Most campaign and PAC stuff I'm seeing keep telling me how race and gender are the primary focus of USA nationals, so all we need worry of is what people in the non-Western Hemisphere will think if a woman or a non-white doesn't obtain to White House entry; other than that, everything's fine, just fine...so let's go tell everybody not in our Hemisphere that they're going to have mucho money and trade upon Obama's election, except for a bunch of racists/self-haters/nationalist homophobes who'll need down-putting as other Hemisphere's populations next mass-immigrate to the USA...unless McCain,the guy who's gonna screw up all deals known to foreigners, at least, gets in and makes the world then "withhold cash and trade from us some more and invites their wrath for so doing". Eh, either way though, might as well ignore how education and stuff came to be so screwed up UNDER all people up for election or next election, and as always make closely-cropped, critic-crushed stagecrafts puffing up the rhetoric everybody wants to hear.
 
Maybe if all candidates had to go USA townhall ad-lib, unscreened (except for security) queries from USA nationals and world immigrants/tourists already here, more substance useful to all people could be heard, and at the same time together.
 
As it is, I find it hard to endorse ANY candidates for ANYTHING, not out of spite nor things of that nature, but because it seems every last candidate for any office relevant to me lets it ride that the "USA still 1960's industrial-military complex" myth is right, and also myth that the European Union Parliament is now an equal dynamo that will create jobs here if we let "some" of their "needfuls" in first; thus all I see is a choice...and a faux choice, at that...between the stagecraft of Obama as Savior with candy for all, and McCain who plays and IS played as if there WOULD be candy he could "crucify like a Pilate".
 
I look forward to any, if any, Fall debates for any specific, blunt namings of WHAT candidates things is wrong, and bluntly HOW they'll fix it (certainly, it seems nowadays we choose between campaigns needing no genesis of ideation from the vox populi anymore, just appearance of their vote thereon re what's chosen for them). In the meantime, if anybody thinks I've been askew with my impressions re the European Union Parliament, especially its Article 13 which sweeps members' nationals aside as politically expedient, and that my being "askew" extends to Bible teachings/texts in the EU, well...then let's hear my critics' recitals of what they believe relevant Article 13 text to be, and how THEY think EUP and member nations apply pressures under it; otherwise, I'll keep thinking all anybody in elected office or candidacy thereof is offering is a choice only between who WILL lead the USA into an exact legal clone of the European Union Parliament no matter what "convincers" it takes, while keying ANY questions or better USA Constitutional ideas thereon "terror-support sounding" or "slammable with made-up offenses later dismissed" or otherwise "convincing" everybody it's all very good for us.
 
Oh, and just by bringing in more boatloads of whoever en masse, without money supply increase or up-front foreign investment as usual, where will all the money be soon for all the feel-good things like medicine, jobs, healthcare, housing, education, et al, we're told are coming unless "mean Mr. McCain" interferes?