Although I am a Christian, I recognize that as with all religion the point should be applying faith to why one does or doesn't do something...but based on objective logical error or harm that exists in a thing or proposition, and which can be perceived or stumbled upon by anyone from matter complete within an autonomous thing or proposition. Whatever faith's spiritual "commands" should not become a protected or legally valid "cause" for anything...as no religious non-aggressive spiritually religious philosophy dealing with a next life simple should be disparaged, thus no country or person should expect to substitute rational science, law, or examination for edicts of any faith at all...if for example a person says "I cannot steal" and will not do a theft defined in proscriptive law, the spiritual conscience is only coincidental if reinforcing to rationally proscribed behavior.

This brings me to several Christian groups of non-Asian construction representing to me their conclusion that the Chinese government is oppressing the Linfen Church and its followers. Again, all to me known emailings represent only conclusions without explaining if Linfen people do or do not overstep objective ministerial bounds, in the nature, say, of anti-abortionists who physically manhandle abortion clinic staff or patrons.

Wherefore, I most respectfully submit to your Honorable office my sentiments that if the Chinese government can stipulate any way(s) or practice(s) that any objectively reasonable person on earth could see as a harm to society's interests or a representative government, upon making out such case to my awareness I would not disagree with the Chinese government in re Linfen; if however Linfen Church primarily had no illogical contrary interest to society or were just teaching a non-aggressive religious view limited to what they speculate the next life holds, as modern physicists indicate the universe had a transcendental causal agent of some nature, it would seem insufficient to accuse Linfen of superstition-mongering, de facto psychology, or traffic disruptions relevant to their meetings.