The Scotty-Five Thousand Pyramid "sell my book" gameshow rapid clues ( to the flutey tune 'clicking' away sixty seconds ala the relevant old gameshow ): "Um, Bush lied about even non-Qaeda in Iraq", "Um, Bush uses propoganda and actually TRIES to beat AUMF subjects", "Um, Plame WAS outted even if she HAD as public CIA job and rode buses to it", you get the idea.
 
Well, no...even if the stuff some prate on and on and on and on and on WERE true, because all they can say is "we stink, sure, but McCain...McCain WILL be Bush who's got to be stopped from not appeasing the U.N. like WE would by the way no matter costs or sovereign dissolution save for public paycheck$ for being U.N. overseers leaving Husseins, Ladens, Hamas, Chavez, brutal economies and dictators in place, et al...McCain MUST be derailed we tell you, MUUUUSSSSSTTTTTT!!!!!". See, George W. Bush is the ex-President noon Eastern time January 20, 2009, so most folks today care how the next President will view the USA economy, sovereignty, respect for personal dignity, and best ways to aid folks beset by bad foreign economic managers, terrorists, dictators, and combinations thereof. 
 
I saw on here local cable media the other day that some Chicago college students were upset because Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley was coming to speak at their commencement; it was said the students found him "mundane", with media then admonishing students that Mayor Daley is thought of very highly by populations abroad, one assumes including online communities, especially due to the jobs and farming he's brought to Chicago and Illinois...one presumes any un- or under-employed Chicagoans or Illinoisans are just then slackers, on evidence of well, just look at the skyline, doesn't it LOOK like more than converted offices?
 
So unless Mayor Daley is a racist, part of a right-wing conspiracy, or both, anybody a Democrat or related party pronounces a slacker kid or immigrant is one because there is, ala 1960's Professor Richard Hofstaedter, no reason to question a Democrat or liberal opinion, just be diagnosed as whatever kind of pervert or psychotic would go against obvious "sense of evidence".
 
Which brings up an interesting set of musings in re the barrage of "racist" and "right-wing conspiracy" hammerblows flying around Democrat campaign camps these days...what if such a then-resultant Presidency went about helping the majority or better STATE LEGISLATURES (which actually elect via electoral college non obstante popular vote) who had chosen  him or her, not to even have a military or Guard to command anymore, but to swat in their stead anyone of ANY race who was deemed "racist" or "right-wing", or not interfere with States "doing what it takes" to deal with issues, or both?
 
In such hypothetical Presidency, appeasing the U.N. or at least looking like it is the end-all, be-all of elitist wealth and power; HR 1955 and then more such say-so powers would be used to take any nationals, immigrants, or both who didn't fit or approve of "today's U.N. money-draining paradigm" on any given day of any coming year as "racists" or "right-wingers" or "non-Whites in servile obedience to same" or "non-Whites who don't like the NEW crop of non-Whites who have to be set up here in New Urbanism, like in their home nations but in the immigrant-friendly USA".
 
You could even sell it by saying, for example, if you speak Spanish as native language or hate Christians, an anti-racist, anti-right-winger Presidency would stomp on every White, every Uncle Tom, and every Tio Tomas and slacker kid or immigrant  to get you into the USA and set up in the inexhaustible wealth of the USA...hey, those nationals, slackers, and the servile to them had their chances, but even teachers, public payrolelrs, welfare recipients, police, medical, spouses, parents, what have you, have been found to be up to online porn, verbal abuse, what have you...they've forfeited their chance permanently, now get in here foreign populations so you can WORK and be all you can be with YOUR chance.
 
But as the population of diverse immigrants would swell and swell, more and more businiess and farm land would have to go, less and less space for oil drilling, biodiesel and ethanol production available, more reliance on foreign dictators and totalists for same at higher and higher prices, lower quality, or both, and cheesier and cheesier public healthcare predicated on contraception, homosexual activity, and abortion as the best path to child healthcare; and you'd wind up "proving" commerce online via something like putting up whole cheaply made business parks and buildings, to get them uploaded to say Google Earth where they could stay until "for sale or lease" signs rotted, and in farm and other areas...just forget to upload changes to online mapping systems. Maybe private or public or both prisons could mushroom too, just don't upload them to mappers.
 
For now, that's all just speculation...one sees the other week polls saying the economy topped even Iraq re voters, and since it's been "Bush lied about possible Qaeda ties and forget that he disrupted non-Qaeda business Al Gore And Durbin 1992 forward said Hussein was committing", "FORGET Qaeda is separate from Iraq AUMF", and "America's nothing but a bunch of racists and right-wingers in conspiracy"....at a time Doudou Diene, U.N. rapporteur, is in the USA preparing a report examing the USA as "racist, xenophobic, and nationalistic" for not taking more immigrants ad infinitum, and some Conservatives ask "why DO so many permanently have to leave their economies and homes and farms and families in the first place?". And it appears Democrats at the moment say it's bad to go even to Darfur to spread democracy, just airlift the population into the West and leave the nice genocidal dictator alone ( which is why they only feign upset over previously saying Hussein starved and killed and his people...the U.N. might be touchy).
 
The U.N. seems ready to yap about and confound the USA, its pols, people, immigrants, assets at home abroad, no matter WHAT route anybody takes here; I look forward to the quadrennial Conventions and Fall campaigns and debates to shed light, if any, upon the issue of why the USA economy with or without Iraq is not of the slightest consequence for any level of governmental elections.