Posted by
Republiservative on Thursday, August 20, 2009 2:02:09 PM
Assuming ‘Time’ Magazine this week isn’t acting in the nature of reviving slacking retail sales, it has a perhaps even unintentional yet present message in support of Obama’s claim the need for constant healthcare is far deeper than anyone imagines.
Conservatives, here we can even suspend the omnipresent memory that from Stalin forward, Soviet Gulags were filled with scientists, journalists, medical personnel, professors, and everyday folks themselves “diagnosed” as “mentally ill” and in some State-run “sanitariums” (or lobotomized/drugged) for the health of themselves and the Soviet Union.
This week, the ‘Time’ cover story tags to its main piece…an essay representing that no matter WHAT you eat and in any even small quantity thereof, exercise does not make anyone lose weight; it represents further implication that what you eat is all that matters, so if you’re over-weight and follow ‘Time’ obiter dictum on foods, gosh, you must have a MEDICAL CONDITION that no exercise could help...why, then, you could also be at higher risk for flu, since you're likely sedentary or in close quarters, especially if you're an alienated unemployed; why, if you caught flu, you could help spread it even among healthy types.
Well, if that implication were made or just hangs there as it does, would some rush to say come to think of it, no one has ever then choked down emotions with comfort foods? Was Alka-Seltzer wrong for years in re those “I can’t believe I ate the WHOLE thing” ads? Is it then mere coincidence so many Spandex-clad constant runners and cyclists, nibbling light or not-so-light, and having no known connection to dietary medical supervision, almost can’t be seen if they turn sideways? Schwarzenegger didn’t “flabalanche” through three “Terminator” movies et al and could have wolfed down pie after pie, pack of hot dogs after pack of hot dogs, tons of hot wings and pork rinds, and washed it down daily with ten kegs of beer while always lounging in a hammock 24/7, as because he’s “Ahnold” he gains no weight despite no constant dietary medical personnel present and without any exercise?
If that’s anybody’s picture, it tacitly infers Dr. Frist wrote a righteous 2003 Medicare re-do ahead of any concern for jobs/commerce, and this upon likes of good Dr. Howard Dean saying “amen” to a scenario where the first to get reliable government help will be all the over-weight men, women, and children of as many races and lands as possible…and heck, with Baxter assuring the 18 nations using live flu marked “vaccine” earlier this year was just a Baxter snafu and not a “practice run”, who’d care about work or question why Obama earlier this year signed an executive order barring doctors from using their consciences at all? Come on, Obama just wants all the over-weight to get government-directed care…and never you mind why all the Spandex cyclists and runners, who never usually even speak with anyone who’s not so constantly absorbed, spend the other halves of their days in government, police, fire, educational, medical/veterinary, and other bail-out type paycheck earning pursuits.
I admit that this all is speculative linking of individual facts/reflection thereon. But it’s so out-of-round to see a major organization proclaim exercise has zero value to weight loss, with such article issued parallel to Obamacare town halls, and at a time so many have had so little to do for so long DHS called them “alienated” and “possible radicals”(April 2009), that the silliness of the “Time” claim should not be taken as more than rodomontade to increase sales, or support drug companies anybody in re “Time” has investment with, or support partisans, or to deflect public minds from expressing question over why we never talk about curing the cause(s) of need for mass government care, subsistence, and supervision.
It's also out-of-round to believe that with the awareness, preparatory powers, and "make it be so" power of government, our DHS and HHS Secretaries as of today actually want to tell us that sure everyone should get a poke with a government-backed flu vaccine, but gosh darn it, somehow the flu will get a ton of folks with or without Obamacare (
http://www.dhs.gov/journal/theblog/2009_08_01_archive.html ).