Posted by
Republiservative on Saturday, April 04, 2009 2:57:37 PM
We hear a lot about how al-Qaeda is just hard for Pakistan to find, and would be placated into non-existance if we just stopped liking Israel (the reason to agree "no holocaust: ala Carlos Mencia, dee-dee-dee! They're not saying it DIDN'T happen physically and historically, they just mean no holocaust for anyone to kill Jews anywhere anytime!).
See, Mumbai is all CIA/Bush/Obama/MI-5 stuff, and if'n we all just become a habitrail societies watched by Google Earth, cameras, drones, and military police or shock police, plus expect no rights or reason to go out or criticize/complain against officials in the name of "security at any cost", Ladenism and all its allies will stop killing Americans, Muslims, Jews, anybody else...promise! It's just a rant in retaliation for Bush and Obaman vinegary you-know-what slapping re EyeRack...Murtha's crazy, civil war....look, just do what we say and shut up; have any of us ever steered you wrong?
While it may be fun for some to plant real or play-acting "Qaedan-linked" folks for purposes of "seeing if irresponsible, unemployable, ornery, homeless, foreclosed, and/or lazy Americans and immigrants are open to Qaedan recruitment against American governments", on ruse that nobody at "Qaeda Central" in Pakistan really EVER does that much on their own and needs recruits which they'll stop seeking once all USA troops leave the Mid East and Israel is offered to Hamas and Ladenists, or simply: they hate the USA/Europe and non-Muslims only, let's take a look at the veracity of THAT latest bloviation re "REAL heart of Islamic jihadists, promise this time!".
Is it really worth continuing to use Pakistan/Gaza/Hamas/PLO/Laden on foreign aid from the USA/EUP just to have terrorists who "repent, and now offer to testify against any Westerner and get them on watch lists" in re the populations from whom such money is ripped in the first place? I mean, why would anyone subject peaceful Muslims in other lands to death squads of very narrowly "religiously" defined Islamic LEADERS, then claim USA leaders need to run faiths here and clamp hard on own populations for "security in faith, progress, hope, the children, and this may include enacting whatever the terrorists abroad we pay want"?
As to GITMO, try, execute, imprison, or release inmates as military or civilian Court evidence and Judges find...why make it look like a few "bad boys" are denied rights in very limited and containable strikes, when boatloads could go there? In any event, I respectfully submit it's beyond inane the way the war on terror is portrayed through the USA media and through applications of Federal, State, and Local authorities.