One reads a story on how the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is upset with the USA and its high credit versus others like,say, China with huge surpluses ( http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1877388-1,00.html ); from the article it would seem the IMF doesn't want more global capitalist expansion (e.g., investment, trade, jobs) or expect the USA and others to stop looking to IMF for a permanent "allowance" of credit; such could mean creative ways to remove USA (and other) personal and commercial participants in the USA economy need to be had in order to "increase" dollars through reduction of hands that touch them...on a continental scale, this of course would take sufficient management via PSYOPS, police, guard, inter alia, of any population finding at least half have to go; also, such would reduce the amount of farm land needed to support the eventual small amount of remaindermen, as you don't need to feed so many mouths.

 

Of course, there'd probably be some "Rapture" scheme in the religious backwaters floating around, if such were the case.

 

Anyway, I watched President Obama's address to the joint session of Congress plus most of the Supreme Court; I watched also the then following GOP reply by Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal.

 

From the President's speech, it could be construed by some that he meant to indicate only people (of any national or racial origin) within the USA who are under-educated, slothful, schemers have lost a business, job, slipped in paying for present tuitions, or imperiled their mortages, or can't now get credit even if their home isn't in hock, and further such slackers seek to rob troops, reverse-mortgage types and their grandchildren of healthcare and education that will REALLY matter...in fact, if every brick layer to nurse to surgeon to lawyer et al who's "hurting" would just commit to one year of ANY education, they'd see how easy it would be to have their picks of a cornucopia of jobs they could be doing NOW, but for scheming...and these are hardly the types a government should be helping, now are they? At least tomorrow's immigrants may help not in "compassionate Conservatism" or "in the war on terror", but in helping God's truly beloved do the jobs neer-do-wells just wouldn't get up the snuff to do themselves.

 

Now, that last paragraph is speculation at this point, but it seems a plausible one against the totality of Obama's speech. As for Governor Jindal, he seemed to represent the reason he and fellow GOP types will turn back stimulus money is that he and they have already fixed everything fine in their jurisdictions, and absolutely nobody therein needs any help or economic growth of any nature(s). Hoo-boy, wouldn't it be funny if the Democrat coin side said "too ignorant to rate" re citizens, the GOP side said "you're not stupid or lazy, you just have imaginary problems"?

 

In sum, I submit that it may be a good idea to audit for one's own whether postings at recovery.gov inter alia anywhere near will match everyday reality, to ensure the website and attendant Cabinet staffers aren't just stagecrafting as if playing some kind of Anderson Accounting to some modern day Enron..."fine, just fine...our records show your retirement and investor profit strength, President Clinton has the best economy in years, and the last company on earth to go BK is Enron...see the pretty mixed-media corporate graphs?". Then there were those first few GW Bush budgets, all renowned for "splashing red" while doing St. Vitus' Dance in re taxes literally exactly as Obama now, and we all know THAT big-time cash made it into what it was promised for, don't we?

 

Pending, giving Obama and the almost unable to contain themselves throng of joy-stricken Congressional Members the benefit of the moment's doubt, I'm sure that if I'm wrong, those who have no liens on their homes will swiftly find buyers, all of us will have any credit or social aid we needtoday forward, and Mr. Obama doesn't really mean when a bank makes a loan to acquire property (and knows it at the time), with some "schemer" taking it on little income, the ditzy old bank should both be bailed out AND keep property acquired against he abusive, stalker-like little slacker foreclosed upon.