No matter how Obama came to be President, the fact remains a majority of Americans polled expects he and the next Congress will do things which return the USA to what they perceive to be normalcy; indeed, Obama has not yet proposed anything wildly Leftist.

 

But you look today at Grassfire, Family Research, We The People, and still today all you see is exhortation to auto-oppose Obama on composite grounds "he is not a citizen, emboldens terrorists, will wreck a humming economy, and will do all kinds of Socialist things...you wait and see!".

 

Obviously, these voices are not among those polling in the majority of expectancy of change to the positive...and remain the same voices chanting the same as ever that from government-funded Calvinist religiosity which portrays "remaindermen of the day" as chosen by God for continued income/asset valuations so turn your backs on immigrants and nationals then "vessels of wrath" or "stingy" or whatever malarkey, to "stay or courses OR ELSE!", anything that varies from their dogmatic implementations will only lower expectations from "the annointed".

 

Such voices say rights need not inure to anyone if their bailor-in-chief, funder-in-chief, or commander-in-chief says so, and that anything that's been done was collateral loss or cutting of brush in the case of anyone they themselves availed of Socialist-like eminent domains and other programs to find solutions for.

 

No, it doesn't seem credible that in a country where eminent domain of a few Churches is truly coincidence to voluntary mass non-attendance, a "Moral Majority" spoken for by government-sponsored faith strands can truly be fabricated as a secular basis for policy as if widely held views were being accomodated; no, it doesn't seem likely God wants us all dropping everything to pay for the healthcare of every person on earth, instead of relying on His own powers and grace to us to show us how to heal, so His plan for our producitve family life can be shared ...which oddly would be Socialism but for proposals healthcare companies given bailout-style monopolies would be sole providers; no, when one sells that more folks cut out means more for the day's remaindermen, too many people or something, it doesn't sound credible that same-sex activity or abortion is really of all that concern to such voices, except maybe where a fatcat's son might not be "manly" enough to take over a fiefdom, or some "barracuda" wife uses childbearing against a honcho's vaults.

 

And indeed, at present, these are the same voices which don't appear to be the direction most folks approve of any more, at least insofar as what these voices further have been claiming is right for opulent growth in personal economies, let alone re religious or social service and justice interpretations.

 

Myself, I find that about the only "Socialism" Obama or Congress could even be theortically envisioned as one day entertaining would be nationalization of the gasoline industry, given that today neocons insist it makes no difference if no link to the rest of the economy's health or USA military security can be shown, or if anyone can afford high-priced vehicles, or if like all other bailouts auto jobs are still lost...per neocons, we MUST bail the auto makers so it at least looks like vehicles are being made with expectation of sales, so oilmen can raise pump prices "to encourage all the conservation of fuel we need"...and even if then more jobs are lost due to high fuel costs.

 

This is why I respectfully submit it couldn't hurt to let neocons prate on, and later give Obama and Congress a chance to move America forward, since right now it appears to lie in the nature that "neocon economic totalism is complaining that somebody who'd de-monopolize it would be guilty of totalism and therefore shouldn't be listened to".