There’s a philosophy beginning to take root in some global political realms such that many officials are, although never before thought so in their lives or those of their forebears, as or in the nature of new life forms…much as homo habilis (wherever distributed with whatever looks)was superior to cro magnon, homo sapiens (wherever distributed with whatever looks)was superior to homo habilis, it appears that we have a new human species in our midst, one which doesn’t claim to Godhood yet is in every way superior in mind to most people while continuing to otherwise appear the same as others…this new species is homo officialianis.

According to the latest emerging modernist doctrine, this new human creature is part of a global upgrade in evolution; in fact, some, as actor Wil Smith recently noted, receive Nobel Prizes for work done in recognizing their efforts on behalf of their “breed apart” yet noble stewardship of less fortunate creatures; this new breed of human is so new it goes only by the name “flashpoints of human evolution”.

Through tight reigning of monocultural global populations, these “flashpointers”…being of a higher mental evolution than all other talking monkeys…rightly leave in the dust all law, traditions, systems of knowledge, commerce, you name it, where same are rooted in “the best the minds of lesser evolutionary value could contrive”. To them, God (let alone diverse spiritualities in response thereto) is a hoodoo, something the smaller-brained types (including, e.g., Bing Crosby, William F. Buckley Jr., William P. Clark, Thomas Jefferson, Martin Luther King, Gandhi, the Dalai Lama, founders of Yale and Harvard) clung to as a mere device of political differences of opinion, as if to elevate themselves as man-gods over other talking monkeys like Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin, you get the picture; also, religion being but just one sign of “retrograde” intellect, many tiny-brains used to think they could survive Depressions together, and yet individually have dignity, worth, and almost limited capability to invent, dream, and achieve healthy international relationships…in the old days BFE, what COULD all-equal talking monkeys do but presume some God or whatever was over them, they being the highest form of life on earth, and respect each other as best they could?

With the advent of “flashpointers”, from China to the USA to Canada to Latin America and literally everywhere, no more talk of Calvinist ‘separation of wheat and chaff’ or Raptures or Fourth Reichs or re-institutions of royalty; if a “flashpointer” is a new and irrevocable next stepper in human evolution, obviously anyone not regarded by “flashpointers”, their media, or necessary private/public epigone as “evolved” must by such standard be deemed sub-human…see, only new models survived in the ancient past, right? So naturally, global “flashpointers” know best how to make it seem this or that “spiritual superstition”, LBGT community, racial group, Ladenists, or otherwise needs to be warehoused with situational treatments then no better than any other sub-humans receive(and “throwback reproduction” limited), as the mass of now-sub-humans  breathe their last making way for evolutionary progress.

Now, “flashpointers” have no idea where the first-of-first universes came from; goodness, they can’t even produce jobs or balance a budget, and many (not all) were formerly (?) the most party-animal, duty-shirking creampuff punks there ever were (though “egotism” is common to them). To be fair, everyone from Barack Obama to Hu Jintao to Vladimir Putin to Chavez to Lula and so on seems content not to claim THEMSELVES as “flashpoints of human evolution”, at best, if at all, letting such talk OF them fly without direct denials; too, maybe it’s coincidence that only “flashpointers” and those they hold tight reign on or bail out in ever-worsening economies are the only ones who can be aware of themselves, and ala apostolic succession theory pass that on in dubbing (from the vast pool of retrogrades)who should not be called sub-human and allowed to play with the New Breed…unless “distemper” is discovered later and some brutes one day are no longer warm and fuzzy.        

Only those believing in current ongoing human mental-only “flashpoints of evolution” can explain in depth how this separates them from all other life and its history, or why they express no greater knowledge than anyone has done over and over…and without miracles and such to boot. Heavens, no official or admirer thereof on earth has yet figured out how to make one tiny drop of new water…we’re STILL using the same water here for eons, and if “we dummies” could build nukes and go to space, why can’t the new ubermenschen wave greater wands than ours? 

The here foregoing is not a religious reaction nor is of essence political; it is philosophical counterpoint in rebuttal to an existentialist, Ayn Rand/Adolf Hitler form of eugenics propaganda that ANY person or official on earth could embrace or reject.

Myself, I remain happy knowing my own alleged “advanced intellect” is utterly useless…nonquam…if I use it only for myself/epigone, and will earn me bitter judgment of God if I don’t try to use my gifts in building up ALL souls on the globe in positive, civil, traditional human ways…and encouraging our fellowship in such pursuits.

I hope this makes clear what I mean to all people of every stripe when I continue to say and wish from the essence of my soul: “Merry Christmas! Peace And Goodwill To All!”

Josef Goebbels, besides being a dude who sat even 98% of the National Socialist and other parties on their ears, was originally a student of romantic (including mythic) literature; he received a PhD from Berlin University in 1921.

Goebbels said that propaganda does not have to be intelligent, it just has to succeed; he otherwise knew propaganda to be that which facilitates the triumph of personal leaders’ will.

By “not intelligent”, sure, thugs with rubber hoses on posters saying “do it or else” would be propaganda; but most usually, unintelligent propaganda means that stagecraft/cinema/media event which is either grounded in no evidence that should be there (opinions only made), or ignores data which tends to negative what the pomp and circumstance/talking head opinions blurt about.

A rhetorical example: say a State, the SWAs of which are part of a Federal unemployment system, aks its regulated professions to make outrageous enticements to pull in people (formerly with good wages, but now in foreclosure, stamps, etc) on UI extensions with no real experience; next, say regulators know a charade of completing necessary initial licensing/registration forms and ephemera will be included but nobody will have employers submit (contrary to apparent law); then, say as “newbs” such new hires are run ragged or otherwise made to leave the new jobs; next, maybe many such employers don’t pay for training “made pursuant to law” on applications they know they won’t submit, nor pay for first work done; last, say the State’s SWA ends UI for all such people as they”quit”, otherwise refuses to pursue wage claims for them, and regulated agencies back up that mindnumbingly even by the tons no such people “did regulated work” so no ticks to employers; now say as a result UI claim figures go down, and some official(s)prance around saying how messianic they must be just to have a low figure and be thus improving lives, “need we say more?”. This example would be “unintelligent”, as the officials’ claims would be based on an absence and further contradiction of certain facts.

For more on Goebbels or the communications philosophy he merely engendered, visit fifth heading down “Propaganda Minister” at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Goebbels .

Remember how this Spring Congress “had” to ever-after bailout Hollywood, inter alia, so any amount they claim (especially for movies fitting government political agendas) moviegoers spent will at least LOOK plausible? Unless there’s a reason(s) they were so bankrupt they needed FedCash, which they STILL get despite claim today of “record profit year”.

Then there’s the other “permanently bailed”, broadcast and print media. They’re the ones who disbelieve anyone could be interested in anything they don’t report, or needs to have specifics to back up claims. Such media usually tell us there’s no global monoculture…the USA President du jour is very popular with foreign (e.g., Norwegian European Union types) officials who tell their people they need to emulate the USA economy/rights protocols, while our President tells us we need less rights, central Fed control of all life, less commerce, even more houses, less citizen input (only “spam” questions them, right?), and so on as “appeasement” to foreign officials to keep our officials popular with them…and in letting officials alone reaping “bounty” after “bounty” ourselves like we ALWAYS do “but for racism” and other gender/ethnicity/familial abuse polemic rodomontades. Just ask Dr. Phil how crazy you are to ask questions, think “monoculture”, or wonder why Obama and pals never walk their own nations’ streets to “prove” turnout popularity with what some term mere commoners, sub humanity, and surplusage.

This pretty much leaves us with media which only reports on what makes officials look good, or to inveigh across broad psychological swaths against critics when the masters they’re lap dogs to get peevish, paranoid or irked.

Consider today’s “USA Today” front page story “Mixing Their Religions”. It represents an attack on the Catholic Church on circular logic that because many superstitious and non-Christian spiritualities exist in opposition to or unconcern with Catholicism, Catholicism is both dying and offensive and “should see the writing on the wall” (or at least have its members be thought of as superstitious).

Three attacks on Catholicism (and thus Christianity) are therein made:

1.       Inveigh that longtime Catholics of every stripe are against anybody not spiritual as they are, hoping to keep folks away from Church and invite animosity to Catholics (even Obama’s staff said they’d call Priests gay who oppose them);

2.       Inveigh that people of other spirituality do not give up their beliefs when “pretending” to be converted to Catholicism, so even bin Laden (on Obama-Pakistan cash?) or other folks the already socially phobic fear might be Catholics (another stay-away cloy); and

3.       The entire Roman Catholic Church and the Gospels it’s founded upon are superstitions, so any Christian is a mindless boob puppeteered by the Pope or even Protestant clergy in mere political opposition to all-powerful officials and personal comforts they seek.

In sum, as a cat’s paw to raw power, all “USA Today” did through its story is reflect Communist China’s policy of government installing Catholic clergy/bishops of its own, calling ANY other spirituality other than government’s “superstition” and political, and being upset so many worldwide continue to convert to Vatican theology.

As a Christmas present for the personal comforts of every USA official, USA Today was just helping Obama et al stay immensely popular with foreign leaders emulating each other on what “properly” is and isn’t spirituality…then setting spiritualities against each other, or attempting to de-energize Christians, or both.

This is why, on International Human Rights Day, I laugh at yet pray for USA Today, and wish dignity, peace, fellowship, and the blessings of God to ALL people of goodwill on earth. Other  than that, I remain as much as a "mindless boob" as Roman Catholics such as William F. Buckley, Jr. and Bing Crosby.

One of the things we keep hearing even into this Holiday season is how President Obama represents the USA has a long history it must atone for abroad, globally, and now ol’ Republiservative in the spirit of global monoculturalists offers for free links to politically corrected great hymns of other nations’ past, hymns which lost face due to assorted world faiths, democracies, and especially the meanie USA:

“The Red October Hymn” as Lev Trotsky swooned over!  (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnpEgAYrzGM&feature=PlayList&p=1F263438A86EDF01&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=4 )

Remember that German funster of 1934-1945, who was billed as a messianic leader leading a religiously elite SchutzStaffeln in ridding earth of all subhumans? Well,  let’s apologize for USA and all prior earth’s good people who shouldn’t have bothered the nice dude, and listen to his Nummer Eins Hit…

“Deutschland Uber Alles” (Complete with reminder footage of His Fuehrerness and “clerics!)

( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEdoLKknCi0 )

Who can forget the similar style anthem of Iran as zany funnyman and Imam/Jurist replacer MyMood Alibabjihad sits on folks, just like ol’ Dolf did, making Iran as fun for Iranians and earth as Dolf did for Germans and the world, while crooning….

(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFGL7gI9u_E&feature=related )

And to wrap it up, let’s listen to that democracy-oppressed China, whose only hymn other than this is that anything they don’t tell their folks and earth is anti-government superstition:

( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQFEDdaG64o )

This Holiday Season, as if most people had social phobia (http://www.socialphobia.org/whatis.html )and would rather go to a movie than talk to a passerby, work, or go to a house of worship, let’s consider what getting behind Obama’s call for atonement and joining in could mean for global prosperity.

Within most major faiths, capital punishment has been not uncommonly tolerated if sometimes applied capriciously and unpredictably.

In the historical Hindu Code of Manu (a god of black hue and red eyes), capital punishment was frequently applied per type of offense, even trifles, and could be: impalement on a stake, trampling by an elephant, burning, roasting, being cut to pieces, being devoured by dogs, or undergoing mutilations.

Old Hebrew law afforded death by stoning but in many instances also slaying with sword, spear, or dagger per mere expediency or choice of the executioner. The thought here was although Genesis said God expelled a killer, but would be sevenfold harsher to one taking vengeance against a killer, as long as it wasn’t vigilantism outside official venues capital punishment could be kosher.

In traditional Muhammadan canon (such as Laden-slacking Pakistan's State-run Islam dictates), one could lose body parts for an array of offenses, but even where fathers killed their sons, about the only capital punishment would be for apostasy from Islam (including Pakistani government policy) or to leave your own other faith for anything but Islam; also, though against Allah to kill innocent non-believers, such canon says not the slightest vengeance can be had unless another Muslim had promised protection of an unbeliever’s life.

Martin Luther in “Plass”, and even Pope John Paul II in encyclicals, stressed up to lethal force if needed could be used where one is attacked through no fault of their own (Luther excluded resistance only if in a Church; Catechism of the Catholic Church articles 2265, 2266 approve State use of armed forces and death penalty on stipulation); these leaders reasoned that without respect for one’s own humble human dignity re self-defending, one cannot respect dignity of others.

I myself feel it wouldn’t be for the interests of humanity that well-conducted and useful members of the community or world should be more exposed to deprivation of life by murder in order that the lives of murderers may be spared. But there should be dignity even for defendants taken into any nation’s or State’s custody.

Whereas common law (or “natural law” or “religious canon”) seems excellent for achieving the chancery purposes in commercial and civil law, universal criminal codes requiring charge limit (AND charging no matter “who offered who protection”)to overtly excessive physical action(s) against the body(ies) of another(s), affording real representation to defendants, providing humane execution, and according a well-formed appeals process seem best for avoiding excessive or egregious use of lex talionis and for exercising what universally is conceived as human rights of detainees in cases of capital punishment…without derogation to the essence of any peaceful faith or peaceful philosophy of unbelief.

In many halls of learning these days, it is taught that political theory of our age “requires” that candidates maintain control of “their” campaigns (to be YOUR representatives) via artificial or secondary or lesser issues vaunted as complete and exclusive proposed packages; one hears it’s coincidental when, ala CNN’s Lou Dobbs over time, reports of USA no-trail voting casting pre-programmed outcomes are proven but almost always conceded to by losers (especially in primaries where substantial prospects for nominees and often having massive opinion poll approvals ALWAYS get stomped by airy types succeeding themselves).

When that theory of issue selection by candidates-turned-officeholders becomes part of policy in any jurisdiction, obviously one sees how then such officials see the slightest whiff of interest in ANY other topic(s) betokens upset or “brutish self-interest” over public policy, thus such officials declare that since bin Laden hates policies (as well as everything under the sun) parallel inference says anyone not holding their tongues is “of interest”.

Ask any official or bailed-out-by-officials media (which could be ANYONE)or in the NICC mix of public/private “image coordination” what the official “standard” of campaign and criticism level issues has been ordained, and from Obama through FOX to your town hall, it’ll sound pretty much like all non-suspicious folks want out of life…even if stripped of all else to get it…is: pandering to paranoia everyone out there is going to abuse/kill them and/or their children; nationalistic racists of assorted races and recent foreign origins are conspiring together to make Obama look bad in saying more mass immigration just provides jobs through health care for people living in huts/mud, so enact more mass immigration to solve ALL problems; and other than this, please make sure no one’s breasts fall off, that nobody gets a flu, and that every woman or man through a woman can abort any child at any pre- or post-birth stage if inconvenient…we’re so green conscious, apart from this, we’d seek no job/own interest just to know we could live on food stamps and handouts ever-after while money remains an entitlement of privilege and office holders, as we know sacrifices must be made for the only thing REAL freedom-lovers/religious want. 

Now, let’s say you’re a person from any nation who knows that USA jobless if decorous New Urbanism is just the term our elites give to what most urbane global folks know as “global monoculture”…i.e., what you see in the USA is what you would see if you went to any African nation, China, Latin America (even Mexico!), Russia, you name it, and the value of local currency not seeming tethered to human stagnation. Further, let’s say you thus knew pretty much, elsewhere global monoculture favors young and under-educated adults, most of whom get by through sleeping with as many of each other as they can, trolling every night club and worse there is and often amid “easy credit” and gambling as they scramble to keep their homes and use anyone to “make it”…the usual result by 30 being “oh, oh, spaghettio!”, and all the nastiness USA “life losers” get. Most importantly, say you knew that most foreign people, like USA people, AREN’T what their government “favors” by handout/bailout/buyoff.

If you know such things, man, you’re as apt to run afoul of media shrews and officials’ scolds as the men/women who think it’s great to be healthy, but how do you live if otherwise you have zero connection to equity in society, national currency, or both. These things go to human rights, in any event being things which just aren’t of interest to official USA policy at Federal, State, or Local levels; where any DO claim interest, they always point to “feed the children” infomercials around for decades, saying all children and parents in Africa and Latin America live in huts and starve as tribal types…no updates to the Lincoln-Mercury dealers in Chad, the New Urbanity of South Africa through Zimbabwe, dittoes in Mexico/Venezuela/Peru/Columbia, you get the picture. Take a look at Monterrey in Mexico, for example, or the dish tv Latin program “Sexo Urbano” geared to Latin nations, and tell me I’m goofy.

So as long as it appears campaigns, official legislations/budgets, and officeholders will not consider issues other than their own, and all partisan blogs/media/people try only to jockey for slimming bucks by giving arty quips pro/con insubstantial issues, could they stop blaming anyone but themselves for statism?

I mean, in a monocultural world, every leader is really singing the same song; no, most people aren’t bin Laden or stalkers; really, Western Christians don’t have to “know their place” on human rights and such as there’s no fill-in-the-blank mass religion(s) ready to pounce on them, nor vice versa re Christians, just cult-like extremists usually finding this and that IMF funding; no, there’s no “surrender” where every leader is a co-captain of monoculturalism, where leaders from Libya to Syria to Pakistan and the West emulate or accomodate each other’s protocols on official-citizenry separations regardless of inanity ; and I for one am at a loss to determine how a USA citizen querying what nationals and immigrants alike will do for a living, once they’re all healthy and uber-protected from abroad and in everyday life, is akin to sedition, revolution, terrorism, or wing-nut anecdotal pocket designation.

 

Syllabus: humans are by nature all opportunistic; the concept of any nature of God has been vanquished by 20^th century physics, namely the special theory of relativity, the chaos theory, and the Big Bang theory in global relativity theoretics. So many people going on and on about such exact physical sciences, so many educators droning on in a priori presumption such theories are perfect, and thus such global impact on cultures having been made, face it…only a simpleton believes in God, any faith, any spirituality; handcuff, eradicate, or regulate spiritualists to protect dumb people from predators and rabble-rousers competing with more aggressive opportunistic competitors. Being good requires simply choice and measuring only by the needs or edicts of the day since a lifetime is all there is.

 Ontology-Based Metaphysical Reflection Upon Physics Of Syllabus

 The referenced physics theories certainly are relied upon by many atheists; at the same time, such theories support a certain Protestant and other religious modern concept known as noninterventionist strategy…i.e., God only created everything but ever-after has refrained from any special acts or miracles, yet God concurrently acts at particular moments without violating the laws of nature.

The blatant circular logic of noninterventionist strategy seems plain: it is senseless to say God stays out completely yet somehow gets a message(s) through to some people. As such strategy seems more a purely comparative religious cloy against the Catholic and similar faiths believing in miracles, I abandon further consideration of it except to note it supports a notion of human opportunism. 

The main points of relevant physics appear to be:

First, the special theory of relativity: measurements of distance and time vary from different perspectives upon the observer’s relative motion. Proponents of this block theory of the universe deny the existence of God’s eternal “NOW”, questioning the nature of Divine eternity and creaturely temporality.

As a stand-alone genre of educational and book-selling attack on the idea God is constantly “tuning in” on the world, the theory of relativity where used in such attack weakens due to fact we don’t know HOW God watches (or if God has human distance limitations); to “explain” God’s lack of viewership interest under Einstein’s theory, decades later physics pioneers like Edward Lorenz evolved the second relevant theory…the chaos theory of determinism.

Chaos theory basically sets forth that without need of any God, any absolutely precise input will yield an absolutely precise output most of the time, except for occasional deterministic chaos giving rise to random behavior; where a novelty emerges it has to be a re-arrangement of something commonly existent or it will be so unstable/unsuited it can’t persist…unless a decoherence effect causes it to continue indefinitely, decoherence remains incalculable, or both.

One observes therein an openness: the future isn’t a random lottery, but rather causal principles involved are more than exchanges of energy between constituents; causation is due to differing patterns of dynamical behavior or of expressions of information. No physics makes it difficult to believe that God interacts with the unfolding history of creation through inputs of active information.

Physicists ran from Einstein to Lorenz for an absolute door closure upon or at least scientifically highly implausible perception of God, but haven’t shown it there; maybe the third and final relevant theory, the Big Bang theory, will provide the ultimate smackdown of a mere myth.

The Big Bang theory says our universe created itself from the nexus of another universe, thus no God created it nor by extrapolation anything in it. 

This one’s too easy to rebut: since physics insists no matter can ab initio generate itself, where then did the very first-of-all universes come from, especially since a vacuum produces nothing? Well, physics is pretty quiet there, meaning something in transcendence of our physics is the day one initiator of our realm and everything ever in it or any predecessor universe(s). 

Ontologically Metaphysical Opinion On Human Nature Per Syllabus  

From archaic Greek and Mycenaean society (1400-700 BC) through philosophers like Hesiod (c. 700 BC), Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, and the Stoics; from Hebrew Deuteronomy 15:7-10 to Islamic Qur’an 17^th surah lines 23-30 to physical forms of Hindu karman, and beyond, in such people and texts charity, mercy, and hospitality reflect a diverse and eternal human perspective that what we call “good” is part of a Creator’s essence of which all souls are a part. 

Forever and even today, many in the world insist that no God(s) or universal power higher than man exists, thus the most ruthless must maul, deceive, or otherwise prevail against the vast weaker population, which themselves could be just as ruthless as others but for laziness, fear of suppression, or both; these kind of people insist no God exists based more on expediencies than facts, further insisting that all humans are always born with “bad” character only; and they say there are no spiritual worries if you treat those needing or aspiring to charity/mercy as surplus humanity and losers, preyed upon further by faker clergy of every stripe using made-up faiths to beat fellow pikers like say Laden out of more cash. 

I myself am not aware of any science which dispels my personal beliefs that humanity is imbued with souls all created by God, God operates in the nature of the Gospels, that ruthless, pitiless self-absorption (including direct or passive participation in or tacit mental tolerance/craven admiration for malevolent, hateful, or otherwise misanthropic egregiousness) is rooted in siren enticements of darkness, and that how you spend your life determines where God will then let you stay for eternity: eternal growth in simpatico with a God having no “need or use” for you Himself, or eternal ruthlessness of a realm run by a non-God who detests your existence at all.  

In other words, anyone can be what some call “good” without God, but only to the point, if any, someone needs the help of non-ontological licensed psychiatry to overcome bona fide physically caused impairments re fear(s) or anything else relevant, often it’s easier to stay “good” through the grace God makes available to all no matter how they perceive Him.

 

Our response to terrorism cannot be confined to a set of security measures. We must also examine our capacity to respond to attacks and focus on the prevention of terrorism and terrorist recruitment. Prevention must include fighting root causes of terrorism such as social exclusion, poverty, inequality and discrimination and political resentment.

The Madrid agenda is right to stress that "While poverty is not a direct cause of terrorism, economic and social policy can help mitigate exclusion and the impact of rapid socioeconomic change, which give rise to grievances that are often exploited by terrorists".

Fighting the root causes of terrorism must be based on promotion of universal values. This means upholding the civil liberties of all, promoting social inclusion, fighting discrimination and pursuing the better integration of minorities and migrants.

A European approach to social inclusion

We have recently seen growing social unrest in several European countries. In this age of globalisation, debate about welfare reform and a stronger European social model is closely linked to social inclusion.

In recent decades, EU member states have had different approaches to the integration of people living on the edges of society. While this has produced substantial improvement in living conditions and recognition of citizenship rights for some, new generations now face new forms of disillusionment. In most European towns and cities, these new generations experience the contradiction between successful cultural and civic integration and the perception of growing social and economic marginalisation.

Our duty as European social democrats is to set out political solutions to these new challenges. We begin with some reflection on different national experiences and promoting best practice to find new ways of promoting economic and social inclusion and equality.

A European strategy should be founded on two principles:

1. Inclusion begins not only with recognition of fundamental rights and citizenship rights, but when people really exercising these rights.
2. Fighting discrimination and promoting equal opportunities – in particular in education, training and employment – should be a cornerstone of all policies.

Promoting and developing the integration of minorities and migrants

The London attacks led to new political initiatives and a wide-ranging public debate about how to strengthen community cohesion and speed up integration.

Although all individuals have the same fundamental rights, causes of exclusion often build up. Victims of ethnic discrimination often have poor access to housing and education. This in turn threatens their job chances, bringing a real risk of exclusion from mainstream society. This lack of opportunity can help terrorist recruitment.

The EU must therefore make full use of its wide-ranging powers against discrimination. We insist on full respect for Article 13 of the Treaty and full implementation of European law in all member states.

Finally, the EU must actively promote civil and political rights, for failure to integrate and empower migrants can also help terrorist recruitment. The EU must set minimum standards for integration, such as civil and political rights, including the right to vote. " (End of EU PSE citation)

 

PSE is sort of the "muscle" for the EU, works most usually with U.N. types like Doudou Diene; the USA is always automatically assumed to be a population from which NO national or non-extremist, non-Socialist thereto immigrant may travel into PSE's world. Read for yourselves on PSE at their own site: http://www.socialistgroup.eu/gpes/media/documents/47230_47230_terrorism_fin_070710_en.pdf .

 

Obama has a lot of pols and activists rooting for him, but only like he's going to include all these folks, straight or gay, citizens or not in the 2008 Presidential election (or at least no-trail votomatics will); the only "change" so far pre-DNC Convention appears to be a shut-up/shut off forever case-closer that the USA WILL arrange as a Socialist oligarchy as the European Union and its friends demand (and would not otherwise have).

 

But, who talks anymore about Obama or for that matter his running mate (oh, that's right...he doesn't need one!)...on that point, McCain fares no better. The reason for this media was kind enough to excuse replays of Obama speeches, Democrat LOST/HR 1955/DREAM/LA offering to pay extremists, and so forth, meaning in such vacuum ANYBODY grinning and saying "change!" might be worth a shake; since USA politicians and officials are content to wait until the DNC and GOP Conventions to state what their ideas of change and progress and security are, your ol' curmudgeon and very interested USA citizen is on vacation until August 22, 2008, the tentative start of the DNC Convention (GOP tentatively starts Labor Day)...besides, even Congress.org has taken to using can't-read anti-robots on ALL letters to leaders til then, and Associated Press is crying that it will sue anyone who uses its video IF its video even if showing acta of officials and candidates.

 

Remember Barack Obama of the 2004 DNC Convention Keynote speech? As shown at  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awQkJNVsgKM , 5:06 to end, he said no USA citizens should have knocks on doors, all should have votes counted, there is more to do for USA NATIONALS, nobody expects government to solve problems, they don't want welfare waste, and even welfare people want off it.
 
Then at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1UDKXKGZ3PY , 2:56 to 3:04, Obama says the only way, however, to fix things is for Democrats to embrace a mentality that (for a period?), that they are their brothers' and sisters' keepers...so at same link at 4:08-4:12, when Obama said Democrats don't want FEDS participating in PATRIOT -like stuff, judging by 2007 Democrat idea HR 1955 viewable at http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h1955/show inter alia, Obama just meant only States and Towns should have gerrymandered say-so detention of ANYONE as Mayors and such deem fit and there ought not be a thing any Fed or President or Justice Department or Supreme Court can do about it...heck, Democrats ALREADY use immigration code subsection 287g like a PATRIOT club without trials, why not add citizens as homegrowns if a Mayor or whoever thinks folks would get touchy about re-arranging housing, costs, immigration, whatever, for "public treasury profits", U.N. appeasement(s), or both?
 
Something to think about, because back then Obama said we...all races and walks together...worshipped the same awesome God, yet does that match with today's Obama and his Chicago-based religious enthusiasts? The way some and Obama now talk, it's like while they raise all taxes (and local ones to make up volume lost to new Fed taxes), bring jihadists to Los Angeles or at least pay off foreign Muslims susceptible to extremism ( http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-11-08-muslims_N.htm ), and call non-New Age Christians and ALL unchurched bitter clingers to an old American idealism, PATRIOT should NOT watch foreign parties entering USA and ANYONE here for bona fide AUMF terrorism, sub-Federals just need to seal bat whoever in their totalist stagecraft of local social programming...via HR 1955 and 287g.
 
It really DOES seem, and Conventions surely will clear up, that Democrats adore the totalism and immigration and trade stylings Bush hasn't interrupted, it's just that they think Democrats and States should use such power for themselves on anything that makes their rodomontades fly...sort of re stinky work, don't remove the warts criticized, remove the pesty, uppity, full of overblown self-worth citizen and business critics.
 

I got so teary, watching Carlos Mencia on Comedy Central last night...he had a stage where puppets and people acted out how incredibly third-world Mexico, Latin America, and other places are, places with poor sanitation and no food and no healthcare and bare feet, on and on it went...with Mecia otherwise commenting the economy in the USA will only be "bad" when Mexicans stop wanting to come here; and then I got even tearier, watching some save or feed the children ads in re South Africa and non-Darfur nations.
 
Then remembering a Conservative bucks up and looks at situations, even a crisis, with stoic logic and judicial inquiry, I thought back how that blogger caught a Bush National Guard record that had text not even producible until decades after Bush was out of the service; I paid keener attention to those save/feed ads, and maybe it's just me, but they seem to be loops of the same kids a decade or more ago.
 
I then thought how sure...back in the 1960's when Ted Kennedy was touring Latin America and thence convinced ever-after Latin Americans, dictators or not, manage their economies against their own people in reflex to palsy somehow caused by the USA economy, much of that decades-worth of bloviation based on the Senator's and admirers' opinions on facts they don't really lay out; okay, say back in the '60's we just wanted to help out whoever couldn't make it in Mexico or wherever...back then, we had a huge industrial-military complex helping run a Free World thrive against advances of Eastern Communism, and really we just got the under-educated types like Congress likes to bait for ("unskilled", THEY say) in majority although professionals were welcome too.
 
But the USA of 2008 is about as 180 degrees different in terms of small business opportunity, grant opportunity, artistic opportunity, cultural diversity expressions in architecture and in leisure, and so on...we seem to be this homogeneous New Urban landscape no longer even farming our own food.
 
I then sampled to see if anybody out there disagreed with Mencia about Latin America, Mexico, or Africa; I sampled at http://www.visitmexico.com/wb2/, http://www.think-venezuela.net/, http://www.turismo.gov.ar/eng/menu.htm, http://www.visit-chile.org/splash.php, http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=brazil+tourism, http://www1.southafrica.net/cultures/sv-se/satdefault.southafrica.net/, http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=zambia+tourism, http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=nigeria+tourism ...you get the idea. I was in search of this great, vast third world ALL immigrants States, Cities, and Congress Members in amorphous combinations thirst for come from; but all I could find was apparent managed economies doing, on visuals, at least as well as most USA tourist and community emplacements under our own New Urbanism...what if just like here where many nationals highly and lowly educated find themselves in the same boats, many other nations just don't know what to do with their surplus nationalized human capital?
 
The wish for not citizenship but walkabout amnesty is compassionate, but only if there's something ANY immigrant COULD run home to but for third-world problems; amnesty or citizenship, if they're here to stay period, will the non-Western Hemispheres and Mid East fatwa doodlers shower us with power to have quality private healthcare and housing at affordable prices, quality low-cost food, or gasoline and fossil fuels, and no need for a stress of variable public's Big Brother, HR 1955/FISA/PATRIOT layering of government re immigrants AND nationals? A quick scan at the media and every gas station on my route today says "apparently not".
 
Wherefore, as some in Congress love to nitpick on need to investigate each other for arcane deals, or tell us symptoms of perceived attrition (e.g., marry your own gender if you have to, abort your kids, teach kids all adults are out to get them, brace for economics sure to result in marital spats and verbal abuse, et al) are of higher importance, massive immigration a mere comma in USA history, I respectfully submit those same MCs have missed even investigating and proving-up what they find to be the quality and issues of life in Latin America or elsewhere, to best focus true needs toward improving managed economies here and abroad to make those "DREAM"s of 1960's and 1970's memory a plausible reality...sort of, ala Eleanor Roosevelt, just selling raw emotionalism untethered to anything real at all, just a worn out 1960's Democrat paradigm for Latin America no matter WHERE immigrants come from.
 
Thus, I eagerly await the quadrennial conventions and Fall debates, to see which candidates will play the closest to truth, closest to delivering on what they tell us what we want to hear, and how best to defeat or drive around speed bumps of terrorism and nationalized human capital economies. After all, if it's that bad elsewhere despite elsewhere looking ala the USA, shouldn't we all at least find out that "bad" is so we can all get better together?

1. It was a stitch to watch Illinois State officials on PBS last night, droning on and on about sure...since 2005, they've been receiving road and transit funds (and literally ALL operating/salary/loan-out funds from general Federal receipts), but see, THIS year's funds are tied up because they say so, and isn't that more interesting than what they've been spending already-had cash upon or what roads have connected? The clear message: vote DEMOCRATIC if you want progress and accountability?
 
2. Presently, Illinois is widening its tollway at Gurnee Illinois, which...like the State Lottery...it wants to sell to private concerns for less than the 2005-2009 road and transit funds received from Bush; a 100% Democrat-run State, only a non-progressive couldn't see the fiscal responsibility and excelsior stewardship.
 
3. Media and the Roman Catholic Chicago archdiocese (Cook and Lake Counties) are advertising what Cardinal George feels all the social justice global immigrants need, to be demanded in a 05-29-08 march, is reunion in the USA with ALL their family members together with the same old/same old foodstamps/healthcare/subprime housing risks to them and us ( http://www.archdiocese-chgo.org/pdf/events/SomosLAfamiliadeDios_en.pdf ). The Cardinal presenting this as the Pope's will to make you think the GOP wills this due to its appreciation of the Benedict XVI the Catechisms and non-liberation theology the archdiocese opposes, the Cardinal alternatively compliments Senator Durbin et al via posing foodstamps/local government loans "paid" for by the Fed as the "dream act"...nay, God-given command and right...of global populations (again sarcastically mocking Bush re "freedom"). No one seems to mention therein that once you become a "proud American" the moment a subprime loan is in your hands, if your house gets blown down by a stiff wind or flood, hey...Americans aren't worthy of raising  disaster aid for as ANY such "proud" person is either self-sufficient or a spendthrift racist or greedy or a Tio Tomas, right?
 
4. Some Democrats, led by Illinois Senator Barack Obama, just know that USA nationals need en masse observation as homegrown terrorists, as they might fall under the spell of some GOP who actually suggest we may need strategic defense reserves of assorted nature, as ANY nation maintains...you can't draw meaningful foreign investment if you're weak to third-nation manipulations or military attacks. Obama also seems creeped out by "bitter, clinging racists" his Rev. Wright and he say are better sent to perdition, especially those in the ROMAN Catholic Church not embracing liberation theology.
 
   Well, it could be just me, but there don't appear to be a lot of Roman Catholics here opposed to interracial worship or mutual concern for going forward in jobs and such from where we all are together. But there's a lot of still-unused New Urban housing in the new Gurnee BYZANTINE Catholic Church area, which Church skedaddled out of Waukegan; wouldn't it be funny if Illinois imported Eastern (Orthodox) Europeans into Gurnee, left Waukegan and Zion to Hispanics, then "proved" two sets of non-English speakers MUST be racists based on clannishness? Stuff like that would naturally require HR 1955 type homegrown say-so maneuverability at local levels as nationals would be on the outside looking in with too many variables in personal stress-handling ability; this also explains why no one yet introduces against FISA, PATRIOT, and 287g powers allowing even Mayors to detain/disappear any immigrant legal or not (by extension of 1996 Federal law re no crime too small to get booted out even if naturalized).
 
5. To some, a police State where government either hands out mass subsistence or owns all housing and services, importing all food it can pay for or sharply raising costs/curtailing potability standards to limit consumption or breeding, seems a way to do God's will, defeat terrorists and dictators abroad, cure global warming, develop domestic fuel alternatives, and make every person on earth prosperous...that's why massively overbuilding every inch of the USA is eco-friendly, but giving Bush 3,000 acres out of 17 million in ANWR for strategic oil or otherwise is wildly out of line with soberly going green...note that some objector say police-state immigration is all the defense we need, as we've "LOST" to current or former Communists not at war with us, and to terrorists even if they can only meaningfully rebuild global-strike power in our absence from the Mid East.
 
    Rather than Mid East oil, or our own or domestic alternative productions, Bush-haters say use the green defenders Chavez and Lula, even if they HAVE denuded rain forests with oil pipelines in gerrymander AND side with Hamas and Qaeda re the USA having NO oil for reserve use; this must be because using Iraq funds for police-state maintenance at home will assure no one can hurt the USA again like on 911 or Pearl Harbor Day...if you project you care less what any non-elected/appointed people get anthrax, other plagues or diseases, or get killed, together with growing and making nothing, what can ANY foreign power gain by attacking the USA? But we can slap around serfs if they get uppity at work or seek to petition lawfully against officials' opinions, so at least people WANT to work even if no real investor trusts overall security.
 
7. Neither I nor do I perceive most people on earth expect Franciscan solutions, piety, or selflessness from their officials...but it does seem hard to grasp how Congressional agendas offered in such spirit by Democrats and some GOP meet up with possible endgame fruition.
 
Wherefore, I agree with Republican Whip Blunt that the stimulus most needed is trade; hiding from the world, reducing domestic consumer power, demonstrating unwillingness to protect foreign investments for real jobs, and engaging with dictators/oppressors abroad/terrorists seeming only to spread anything BUT commerce in and between nations, I continue to support Conservatives for national office.
 

Just ahead of the Pope's USA visit last month, PFAW was chief in a Democrat-themed attack on those who attend Churches or have Christian faith simple ("bitter", "clingers", "racists", ad infinitum); at that same time, some democrat-themed religious (e.g., Obama and Wright saying God should commit the USA to eternal perdition for a slew of anti-USa economic and strategic "reasons"); now, Catholic attack groups like America Need Fatima (a/k/a American Tradition Family Property, or TFP) are arranging "anonymous" and in-person shock tactics against theaters running "Jerry Springer: The Opera In Concert" as it offers news to the public of a widely enacted change in the faith deposit and Bishopric (including confraternally) interpretations of catechism and Scripture favoring Christ as Ghandi, the Eucharist as not real presence, God subject to human re-interpretations of what He deposits as eternal words, Christ favoring abortion, euthanasia, birth control, and homosexuality...TFP rags on those who only report if in a graphic and stylized, yet obviously effective, manner...of course, either GOP sell-outs or Democrat "socialists/communists" must be behind this "attack on the Supreme Pontiff's ideals".
 
Just as gerrymadering say USA anti-terror and interstate crime efforts, via letting each State or Town come up with HR 1955-like "criteria", is what we had before 911, it seems gerrymandering Bishopric "veracity and confraternity between branches on the same vine of Christianity" has had similarly counter-productive results and blames anyone but the source, unfairly burdening politicians of every stripe.
 
In 1992, then Cardinal Ratzinger wrote up the present Catechism of the Catholic Church, and John Paul The Great formally adopted it in 1994; can I be the only one who notices said Catechism in its John Paul II preface specifically ordains said Vatican catechism shall NOT supercede nor re-write any local Bishopric catechisms then or after in force, the Vatican only wishing to guide them? You couldn't do better, especially where most other Christian faiths essentially "ditto", to say there is no defineable and set reason(s) for believing anything at all is God's faith deposit(s) or that Christ, the Apostles, and Scriptures create a universal Church or faith...i.e., the former "eternal" nature of the Word has been cancelled.
 
At that time, the sole idea was to keep numbers up and $$$$ in the boxes, baskets, and bank accounts of drifting memberships, moving towards atheism, New Age religions, agnosticism, and such...any Bishop or Cardinal also archbishop could re-write for his diocese population, to attract whatever seemed otherwise popular to folks but not necessarily tethered to Christ. This was back in the early 1990's, and thus has no tether itself to national security, appeasing OR provoking Ladenists or Hamas or MyMood Alibabajihad, or liberating folks from this or that Latin or other dictator(s). Necessarily, as pols offered government "can't fail" faith funding to Churches which could sustain their numbers, most pols HAD to play to Bishopric dogma taught in their locales to happy parishoners...and thus voters.
 
However, over-reliance on the Hispanic vote, largely due to Catholic and ranking Protestant clergy long therein intermeddling, has led to a "liberation theology" appeasement which...as 2007 mortgage fiasco and high national costs/debts and diminutions to strategic defenses/resources show...is hardly bringing much "social justice" or "human personal dignity" to folks abroad or faith-portered into the West. And Ladenists and others lick their chops as the USA in particular fades. Things like "oh, another tsunami or tornado in another foreign dictatorship or land; let's raise relief cash; oh, the dictator kept it, bring 'em here" aren't serving as they used to, as such "goodwill devices" show even more wind or flood damages to USA residents, immigrants included, and the motif there is always "bad Americans! Greedy, too!", causing many foreigners to doubt social justice can be had if we all just listen to say that Bishop in Chavezland or Chicago's Bishops.
 
Because I perceive HR 5818, the Neighborhood Stabilzation Act, would in effect only again and more greatly exacerbate the very lacking social justice self-interested and adrift clergy allege, I respectfully again submit HR 5818 should be vetoed with such veto sustained.