumerism except for ‘tea bag moments’ and election year blogging?”.

If that or something close to it IS the reality of the majority population, then President Barack Hussein Obama is absolutely correct that most people don’t WANT to be educated, work, create businesses, get married or care who is, otherwise be equity parts of society, or have liberties protected…in such case, don’t blame atheists, Hu Jintao, Osama bin Laden, Democrats, Republicans, Putin, Satan, God, whoever; in a democratic Republic, where the majority of people do not care what needs to be done even to them or their children to permanently simply exist (and no more), and have a pattern of being self-absorbed armchair quarterbacks letting everyone else fix everything even back in “better times”, then even if critics of the government make scholastically lucid, legally sound, and generally accurate gainsays or constructive alternative plans these are NOT things the majority public wants…and though it’s extreme to label critics generally as DHS report fodder, still, critics need to see Obama IS giving the mass population what it wants as it manifestly partakes of handouts with minimal grousing, sort of the way one feeds a cat and might get hissed anyway yet the cat submissively returns for more.

Indeed, it appears Obama critics need to face the reality that they ARE “revolutionary” in nature, where they transcend ministering to shrinking numbers at all interested in hearing about peaceful alternative life philosophies or religious living; Obama critics need to accept that most people today would rather re-arrange their aimless day to see the OSU Ducks vs. U of O Beavers “civil war” football game than help or even talk to a stranger, or than picket the State capitol for jobs 24/7/365 (in a State with massive unemployment, more coming). Now THAT’s putting the body where the soul truly is, all such gamesters’ faint mewing notwithstanding as they freely act in the nature of trotting next to their keepers hoping for more scraps…Trent Lott’s book title was too limited, as it seems “Herding Cats” is not just for the Senate Leadership anymore.

Wherefore, the spirit of Jesus through Gandhi through Dr. King is manifestly kaput in today’s USA, and thus it might be nice if PACs and Churches/Similar limit talking to their own choirs…we must stop the “concept revolution” against ideologies the manifest USA population wishes to tolerate. To keep face with the Hegelian notion that ANY system (including secular) which does not admit of unbelief is a mere convenience, I would respectfully submit that hermeneutic peaceful religions and ministers respecting the USA State as giving the majority population what it wants (including LBGT marriage, less labor, CCA and other imprisonment for distempers, military escalations, aid to Ladenist nations, abortion, and actual or perceived moral relativity) should not be included as being “false religious” or barred from assembly/expression due to their own opposite views, and that their admittedly minority actual adherents be able to object and withhold their service(s) on conscience grounds where enough secular or other parties in simpatico with the majority are easily available.

Folks, those of us who want to resist intellectual or ethically rhetorical “evil” today can do it but one way, if you’ll take a sober look at reality: if you see it, don’t do it yourselves; if you give money to a PAC or Church, expect it will sustain the choir alone at best; if you’re going to “make” an unbeliever(s) hear you, no matter how “compelling”, even Thomas Aquinas would tell you harming unbelievers is against the will of Jesus and God (“Summa Theologica”, Volume Two, Part Two, Question 10, Articles 1 through 12) unless they force themselves upon you in your physical person (actual personal attack, only force enough to stop it kosher)…and secularly, even I would detain the true armed, egocentric and dangerous.

After all, in this economy at a time of sluggish Christmas sales and rising domestic abuse, who packs in more of those attendees and viewers: Lou Dobbs, the RNC/DNC, some union, any nature of any faith’s Church/Mosque/Temple/House of Worship, or Autzen Stadium in Eugene, Oregon for the OSU v. U of O “civil war” game? (Hint: Statewide here today, ala those 1936 Mercedes touring cars back in Germany’s Dolf Days, all you see are fender flags for either the Oregon State or University of Oregon football teams.) Fans, if you feel a bit the same the next morning, please don’t vent on others or officials; and again, even I would detain the socially lazy, egocentric and dangerous.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How Qaeda Pays Off USA For Billions IN Aid To Its USeful Idiots: YOU Are The Ones Obama Should Watch, Just Like DHS Feared!

Look at certian email homepages today; all abuzz that Qaeda's number two puke disapproves of Obama's first few months. Oh lordy, is DHS right NOW...criticize Obama or Dems or any official(s) ANYWHERE, and YOU are the radical suspect?

We all know China, Bush, Obama, and many others give bazillions of our and IMF money to Pakistan, the Taliban, and so on, while Qaeda obviosuly gets more guns, swords, cash and credit than any of us. But if one of their henchmen who "can't be caught, just hates Jesus, do as they say!" says HE "doesn't like" Obama, who wouldn't believe the ones Qaeda takes money out the mouths FROM aren't going to be "recruited" by them?

This kind of Qaedamontade is pure garbage, insofar as anyone who might try to get us to think complain about jobs, help the homeless, don't act as Office of Faith-Based Initiatives says, worry about mortgages/credit/schooling/healthcare quality, and DHS will coordinate a Federal down to local pounce on YOU...."radicals".
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Some Job And National Security: Govern Like The Folks You Save Immigrants From.

Another academic set of observations I respectfully submit as a concerned USA national and voter, in that it examines what partisan concerns have directed to me for approval by Democrat House mail as represented through the latest email edition of "House Call".  I consider everything on weight of inbound-only immigration re the West and USA not seeming, through assorted pundit and candidate exhortations, to yet have helped one iota the cause(s) of folks such pols say need "compassion" or "liberation" from...including TV ads for feeding starving children abroad with such ads now so old, they have grandchildren themselves; one considers also the success of uplifting jobs, agriculture, dignity, and so on by transporting as many immigrants as one may as rhetorical "bait" for commerce ( or stopping jobs from leaving the USA even through living room for swelling inbound populations takes precedence, which even some GOP candidates appear to espouse) and fixing everything by assigning expedient unity, rights, and freedom as top officials take notion, and trickle down through sub-federal levels so that the perfect State is arrived at through constantly using European Union Parliament Article 13 type muscle to ensure "unity" behind "practices which will keep us safe and not provoke those abroad hating freedom or taking criticism well"...even, say, if per Article 13 of the EUP and the notions of the PSE Socialist Group therein extremists are encouraged to jihad by little more than a promise of a home, credit, welfare, and so forth ala Atta, and even if thus not even Islamic terrorism is made to wither and AUMF-type subjects are supported against troops fighting them. 
 
It seems obvious that Socialist Hitler and Socialist-like Communist leader Stalin governed just like each other yet that alone brought no real peace bewteen them; another example would be that prior to Henry VIII of England, most of the globe's governments were either absolute chiefs or absolute monarchs, all governing the same ways essentially, yet history is rife with its own examples that just governing like EVERYBODY else...even in a totalist sense...has not per se been even close to a guarantor of internal prosperity nor of peace bewten the rulers of nations.     
 
Yet per relevant Speaker Pelosi PSA, simply going with the flow of and in the nature of foreign governments will not provoke them, and bring immigrants and nationals alike unity, rights, and freedom...even if Obama's campaign were to say or imply floating "attitude adjustments" will be needed to make sure the "right" folks of any moment are placated (as opposed, say, to something that benefits the manifest whole at once and in line with the purposes and intents behind the Constitution in the first place).
 
I say this as the PSA begins with a statement that Democrats will demand Bush release oil from the USA strategic reserve to help Americans.
 
Already this election year, it was Democrats who insisted upon hiking the gas tax with no known (public, at least) tether as to what such funds would be used for; one giving benefit of doubt merely assumes the tax is a way of ensuring oil will not be diverted to strategic reserve from general resources of same...i.e., the tax is merely to ensure gas prices rise high enough to prevent gas station losses for momentary decreases to public fuel for building reserves.
 
Also this election year, Democrats have blocked drilling in ANWR, which would only "disturb" about 3,000 out of 17 MILLION acres; concurrently, Democrats say it would harm the poor wiiddow Caribous or whatever, and yet they applaud and beg HIGER PRICES from Chavez, who with Lula has turned much of the rainforests down there into New Urban Socialist housing projects and gerrymanders of oil pipeline...no complaints from Libs or Democrats yet about poor wiiddow fishies or whatever there, and worse, Democrats want LOST which ala Norway would allow Iranians and Chavez types to control our own natural or acquired oil resources and sell it at at least TWICE the current USA pump price average...and leaving THEM in control of our ability to help ourselves or anyone else, including re job and commerce production.
 
Wherefore, there being such suppressio veri and suggestio falsi of the Democrat party and in particular a PSA today entitled "House Call" from Speaker Pelosi's office, I respectfully submit as a USA national and voter that I do not support the concept of letting the very parties causing jihadists to have diplomatic immunity, and those causing emigrations to the USA and the West by decades-long and never-ending oppressions and bad managements, stay as they are and convert the West and USA to their style of governance...it seems wholly counter-productive to the very polished stories and promises those encouraging it make, for not only USA nationals but every normal person on the face of the earth.
 
A good alternative might be actually funding production of biofuels and ethanol SOMEWHERE in the USA, so that all possible jobs to be kept or "baited for" in the USA might not suffer due to lack of fuel consumed by drivers, that drivers soon not be out of ANY fuels anyway, and that the USA may have reserves any rational nation would desire...no need to govern like others abroad just to aimlessly squeeze the earth's last drops of oil from them, and hope nobody notices.  
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What Obama Really Means When Asking You To Learn Spanish.

When Barack Obama speaks and quips things like "learn to speak Spanish" in re immigration policies, it helps to be from Illinois, Chicago in particular, to understand his political cloying.
 
He is the extension of Democrat Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich, Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley, all the other folks similarly minded (e.g., John Stroger Cook County), and their business orthodoxy. Let's call them the "outfit".
 
This "outfit" obviously envisions for Illinois...no matter WHO wins what, in that new laws are being called for with effective dates BEYOND election day...little more than a deepening of the edifice you see here today; the only difference to them is that if a Donkey Symbol is in the White House, it's Clintonian nirvana all over again with no prying eyes of the Federal Justice or other department(s), re pesky things like, oh, Constitutionality of anything Illinois "outfit" will do.
 
So naturally Obama tells us all just to speak Spanish, in part to try and whoop up incidental and untethered racism of all non-Hispanics against Hispanics, whom places like here simply use ala say medieval serfs to live on completely government-owned and literally sheer-will governed social trappings. As to "commerce", only "da outfit" and necessary foreign controlled business will occur, everything else "make do" for everyone else on ever-descending basis re quality, from housing to food and medicine.
 
Already, there is still pending the Illinois Religion Reformation Act of 2007; now, ala a mini-version of HR 1955, the Governor is preparing to sign a bill which will invade the province of the Judiciary and lower the standards in State Courts for ANY evidence of ANYTHING; Mike Madigan is calling for a hike in the State income tax; and of course, Obama last week said he'd be willing to push for Federal contractor (i.e., faith-based initiative providers) based on being the "wrong" religions as known only to him...oh, and let private employers fire anyone on like grounds on whim.
 
All of this includes local orthodoxy commitment to continuing in support and concert with European Union Parliament/PSE desires for diminutions to European and USA nationals to bring in either Muslims or Hispanics or Africans to said nations, give them the ultimate in housing project lifestyles, then exult ACTUAL jihadists with lifestyles ala Atta...so their USA and Europe will have SOME means of causing trouble without looking like it (q.v., Pakistan, Qaeda and Pashtun), while "nobly" standing on nationals (and really, immigrants) in the name of standing AGAINT terrorism which of course "brews where even credit and wellfare are given to idle hands" on a global basis. The goal is to SPREAD bad economics management of Mexico and the crummy bits of Lula/Castro/Chavez across the entire western hemisphere, in "da outfit's" mind.
 
To reiterate, when Obama or anyone else infers there's just bare racism, xenophobia, or nationalism afoot and they're just nice guys and gals trying to help those with DREAMs, they do so in avoidance of just what sort of society they arrange. Of course, wouldn't it be handy if folks would just get lost in debating such a canard than an actual agenda?
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Kucinich Call For Bush Impeachment Questions Clinton White House Iraq Intel.

I have just accessed within sender email account for today; present at said inbox is a Kucinich PSA informing me that he will call for a floor vote of impeachment against President Bush today, likely as within is sent, based solely on mere allegation Bush manifestly misled anybody into war with Iraq re Saddam Hussein.
 
I respectfully remind the Ohio Congressman that President Bush et al could at worst, in the aftermath of accomplished 911 by al-Qaeda members on top of numerous WTC bombings, be construed only as rationally extrapolating cautions against Hussein, in that throughout the Clinton Presidency Senators like Durbin and Gore (and never reneging as Vice President Gore) insisted that rather than worry about al-Qaeda, all efforts should be directed against Saddam Hussein based on NON-AL-QAEDA factual Hussein support for terrorism and threats of his then well-organized military against the USA and world...again, this is best exemplified by 1992 speechifying by then Tennessee Senator Al Gore as currently reviewable at http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=9JE48XHKG64 .
 
This abiding desire to harm and distract those who disagree with the European Union Parliament's insistance that al-Qaeda and linked jihadists not part of the Hussein paralax or nexus is patently insane when advanced as a way to "neither submit to terrorism or risk national security"; only AMPLIFIED in lunacy when such folks then urge treating ALL Islamic jihadists as "honored diplomats, no matter WHO they blow up or kill" while using either ACTUAL European Union Parliament Article 13 (as approved by same's Socialist Group PSE), or USA House-approved HR 1955, to clear nationals and other immigrants to appease "diplomatically immune" terrorists.
 
Through Congressman Kucininch's call for floor vote re article of impeachment on allegation Bush misled re Iraq, it would seem to explain the 1992 et seq Gore inter alia Democrat war drums against Iraq and Hussein, Democrats today would have to admit Gore and relevants used THEIR Presidential-level influence of intelligence to make Hussein look worse than al-Qaeda so that European Union practices would not be stopped even at risk to USA national security ala claiming Atta et al were LESS threatening than Hussein.
 
As a purely academic point, and in my own personal opinion expressed to you solely as a USA national and voter, I respectfully submit that I continue to concur with President Bush that the "what ifs" of pre-2003 Iraq invasion were arrived at by the President's good faith analysis of data which included the Clinton White House national intelligence estimates inter alia.
 
I see no basis for impeachment of Bush or related as Kucinich now calls for both as protection of al-Qaeda and distraction that some in assorted levels of USA government are planning USA adoption of European Union Parliament styles of Islamic et al terrorism appeasements.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Missile Shield: To Defend Freedom, Or Jihad Joe In Transplanted And Dicey Cover?

One could make a case that perhaps the Obama/Wes Clark/Democrat protocol on future nature of USA industrial-military complex is to ape the European Union Parliament's ways of dealing with Islamic terrorism: use sweeping powers to re-arrange nationals and regular immigrants, regardless of commercial/job/alternative fuel/regular fuel/farming land sacrificed, let in the avowed and even ONGOING Islamic jihadists, give them a mainstream life and keep it up even if they kill more in your country, then use email spam/church attendance/race simple/whatever "some evidence" you feel to sweep up any immigrants or nationals NOT Islamic terrorists...'cause even if two guys in Nowhere Earthpoint across the globe drop a cherry bomb down a toilet to spite poobah X and his local nose picking tax, if a Jihad Joe in Europe or the USA says a European or Hispanic or USA person "appeared to be getting alleged spam despite tons of personal data terrorists hack or steal as identities", gee, HOW could Jihad Joe a-knowed that unless some Hispanic or USA national DID request contact with him, like Jihad Joe says? Better go detain or rendition that bad immigrant or national, and give Jihad Joe a raise! Oh...and get us a missile shield in case China or Russia or whoever also mis-understands why USA officials would want Islamic terrorists treated with kid gloves and almost global diplomatic immunity, as USA BRAC goes forward and they'll only blame USA, European, and Latin nationals (possibly some Africans) if a bona fide terrorist hits China, Russia, wherever.
 
That might explain why folks like Al Gore went from sounding cogent and sober about defense and foreign policy ( http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=9JE48XHKG64 ), then is taken today ala http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_ASjFzi7J0&feature=related , and Democrats have become so pro-Qaedan recently as to include public expression of elation they're outing faces of anti-terror operatives FOR al-Qaeda (
 
Democrats promise the same essential feel-goods they did with John Kerry in 2004, and themselves in 2006; we've gotten a Democrat House to PASS HR 1955 as sweeping local and State powers to effect any immigration including Jihad Joes, 287g to make continued immigrant presences at whim of Mayors, Bill Clinton did NOT oppose sub-Federal gerrymandering of re-arranging nationals to accopmodate Atta types, there HAS been 911/prior WTC attacks, and Democrats DO insist we must appease Jihad Joes under any circumstances; one ponders: "why?".
 
Perhaps bloggers can figure it out, because media like Sgt. Schultz "See and know nuss-zing!!!" like LOST/DREAM/or Obama and Democrat pro-terror and HR 1955 talk; Democrats are busy superimposing Obama over Kerry '04, GOP from Lott to Hagel to Vitter to Craig and more are "leaving the field" again (as Lott said re 2006), and poor McCain/Conservatives/GOP claim they can't get a voice out (hey, does that make THEIR supporters "of interest" for alleged "no voice" simple, maybe going to Churches, too? No recourse is one of the terrorist profiles)...even though they have a President who could easily use network TV for any address he felt like giving on any topics.
 
Plus, if we all "vote Democrat" or "vote GOP", if both parties basically agree in joining Europe re immigration as Jihad Joe appeasement and cover against nationals and plain immigrants, umm...WHO would be left besides ALL or MOST of this November's voters to so find "of interest" or otherwise in re aping the European Union Parliament ( http://www.socialistgroup.eu/gpes/media/documents/47230_47230_terrorism_fin_070710_en.pdf).
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Gun Rights Not Best Barometer Of Racism Or Foreign Policy.

I've heard many on the Left these last couple of days suggest that the recent Supreme Court decision overturning DC's gun ban somehow is proof that activist right-wing Judges are trying to stir up a culture of death and racial violence through such ruling; some have suggested further that ala Iraq this proves right-wingers want to put loaded handguns into the hands of possibly deranged, rebellious, or citizens who might not get "courage" to speak or act without one...like those who say gun violence would increase but for their bans often say; on the Right, some suggest somehow a right to bear arms in private life is hugely popular .
 
Well, I am a so-called right-winger of actual...not just social...Conservative personality; I have long ago owned handguns purchased in strict accordance with then Federal and State and Local laws, and since 1983 have had no employment which required such lawful possession (and rules for carrying) such guns, so I way back them sold them to licensed dealers and never replaced them with anything; I have all my life thought only military, police, regulated protective services, and to a small degree persons in wilderness apt to encounter poisonous snakes or rabid large animals even need ANY gun in today's modern societies; I have always believed that if the framers of the Bill Of Rights meant "persons" they would have said so, instead of "the People", in re ownership of guns for USA defense...sort of then intending unless you were in then large external frontier wilderness, you had to stow and not touch a gun unless a call came from the government; and I believe in the death penalty for citizens overstepping the purpose of self-defense anytime they take life for personal power or passion.
 
Perhaps the Supreme Court had in mind that last bit...BRAC is marching right along, there's no draft, Democrats swear all defenses will be de-funded, any right not reserved to an interested federal or State government is reserved to the People directly; maybe the Court had in mind something like then letting USA persons own actual firearms simple in case a government needs them to provide militia-like, Minute Man-like first response unto infinity should martial attack from abroad occur, at least until a government reconstituted more formal means of defense. It would seem logical, in such academic exercise, to keep AMMUNITION for anything the sole right of government to make and store until, if ever, it is needed...if unto infinity civil rebellion(s) occurred, one would NOT want to sort out who were and were not "loyalists" by seeing who does or doesn't shoot at each other.
 
But even the question of the "masses" keeping even guns unable to be used seems moot, in that so many people just never have been that interested in gun ownership, and even if they were, so many manufacturers and ammuniton makers have gone out of business, the issue seems as moot as if the Court had said "You have an absolute right to wear whalebone corsets".
 
More than see gun ownership rights as some racial or other divisive statement(s), many foreign powers view guns in the hands of civilian populations as suggestive the Masses may revolt any time they don't like this or that, which kind of suggests instability and unreliability of various layers of government...the USA and Tito's Yugoslavia have been amongst the very few nations, ever, to allow private possession of weapons without official military purpose, and Hamas and al-Qaeda types have weapons but in a "permanent revolution" sense certainly inspiring no confidence in them.
 
If like the European Union the USA were to use sweeping HR 1955 or similar powers to bring in those from Qaedan and other Islamic jihad fronts, on belief paying admitted bona fide terrorists and tolerating as many death blows as they STILL would then care to make, then like the European Union Parliament one would be faced with economic stasis (not based in other than credit or government ownerships) from which at any end of social strata terrorism could arise; funded like mainstream middle-class and otherwise idle, Atta types could recruit and fly without let or hindrance through the West and strike even China or Russia; this could cause another power to question why one needs an allegedly defensive missile shield if all they intend is a stagnant society enabling terrorists to grow and attack outside the West.
 
I know recently I've carped about a lot of my own experiences re moral relativity of Illinois officials and their orthodoxies, but all I mean by same is to illustrate that they support my perception Illinois officials are dedicated to an ongoing static society as within aforesaid; to be sure, it doesn't seem to have drawn much business or job opportunities to Illinois to have so many changing rules on everything once deals or decisions are rendered, or similar moral relativities the same as IF having permanent revolution by political will rather than overt violence...and the point of it all seems to be to pursue European Union Parliament-like social restructurings and alleged anti-terrorism tactics.
 
Some in Europe and USA politics have already made it hard on our troops, and the good Muslims and others in Iraq and elsewhere, to boldly proclaim they are glad Qaeda et al are getting to see faces of those who stop their attacks even on other Muslims, and to further offer unpatrolled, unfettered free mainstream lifestyles to any Muslim who so much as set an IED against a soldier and call themselves a jihadist...let's hope that the moot issue of handgun ownership doesn't mute how Democrats and a European Union Parliament are trying to get their hands on missile shields while growing terrorism in their own backyards, in the Mid East, and globally, without concern for their own citizens, immigrants, or foreign lands.
 
I continue to support George Walker Bush re the war on terrorism, and Conservatives for national offices.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Right Wing Conspiracy Just A Left Wing Opportunism?

My wife is of Ulster-Scot descent, including on one side a slight Dutch-Cherokee mix, and is a Stephens College business grad inter alia whose heroes remain Queen Elizabeth II and Jean Kirkpatrick; she spent much of yesterday telling me it's not my style to be politically or lawfully inert just because in past some have tried to kill, maim, or use Courts against me on account of truth or views, that I would not be happy with myself ever again if I shut up especially (SHE told ME) "in Illinois where NOBODY ever does anything to ANYBODY, you just imagine it or work in cahoots with strangers", and that I would not be the man she married and is happy with were I to not at least stay with Conservatives through this year's elections...in that spirit, and while we still plan to go elsewhere by this Fall, I will stay involved through the election.
 
I see at my email today Obama is going to have three thousand "we worship YOU for change" gatherings this Saturday; he claimed to have as many last Summer, but outside Chicago most seemed to have no more than the neighborhood organizer attend; maybe huge crowds all at once across America will be flashed by all media, together with "change" specifics.
 
Two other things seem more interesting as Obama reaches out with nebulous "change" palavers...Mayor Daley, after at least ten years, has finally noticed Chicago porches fall apart on first use, most folks today with crummy porches are new immigrants, and is going to nail those "right-wingers" who built and own them; and Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan (D) is going to start suing Countrywide inter alia mostly for immigrants and slightly for nationals re giving them homeloans and expecting them to pay without having work ( which Obama will tell you itself is due to all this xenophobic and nationalistic racism because too MANY jobs exist; q.v., must go green for global warming, as long as it doesn't involve work or land to produce own fuels or alternatives against U.N. LOST wishes).
 
You know, in re consumer credit protection here, one institutionalized thing with Chicago and Illinois Democrats is the practice of doing away with centuries-old doctrines hich make employers and those serve by contractors liable for acts and omissions of their agents; e.g., I have a Court order which requires Mid America to give good references on any inquiry ever-after, but Mid America filed for sheriff door knock-down after first seeing we had all possessions and ourselves moved into Oregon; you catch them on that or anyting else re CRAs, all they have to do is say "they didn't intend their agents, lawyers, or contracted services to do that", ditto can anyone say including your employers, and just like ab initio, Courts and Madigans feel it would be unfair to then have a proper party sign a reference or relevant verification and present it to you through them as part of any record. Correlatively, although a shopbook entry in usual course, unsigned CRA printouts are deemed "hearsay" if a CRA tells the State or a Court "not MINE!"...and anyone saying it is or that's what they got? Oh, more evidence of a vast, right-wing conspiracy trying to gain political advantage, ignore them.
 
As to Illinois Democrats and Attorney General consumer credit protection over actual matter, like Daley on the sub-State level with his porches or anything else, Madigan excels at winning suits, which always have deadlines for victims to contact her for settlement shares, but too often, wouldn't you know, so many people just never get in touch with her office in a timely or well-documented fashion; comes to mind the victory Madigan won a few years ago re Household: like the one my wife got, tons of folks around late 2000 et seq got bulk-mailed live checks in amounts of thousands of dollars, which enticed them to cash it and use money for anything at all, or tear up and throw out if they didn't want it; yep, wouldn't you know, my wife and I then living in Nashville TN, no matter what proofs of content and mailings and relevant contact attempts we had, doggone it!! We were just to stupid, lazy, or both to get a "timely" claim in, just like all the other sluggards obviously working with Bush and McCain in a vast right-wing conspiracy to make good folks look bad.
 
So anybody gets a settlement entitlement via Madigan, maybe videotape what you do to timely comply and put it on Youtube or whatever as backup; wouldn't want to have your USPS proofs called part of a vast conspiracy, would you?
 
As to porches and Obama as the Lord Of Job Creation: Um, 287g also works here such that you round up as many immigrants as you set up in homes, in election years "round up and get out of town" all those "illegals" a vast conspiracy let in, put up cinder block and facade quickie little warehouses and store fronts which then remain eternally "for sale" as proof of attracting commerce and jobs, move all the "287 g roundups" to a town or State a little farther away from town than most folks go, build so many exurbanite New Urban communities with crummy porches and all, the mind reels how commerce (or structural perfection) can possibly compete with new super-fast build ups of such communities. Ususally, in "off" years, new immigrants go to the old town as nationals lose homes, process of packing 287 g's elsewhere repeats, easy election, easy big paychecks for officials...nobody gets work, equity becomes more political will than money or dignity.
 
Something to think about as Democrats eye HR 1955 to quash nationals AND immigrants to make mainstream lives for those demanding jihad against the USA or anyone else ala Atta and 9/11, instead of constraining them abroad as Bush does.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Illinois Orders This Dissident Loud And Clear To Shut Up And Get Out.

As of today, at this Warren-Newport library from which such as within is sent, there is a new procedure...when I enter the premises, the computers "go down" and need to be re-booted; this is not due to porn or child stalking or terrorism or anything else staff wishes to indicate; I came in half-hour ago and got treatment, went out half-hour, came back, found res system giving internet tickets and computers functioning, others using same; I sat down at within unit #10, library staffer again coming around telling people internet is down and he needs to re-boot (how is within done/sent, then?).
 
It's a scam because they have that Our Lady Of Humility Roman Catholic old woman "Pat" as a volunteer here, she being a perienniel volunteer here also, and both the library and RC Church ARE rather protective of Obama and Democrats, and well...who do libraries beg off to keep jobs re State funding?
 
Apparently, being pro-Conservative and civil rights and defense as I write at my "Conservative Nation" blog under Illinois at Townhall.com, is offensive to these library staffers; after all, an ILLINOIS investigator DID come out to my residence to pry after I checked out Catechism of the Catholic Church here two months ago, and my landlord HAS been sheepishly accepting full payments from me and my wife last two months...BUT withholding all services other units enjoy...aw, poor public license holder, he. Then there's police constantly following and/or stopping/shooting anyone in Cook and Lake Counties of any race who attends any RC or thereto Protestant service, the hemorrhage of business and jobs, the rise of cheap and fast New Urban housing communites, and of course the attendant mass immigrant influx treated to routine police inspections, County health service vehicles, and other trappings of minimal security prison life...at least some local officials ARE strongarming to induce more landscaping contracts, so there's SOME kind of work, trabajo, arbeit, whatever, for a few immigrants. 
 
This is all you get in this 100% Democrat-run State of Obama's, the kind of malarkey Dems hope to spread to every nook and cranny of the USA and then some. 
 
Again, it is apparent I am not welcome in Lake County if not all Illinois, for no reason(s) anyone would care to put into say a writ or charge(s) of civil, criminal, or both nature. Thus, it can only be that I am a USA national whose "time has come, again" and have to move on, now not even libraries to be allowed to let me in via creating "unrealted unavailablity" upon my entry...harassment away, like every workplace, school, park, public record keeper, Court, that sort of thing, so "nobody's doin' nuttin' to youse...youse must be streesed out...pay cut in half as top producer while folks who can't sell a thing for months are brought in at reduced but higher pay than youse".
 
Very well, but PLEASE do me the favor of accepting my notice that I'm shutting up after today because Illinois authority WILL ensure I and anyone similarly situated are gone by this next election. I know in 1998, as I stood against Mid America Management (Robert H. Baum of Inland, one of a zillion corp names on his one office) and their law firm Sanford Kahn limited, they suing for possession of a Lincoln Park unit as they just couldn't rent to anyone of USA nationality anymore, I was viciously knifed in the head and elsewhere, my head kicked 25 times into a brick wall and then left to die, no robbery attempt, and news then said folks 18-81 in same area hit same way by same men; Daley's police informed me I didn't want to cooperate, but that must have been their police order to me...my face took a YEAR to heal, and one of those men had a CPD badge on his belt in plainclothes then. Oh, yes...after leases which were timely and completely honored, and attack, the Court was kind enough to grant us monthly use and occupancy as if a lease had existed but encouraged our move away. Similar happened when it almost seemed the Court itself sua sponte served most of Hyde Park with eviction proceedings non obstante six months pre-paid rents plus timely regular payments, and so it goes when "conversion to European Union compliances" gears to the next level.
 
Did I mention CRA's here can easily report you don't even appear in Illinois no matter how long you work and pay taxes? Lisa Madigan's office told us last year they don't consider that sort of thing a matter for consumer advocacy...that's Madigan spelled D-E-M-O-C-R-A-T. Heck, I can't even be accepted here for voter registration while others similarly situated ARE.
 
I'm emailing and posting this because it's horse hockey Obama and his sidekick Durbin or in fact any Illinois Dem gives half a thin you-know-what about other than perpetuating themselves in a world where they feel outclassed by all other leaders and peoples. 
 
My wife and I will hereafter immediately set about moving to Oregon or thereto adjacent at the first instant we may; I intend to keep my daily long walks on same routes, but if no one hears from me or someone clones my ID, give me the chance to show I am up to nothing more than peaceably leaving all in Illinois to themselves once and for all, get my necessary birth and related certifed copies and such, and be out of this lovely State's hair once and for all by or just after Labor Day.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama And Pfleger Pushing Ultimate In Racism?

One sees that next on the whirlwind of ideas not tethered to causations is Obama saying he'll crack down on energy traders...let's just assume he's going to be for cracking down on anything that moves, IF it ever actually contributes to a problem, causes one, or both; surely, even Obama would have introduced a bill or something at the State or later Federal level if he actually had proof of anything he's "out to get" during campaigns only. Insofar as that, there isn't much energy stuff to hit OUR traders for, since it's all controlled by the likes of Iran and Chavez in Venezuela as nationalizers, raw product producers, or both.

As to the limitless stuff Democrats and Obama are out to get IF they ever have evidence to support such "getting", this includes nationalism, xenophobia, and of course racism. The biggest "amen" choir Obama has there is the UCC, Roman Catholic priest Pfleger, and USA Roman Catholic Bishops and Cardinals such as those in Chicago.
 
In the stunning absence of how all this organized racism and nationalism is happening, line by line, chapter and verse, Obama and his choir expect us to just PRESUME it goes on AND is keeping folks of color or tongues other than English (so you can also slap at diverse ethnics and races citizens for generations) from some 1960's or way bigger industrial-military edifice dripping with jobs and dignity.
 
That's canard one for consumption to non-nationals. Number two: the "you're all low-brow cretins and apes who need tender mercies and nurturing from the poor natures your leaders at home cultivate in you, you poor victims of your society". These days, social liberals and Pfleger types literally are banging non-stop to suggest all non-whites and foreigners, you see, are natural born killers without the mental capacity for behaving nicely...which is why, for example, it's become stylish to actually come out and say things like "oh my God! The police somewhere shot another non-White or non-citizen who, after all, was only armed in violation of carry or gun possession laws and actually was intending to shoot other non-Whites, Whites, police, oh, who cares...amen and verily, the Christian thing to do is harp about gun violence and harsher laws, then say that police are race and ethnic cleansers for even daring to think a non-White or non-national has the ability to know what they're doing".
 
See, canard one is the lure for immigrants, canard two is the "tolerance" of certain violence in the same nature as the European Union Parliament does; plus, canard two is the basis for quashing and re-arranging or jailing or whatever one's own nationals and even other immigrants, ala said Parliament's Article 13, to make room and tolerance for the violence and deaths caused by terrorists and anyone the government deems the proper party for raining havoc and death upon at-large populations.
 
To reiterate, it seems poor service to imply all non-Whites and non-English speaking people are nothing but killer drones who need tender love no matter how long they conduct ethnic cleansing at home, terrorism for any reasons, and so forth; as the Democrat 2007-08 security agenda stands unaltered to date, including by Obama and Clinton, HR 1955 to quash USA nationals WILL happen, LOST WILL give away our ability to process or produce ANYTHING considered fuel and with ot without Socializing/nationalizing all necessary business to avoid discussions, and the USA WILL adopt the same sweeping powers to re-arrange any immigrants and nationals in ways exactly like Qaeda, Hamas, Chavez, Mexico, Darfur's Janjaweed, and others do, making said folks and places something to expect immigrants to run from and need compassion against (and we're SURE even non-Whites and most immigrants want that?).
 
I for one believe that most folks can easily live in diversity within the USA and elsewhere, and don't need a life "keeper", especially in some nature of New Urban minimum security/trail by video or GPS lockdown with "income" limited to some kind of subsidy or "credit" good only for what the warden can get his hands on or feels like meting out at politically orthodox realtors and providers (GUM or "feel lucky" socialized/totalized medicine sound familiar?).
 
Let's not stoop to the raw racism, again ala the 1960's, that assumes non-Whites/non-English speakers are all bloody animals in need of keepers...and further that putting all of us together in the ultimate national housing project minus farms, jobs, and social dignity is doing more than creating a horror which otherwise has no life.
 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234Next »