When George Walker Bush, "43", took office, his first budget splashed red, indicating enormous no-strings block cash as usual to States and Towns, only bigger than even under Clinton; at that time and continuing on to date, he and every person ever to sit in Congress has had literally the same USA money supply, pro-rata or by decreases; many histrionics and interest rate and "bailout DOW" conniptions were there all along, and from 2001 forward even if gnashing teeth while going along, Congress managed to pass everything Bush asked for in budgets and even under Democrat 2007 to date control couldn't overcome him...they claim.

 

2001 forward, Bush and many bipartisans insisted tax cuts be ever ongoing, not as a mask to hide ever-declining SOURCES TO TAX, say workplaces, farms, what have you, or to mask personal economies cleaving more and more to credit and reverse mortgages immune from taxation in lieu of small business/jobs growth (even if America's Job Bank did close down July 01, 2007), but to stimulate the economy and keep it growing...all bailouts somehow detached from this.

 

Alongside, we heard about a huge war against al-Qaeda, only despite claims of cash going to it and later Iraq, BRAC keeps on keeping on, recruitment centers keep closing (despite ongoing slick recruitment ads for SEALS and such)...no cash going there; we've been told has so much factory, farm, and commercial job enterprise we could double the outsourcing Bush presided over and STILL have plenty left over for more than the workforce can accommodate, thus "mandating" more and more immigrants only "racist nationalistic xenophobes" would try to discourage; alongside, the GOP gave us USA PATRIOT and 287g, Democrats assented plus added HR 1955 and whatever else seems suitable to say-so policing and detentions of folks in the USA who don't the "truth" of economic success...has even Obama said he'd as much as pare back Sarbanes-Oxley re approval of business transactions and investment descriptions, this only seeming like even businesses have to fudge numbers up to the point they again need bailout? Speaking of corporate fudge numbers, the Federal and State governments each require every still-open business to accept resumes/applications from every comer, job open or not, or face stiff EEOC fines...just because apps are solicited or made is no guarantor of a job(s) existing...see again "bailouts", "mortgage foreclosures".

 

Some as late as this Spring in Congress suggested, on the Democrat side, we have government add also complete ownership of all ever-multiplying housing, so that equity concerns like foreclosure not happen; they say that also the masses could best be served by exclusive government-provided healthcare as the fulfillment of lofty-sounding healthcare promises. Now we hear that all of a sudden, despite the multi-racial composition of diverse USA officials, race riots may break out if Obama does or doesn't win, even though on media presumpsit he HAS won for months, no such "precursor" riots have happened. Indeed, every person native or immigrant saying they'll vote Obama just thinks he'll extinguish the "Bush/GOP bankrupting and rights-stopping martial nationalizing ways", put everyone back to work in good jobs, and stop playing nations/faiths/races against each other.

 

I concur with the thoughts of such voters. However, I remain dumbfounded as to how either Obama or McCain can do more than has been going on, what with even they thinking the USA money supply is right-sized; where they've said ANYTHNG about government fundraising, McCain says more tax cuts (on WHAT?), and Obama says raise corporate and employer taxes (like on what's left?)...which means both candidates propose, glitz and spin aside, that air is what they intend to pay with beyond the bailed-out concerns.

 

This is significant, as Biden recently quipped these "dictators" will come after the USA about six months into Obama's Presidency (time of Congressional adjournment following Obama's first splash-red budget, like Bush 2001 on same money supply?), and who knows what might happen just as the first Obaman budget was to start October 2009; this past weekend, McCain TV ads acknowledged Biden's quip, claimed we can stop dictators by voting McCain, but his ad shows Iranians and Hugo Chavez (folks who get along with Barack; Chavez even has a zillion Citgo stations across the USA and through even the Kennedy family gives charity winter gas/heating oil to the poor)...yet both the McCain and Obama campaigns let it fly that even Chavez would attack the USA to get Obama because he hates anyone who evens VOTED with Bush...one assumes is the story. 

 

Lastly, consider those stories the year prior to and during Kerry's 2004 run, stories of how the Defense Department had contracted with private military and security firms to "handle" terrorists abroad, donning their garb and practices if needed "to infiltrate and win acceptance by"...and who were sometimes denied as being contractors despite letters of appointment, and whose conduct in part led to calls for Rumsfeld's resignation. If Barack or McCain thought we'd be attacked, WHY would they let BRAC and recruitment centers keep closing, and have no draft? Neither disputes Condi Rice's statement the other week that the USA wouldn't attack or defend if attacks tried on our people as the North American Union progresses, so again, are we SURE anyone WANTS to hit us in a traditional sense?

 

I sincerely hope we're not in for some fandango ala 2001, where for some hocus-pocus, contractor/non-contractor malarkey reason(s), all of us everyday folks...nationals and immigrants...have to be quarantined, curfewed, uber-policed by armored cops/national guard to "keep us safe from ourselves or guys with what appear to be nation X uniforms", strays detained/shot on sight, and then have these "real threats" recurrently scared away by McCain's "manly veteran breath" alone, or by Obama's "friendship with Muslim fundamentalists, like Carter's, plus simpatico with Latin leaders". Just last week, for example, something calling itself "grassfire.org" emailed the public to e-petition the Los Angeles Times to release a video it claimed it had showing Obama smiling in a friendly meeting with a Muslim fundamentalist...what if, so many erasing prior Obama video clips for the campaign through to now, such a clip of him or Carter or whoever is merely shown in or after February 2009 (date air transceivers become illegal) to imply both that such a threat really exists and that Obaman simpatico...perhaps "offering toned-downed Christians" or "offering more immigrant housing over job growth" ad infinitum...is what "saves" us from it?

 

I look forward to supporting earnestly the efforts of the next President in lurching the American Dream back on track, for all people, and certainly with hopes of increasing true USA consumers of domestic and foreign goods...I'm proud of my country, and wouldn't want to offer things to beckoned immigrants and trading partners that aren't there. I just hope there won't be some major smokescreen(s) to cover that pro-rata, without addition to it directly or via infusion of foreign capital, our money supply presently isn't any bigger than it's ever been under Bush...let's not settle again for pretending it was sent and got mis-spent by this or that locality's officials.