Local media here in Illinois were touting this morning only that the State of Illinois has $4billion it owes to unnamed debtor(s); of course, the suggestion is "crisis! crisis!" that needs Federal bailout, and of course, why bother asking what money WAS spent on or why this shadowy crisis won't happen after another State bailout, if any? In the meantime, status quo as it is in Illinois.

 

Then there's the bailout bill for the auto industry the USA Senate will take up Monday, $25 billion just for one ever-declining industry; yes, cars will still be made; no, job retention or creation aren't envisioned but unemployment extensions for out-of-work auto workers is being bandied about on the Hill, as it appears no real increase to cash customers is anticipated, at least not one demographically correct one in the USA.

 

Now, in Illinois, it seems it's still "business as usual" re the sprawl of commercial space decline, falling wages, and move to credit-based New Urbanism, nationals and ever-increasing immigrants alike; thank goodness gas is almost artificially low over per-barrel costs, as many people seem to be enjoying tooling around after being cooped up during high prices of the last year or so...but again, they don't seem to be observable buying much beyond "joyride gas". Apparently, such politically designed "social credit" will further extend into the new USA auto industry as well...as long as governmental currency Comptrollers and State counterparts direct who's politically correct to receive credit and refis thereon, that's where the leftovers of the fixed money supply can go after officials are through with pet projects, orthodoxies, and of course their own salaries and supportive social entourages.

 

It seems I recall remarking to my wife ten years ago, when she was earning about $35K/year, that under Clinton the money supply looked to be roughly averaged to $3K per every person estimated then to be in the USA; it seemed then that also many, many, many, males in the USA, all races/ages/professions, were said to be en masse disinterested in work or professions any more, and VAWA laws...sold on precept it protect low-income women from "trailer men"...became highly technical, so that even having a working spouse or living at home made a man "of interest" in most jurisdictions; indeed, back then, the news was full of how even top executives were so abusive by specialized legal interpretations...yet "tariler men" seemed to go about for at least some years thereafter. Perhaps it just seemed in this but one topical scenario that money for some was being found by putting out of cultural relevancy many others, amid a tight actual USA money-in-circulation supply; perhaps the innuendo afoot today that immigrants could prosper, if "too many well-off everyday nationals" gave up their "multitudinous high-paying jobs and careers", isn't just illusion masking ongoing march to an equity and personality-free culture where some "nomenclatura" passes out even the right to bear a child or reside somewhere...like the need to uber-police all males has been since 1994.

 

One sure way to dispel any such forebodings might be to actually hear any local, State, or Federal officials actually saying that there will be money for people to earn by jobs and business pursuits...not just by officials apparently thinking only of deciding how they would like to see the money supply set while an entire culture becomes permanently collectivized outside traditions of individualism.