Posted by
Republiservative on Monday, June 30, 2008 3:31:02 PM
One could make a case that perhaps the Obama/Wes Clark/Democrat protocol on future nature of USA industrial-military complex is to ape the European Union Parliament's ways of dealing with Islamic terrorism: use sweeping powers to re-arrange nationals and regular immigrants, regardless of commercial/job/alternative fuel/regular fuel/farming land sacrificed, let in the avowed and even ONGOING Islamic jihadists, give them a mainstream life and keep it up even if they kill more in your country, then use email spam/church attendance/race simple/whatever "some evidence" you feel to sweep up any immigrants or nationals NOT Islamic terrorists...'cause even if two guys in Nowhere Earthpoint across the globe drop a cherry bomb down a toilet to spite poobah X and his local nose picking tax, if a Jihad Joe in Europe or the USA says a European or Hispanic or USA person "appeared to be getting alleged spam despite tons of personal data terrorists hack or steal as identities", gee, HOW could Jihad Joe a-knowed that unless some Hispanic or USA national DID request contact with him, like Jihad Joe says? Better go detain or rendition that bad immigrant or national, and give Jihad Joe a raise! Oh...and get us a missile shield in case China or Russia or whoever also mis-understands why USA officials would want Islamic terrorists treated with kid gloves and almost global diplomatic immunity, as USA BRAC goes forward and they'll only blame USA, European, and Latin nationals (possibly some Africans) if a bona fide terrorist hits China, Russia, wherever.
That might explain why folks like Al Gore went from sounding cogent and sober about defense and foreign policy (
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=9JE48XHKG64 ), then is taken today ala
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_ASjFzi7J0&feature=related , and Democrats have become so pro-Qaedan recently as to include public expression of elation they're outing faces of anti-terror operatives FOR al-Qaeda (
Democrats promise the same essential feel-goods they did with John Kerry in 2004, and themselves in 2006; we've gotten a Democrat House to PASS HR 1955 as sweeping local and State powers to effect any immigration including Jihad Joes, 287g to make continued immigrant presences at whim of Mayors, Bill Clinton did NOT oppose sub-Federal gerrymandering of re-arranging nationals to accopmodate Atta types, there HAS been 911/prior WTC attacks, and Democrats DO insist we must appease Jihad Joes under any circumstances; one ponders: "why?".
Perhaps bloggers can figure it out, because media like Sgt. Schultz "See and know nuss-zing!!!" like LOST/DREAM/or Obama and Democrat pro-terror and HR 1955 talk; Democrats are busy superimposing Obama over Kerry '04, GOP from Lott to Hagel to Vitter to Craig and more are "leaving the field" again (as Lott said re 2006), and poor McCain/Conservatives/GOP claim they can't get a voice out (hey, does that make THEIR supporters "of interest" for alleged "no voice" simple, maybe going to Churches, too? No recourse is one of the terrorist profiles)...even though they have a President who could easily use network TV for any address he felt like giving on any topics.