I saw many USA network news shows this morning quipping (i.e., sparse or no explanations) that the Obama administration just made "the largest action against terrorism in U.S. history" (per a Eugene Oregon reporter): seizing a Mosque tied to terrorism and vitiating Citicorp Bank, that is all, viewers.

Now, I'd always be happy to hear that bin Laden were actually captured and Pakistan wouldn't get another $290 BILLION in USA aid like this April, and that USA DHS didn't think USA "alienated unemployed" through at least 2019 were no longer a "parallel terror threat linkable to Laden on top of it for questioning public policies", or that a REAL zonker to terror-war linked (2001 or 2003 AUMF) cashola had been smacked down, but nope!

 

All Obama did was grab a Mosque and its ephemera due to an old stanky Federal law simply forbidding any operation in the USA from doing any business at all with Iran since M.R. Pahlavi was exiled in 1979 ( http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2009/11/us-sues-to-seize-iranian-funded-mosqes.html )!

 

The U.N. Security Council, meanwhile, is still considering charging Israel as a criminal State against all earth's humanity, while standing silent on Iran's MyMood Alibabajihad constantly calling for death to all the world's Jews; hmm, MyMood still gets U.N. and IMF cashola, if not USA government scraps; the "what can do about Laden?" beat goes on Pakistan on USA taxpayer dole; maybe it would be a  more obvious step in fighting AUMF terror if Obama or any other relevant leader(s) actually vetoed the anti-Israel resolution, or called for U.N. sanctions against MyMood's calls for genocide, instead of indulging in group hugs, suspecting their own people of "parallel" threats, and otherwise stop carrying the philosophical malarkey forward that law must never even appear to be rooted in religious morality (even "parallel" secular logic or ethics) to have "good government" (per prevailing critical race and other theory in re law and religion).