Syllabus: Should the non-Western Hemisphere wait for USA bailout, and perhaps a new President,  to effectuate bolstered trade and cash to other nations via systems and treaties already in place?

Argument for: President Bush, and hopefuls Barack Obama and John McCain, insist all over the media that it will be so no matter how hard they have to drag Americans along with it; media seems to prefer the Obama plan of even raising taxes or at least costs from tax increases onto those already economically strained, as proof money to aid non-Western Hemisphere nations will exist notwithstanding fixed money supply generally.

Argument against: President Bush, McCain, Obama, and USA media, together with a rarified political orthodoxy thereof, are the prime if not exclusive recipients of a bailout constituting the whole of the USA money supply; a slight tax on them cannot produce enough to do much for anyone, let alone the whole non-USA world.

For at least ten years, the whole USA orthodoxy focus has been and apparently remains re-structuring North America into a hemispheric “European Union”, under working title “North American Union”; through arresting the availability of cash to cover credit, they constantly overtake private lands for purposes of re-development into New Urban and literally commerce-free towns and new towns where fields/woods stood…often, as in the case of Illinois with 6,900 agencies (most in any State), with great increases to State and local agencies which “minister” to immigrants and are very protective about inquiry into what otherwise seem public records (Courts, official business of agencies, e.g.).

No matter the USA Presidency, or political party in any State or local control, in this time a growing State and local doctrine has been to “re-educate” Christians as to “what the Bible really said day one to date”; this is because most Americans were Christian, and so were most Latinos, and an interface of mass immigration at times of seeming economic downturn (actually, planned-for reconfiguration drop-outs), “war”, or both has constantly been re-invented to “explain” how no matter the contradictions, REAL Christians are doing the right thing.

At present, about 10% or less of the total USA remains in “1978” mode, i.e. with old homes and evacuating commerce amid trickle-in New Urbanism and immigration; in most of the nation, New Urban communities forbid posting of electoral signs or opinions at all, and are populated mostly by Latinos…the Obama campaign repeatedly asks supporters to call them on phones but not visit/put up signs, as the only “ethnic” they envision for the coming era; McCain’s camp simply lumps in all voters on intellectual criteria common to all people while avoiding impression he is concerned about anyone other than Caucasians, a sop to his longtime colleague and like-minded legislator Obama.

Where people will not behave as racists, the McCain camp will do it for them, seeking to creep out anyone being or talking to anyone who registered GOP at any time in life, thus submerging them and making them “socially expendable”. Christian “re-education” around this is found in every State-funded faith: Christ provokes Muslims, who are all killers our enemy or all killers we need to appease and only one race (Arab) can be called Muslim (unless USA African American); all Muslims hate the old Christ; the “real” Christ would dwell in the Old Testament and not be described as a New Covenant, validating Leviticus and anything else similar in graphics; Christ may be freely re-interpreted as may the whole Bible without references cited, by faith-funded ministers, most of whom have psychology licenses…e.g., some Illinois neo-evangelical, faith-funded ministers quote Nehemiah liberally, and inject the phrase “move up to houses you did not build, fields you did not plow”…it doesn’t appear in that multi-small-chapter Book of the bible, and if you’re non-Latino USA national, any race, you infer God has given the power and mind to do more; if you’re Latino Christian, you might hear a blessing it’s okay to come in and pay no heed to what you see happening to nationals…after all, the State exists to protect people from fraud, you see, and funds only what the REAL Scriptures have said since Christ’s time…it’s those “bad old Christian preachers” who need to be slammed when THEY cite a Bible text, because THEY ply psychology, not the new ones who invent texts and present as suggestion for open-ended pickups favoring political split infinitives.

Conclusion: in no way(s) should anyone seek to intermeddle with or unduly influence the future direction of the USA domestic agenda. However, as expanding the North American Union amid a fixed money supply will be the focus of the next President and Congress in the ongoing attrition ways , next likely to say atheists and non-official State version religious both provoke Islam and are racist to Hispanics (who will have to confess to the “true” State religion or be threats to security re Islam, racists against African-American Muslims, or both), plus adding costs to those here while leaving no cash in consumer hands, there is not much argument for the Non-USA (including Australasia) and definitely non-Western Hemisphere nations to presume there is any credible, tangible plan for the USA economic structure to change…thus, if the USA as a national currency won’t participate in the world except for trickle-out by private parties all cash is given to at their musings, it doesn’t seem fair the rest of the world should wait to address their own monetary systemics.