EWTN will be offering complete, LIVE, and commercial-free coverage of Pope Benedict's trip to the U.S. from April 15-20, 2008. Tune in to get accurate and in-depth reporting from a Catholic point-of-view not found on any other television network. EWTN can be seen on  DISH network 261, and DIRECTV 370. Many cable television stations also carry EWTN, as does Sirius radio.Visit www.ewtn.com for the latest updates & schedules.

 

I offer this as a way to see the Pope as constantly as anyone can as he appears within the USA, hear what he says when said, and make up one's own mind if the Pope or any, if any, Catholic commentators square better with reality than those without religious faith (or at least no Catholic faith) who are trying to use "fake blood" terror swoops to "convince" us Protestants are rich little-guy haters, the Pope speaks for all Christian leaders in toto on everything they want, and the Pope is using Bush for a slavemaster military Crusade against Islam if not the global population (and that Laden is ALL Muslims so ya see hating Christianity on the demand of Laden or similar ragtags will bring Qaedan peace and no need for USA borders, ya see, and only them Christers need HR 1955 town-by-town power to pick up USA nationals who don't agree with the Pelosi-Durbin "Re-Thought" Christianity).

 

PFAW inter alia bemoan in personam to me and via USPS that quote: "they're trying to remake the USA into a Christian country!"; in that spirit, I feel it my own fairness doctrine to allow the alleged defendant Pope and Christian an opportunity to tell me and the world things without filters so we may decide better for ourselves, even if someone says "oh, but acting such point-counterpoint is like what Thomas Aquinas did back around 1220, so letting a defendant speak sounds religious and we want to be PC!".

 

The Constitutional right of a defendant to make his or her own case must be preserved, even if PFAW or a terrorist or Jean Valjean or anyone else...if that is of repulsion to anyone, and WHO's the one we shouldn't listen to re who they support? In the pendency, this is one Conservative's example of a fairness doctrine.