We’ve heard a lot under George W. Bush about Islam; Ted Kennedy and pals used to cry that Bush had “created 1000’s of bin Ladens”; the real estate developer and would-be WTC Mosque builder, whom Obama wants as mid-East ambassador, seems among those who imply applying logic to autonomous facts takes all Muslims aback as a Crusade against Islam (even though only one Islamic school is built on such notion), with the need to watch for hits being far less due to anything in Islam than to general man-made disasters (except for BP oil spills); DHS per its April 2009 reports estimates that relative to finding 2001 AUMF Islamic terrorists and their pawns, anyone who has any criticism of any public policy sounds in Ladenist complaining and emboldens enemies to whom anyone further in economic crisis might turn to in hopes of restoring “perceived democracy”, thus until at least 2019 ANYBODY could become an AUMF target and ALL must be scrutinized constantly “as if” because they might just blame Islam for domestic insurrection, sedition, or crimes based on “perceived” recurrent economic downturns; and most public personalities paint it that all Muslims are out to destroy the world now that international Communism has ended with the 1991 birth of the Russian Federation...except for China, Cuba, Latin American lands, and such.

At the same time, even Obama says stay the 2001 AUMF course to defeat Islamic terrorism the sole subject of such AUMF, so let’s see if the way his administration goes about winning makes any sense.

As for the DHS take, even Obama’s ambassador-apparent asserts most Muslims aren’t radical extremists, and that there is a huge USA sentiment against Muslims…necessarily inferring most in the USA are not going to turn to Ladenists for anything, making it curious DHS opts to cast a net so large that what comparatively few martial criminals might even exist can study and work around overly broad systems…like everyday spammers and con artists et al do. Whereas DHS could plead cause if domestic independent agenda existed  in nature of eventually dealing with a teeny, tiny USA population having no money or credit autonomously earned or made, with planned recurrent surges in the amount of workers deemed unnecessary including for public or private charity assistance, it makes no sense to cast a net over everyone with otherwise far fewer “dedicated” types studying profile usages in crafting domestic or foreign-borne random or systematic violence in re 2001 AUMF material. In plain words, DHS seems too domestically distracted to be of true efficacy in the 2001 AUMF sense; its bosses themselves seem only to seek winning through psychology while affording DHS components whatever they ask on any grounds asked, with full awareness DHS seems distracted.  

Turning to the kind of Islamic terrorists Ted Kennedy claimed Bush made 1000’s of, it is impossible for any one nation or culture or combination or military action/non-action to be “the” cause of all 2001 AUMF terrorism. Kennedy meant people who are born into or credibly adopt Islam are as sour on the USA as are the 2001 AUMF guys, only on different grounds for not recognizing Islam is made up completely by diverse people drawing together who have violence as a part of their DNA and who need epigenetic “freedom fighter” excusal for their actions…the GOP had Virgil Goode, DEMs had Kennedy as two faces on one coin insofar as calling all Muslims an enemy.  

So who is a 2001 AUMF Muslim, and how do we tell?

This may surprise “end-times” Christians who think things popped up recently as part of the Apocalypse, but just as Christianity has Calvinist pre-determination and determinism cutting across Christian sects, circa AD 1760 an Islamic theologian known as Abd al-Wahhabe set down a draconian Muslim determinism such that Allah wills every last thing that happens to Muslims and others all over earth…from mundane everyday things to accidents to extra-judicial executions to infinity…and that there is no reason in religion or science why any government on earth should treat people differently leaders take whimsy, all global rulers doing God’s will and all further on Wahhabe’s doctrine Allah gave each race and place its own rulers and customs subject to local autocratic bents; obviously, one could be the head of any Islamic State and be a Wahhabi Muslim, not even the Taliban being creators or even necessary to a randomly pan-Islamic notion. It may be instructive to read, e.g., the 1961 ‘Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics” (Charles Scribner’s Sons), alphabetized topic “Wahhabis” as fact-check on this.

One can only wonder how western radical behaviorists, who insist not even the mind exists and that all life is pre-determined, and Calvinist preachers, are never “of interest” to DHS or their bosses, but to reiterate: 2001 AUMF terrorists are those who are or support State Islamic autocrats urging global governments to govern as they each please sans democratic principles; State Islamic leaders can force Muslims against their will into accepting and battling for nihilistic autocracy under a banner of Islam rather than the harboring or autocratic State flag; as history shows not even global autocracies are a guarantor that Allah won’t will this or that contests between crowned or arm-banded heads of States; and Wahhabi-minded State Islamic leaders and their supporters can hide behind their false epigenetic/deterministic Wahhabi claims as long as anyone agrees to conflate Islam into a “gene pool” for hotheads from every race.

My confusion therefore is: how does anyone on earth prevail against Wahhabi determinism through the USA practicing mirror determinism which further apologizes to Islamic State determinism? And whether Wahhabi, Calvinist, scientific radical behaviorist or otherwise, what is the coincidental Constitutional authority for setting a political or religious orthodoxy of determinism where such activity is not necessary to defeat an AUMF enemy?