Having the government take over the houses defaulted upon is just expansion of long-existant FHA ownership...how often has THAT been successful per se, and why would expanding its housing stock amount to other of more of the same?

Worse, restructuring debt sounds so sweet in an election, but notice it substitutes a "pill" or "bandaid" for say "improved income or job salaries or education toward same", which if expanding government housing stock and "green" dismantling of jobs, commerce, and agriculture occurs on further "need" of housing say Chavez' "surplus people" as his kind expand hemispheric control becomes permanent, what good would mere restructuring of debt be...when you eventually and predictably MUST hit inability to pay, either you toss out the debtors in the end or you take over their housing too and dictate how they'll "continue to earn through need of societal health".

For these reasons, I respectfully submit my opposition to ANY such measure(s) which through or by their terms would give effect to such conditions or scenarios...such measure(s) only artfully make permanent and expand the very status quo voters seek to minimize or remove from their futures.