Up to now, a lot of Conservatives and GOP had to grapple with the image the reason so many bona fide terror groups were flourishing in the Mid East...and peaceful Muslims having to evacuate to Europe inter alia...because Bush didn't want to let any other nations in, wanted oil control, and wanted bona fide terrorists on the other "tracked indefinitely to see how wide this or that particular thing goes"; the European Union seems to have responded with ephemera that they would not take action against European Muslims even if Mid East traced attacks occurred in Europe, as that was a brand of racism pushed by Bush.

 

Another lead weight for the GOP was the impression they were causing even Democrats around America to accept mass influxes of Latinos in such ways as to favor totalist Latin governments, in order to have Latin oil ready and avail of certian Latin friendships to Hamas inter alia, even if that meant calling this or that hemispheric group "racist" or "xenophobic" if they didn't want to go or didn't want new arrivals; at the same time, it appeared to many abroad that Latinos were merely being warehoused into a sprawling USA New Urbanism, basically displacing indigenous populations despite same's multi-racial makeup, while a relative few controlled a static money supply drawn from "commercial and immigration-based reconfigurations/valuations" and high prices, all just to use the Latin race as means to controlling say World Bank with all USA dollars representing a favored few and not an overall nation.

 

Right now, I am glad that Democrats have taken majority control of the USA House and Senate, plus Barack Obama has been elected President. This provides the perfect opportunity to show the post-Bush USA has NO interest in forming some Latin/USA governmental union along Bush lines, has NO interest in using a constricted money supply to have a few influence world economies or fuel, has NO intention of continuing it that ALL Muslims are terror candidates, and has NO special relationship with bona fide world terror groups such that a mere visit from a USA official or same's promise to effectuate such group's will elevates terrorists to world policy setters.

 

For just people in America, this should also properly be taken as the best opportunity to prove States and towns and private employers were just reacting to Bush, yes, even if it seemed Bush will couldn't be worked without them ("he could have terrorists hit us, see?")...and that from now on, no more layoffs, no more business closures without known relocation, no more blaming other nations for "demanding outsourcing" of jobs just gone to sate greed amid static money supply, no more aimlessness, no more fixating upon personality or activity in lieu of substantial action, and most importantly...no more 287g, no more HR 1955s, no more PATRIOT invasions, no more Sarbanes-Oxley, no more suppressions of ANY voices in the electorate in petition to government or in criticism, and no more suppressions of ANY Constitutional rights.

 

I'm sure even Obama and Durbin would agree in public that to expect anything else than a swift 180 degree turn from the Bush era would be to slander Obama and Democrats as being Bush's Third Term blowing smoke in front of mirrors. And I for one will most certainly give the new President and Congress my earnest patience and greatest expectations for change as promised, and hope everyone here and abroad will do the same...by looks of USA media today, it appears world leaders are even applauding Obama's ascension based on promise of change, and media are saying it's good they do, so let's all get on the bandwagon and gice 'em a chance.