Amongst those generic PSAs I recive from a litany of political efforts are Democrat groups, officials, and PACs asking for support to blindly push for Democrats on bare grounds "GOP in in contest area, GOP MUST be bad influence, vote Dem, see all gold and securtiy and equity and dreams be yours....yeaaarrrggghhhhhh!!!!", or perhaps like a sports team fave, we're just supposed to vote for the best perfomers whether or not they, like Academy Award winners, have any actual tether to what would serve or even be public interest.

 

Now, even those in the GOP know I like to ask tough questions of THEM, and I find I'm not flicked away over time for the mere doing of same; in the non-Conservative and often Democrat arenas, it's as if all plugs are pulled on you for asking or opining anything other than a belief that whatever Dems say must be taken as just shrewd ways to get in like a steamroller past the GOP gatekeepers, Dems of course then freed to not actually do what they've said on Congress floors or otherwise but unleash wealth and jobs and ad infinitum for ALL of us, let alone this or that collectivized group(s) as PC dictates; um, so we forget that's never happened before, or that what then they've said as pre-election rodomontade will be ignored by foreign powers seeking useful idiots re not including the USA in global commerce or events?

 

Dems and non-Conservatives currently rush about selling us essentially that the entire globe hates the USA, based you see on Bush failed policies; they're hard-pressed at present to prove that up beyond Islmaic terrorists hating us Carter to date, so it seems Dems are pushing for a pastiche of bills and treaties combining to say if the USA doesn't just surrender to forces only Dems at present can see, and further so naturally accept the dictates of ANY even remote and tiny nation that demands our commerce, jobs, housing and resources, we shall be extinguished by the entire world massed against us as one...ah, finally a Dem offering of why they believe in a Freudian interpretation of the doctrine of determination re domestic affairs, drafted along Herman Goering's line that if you tell a people they're under attack they'll follow you blindly. 

 

Yet, heck...you can't even get Mid-East nations to agree with each other between themselves without diplomacy; and Ghana is about to launch attack, too, perhaps? Japan is aiming silos at us? The list goes on and on re debunking the world's ready to strike unless DREAM, SCHIP, and LOST go through....a pastiche creating little more than a USA that accepts sit-at-subprime or government-owned-home folks gone green without jobs and hoping they can get that next refi, while the rest of the world goes about life and we all live on their fumes and lees.

 

But again, because Dems say we WILL have absolutely every nation at once destroy us unless we accept Chavez for oil (he's a pal, he gives gas and oil so cheaply...oh, that's right, our multi-pocketed Frias is a Socialist dictator who NATIONALIZED all resouces and production, so he pays nothing to produce...most generous), turn from all other fuel to ethanol grown and produced only outside the USA, have a Socialist society, understand we must never work again, and function as if all elected officials combine to form the so-and-so coulmn of the Fourth International of the World Socialist merely tending us to main Socialist dictates, they now stand on LOST, as if President Bush cannot have troop funding without it (and how the heck is Bush so expensive over the next ten years, even though way under Dems' proposed $3.5 TRILLION at minimum tax increase, anyway?).

 

All LOST would do is this: turn over rule and taxation, without input and need to receive taxes back, to any nation on earth who sends a bill, no otehr "validity" of bill sent; boy, THAT would eclipse even the $3.5 trillion hike, huh?; presently though, Dems use it to hook their GOP friends across the aisle and USA public into believing we must do SOMETHING to show this hateful world the USA has no ill intents, and surrenders and offers up its people regardless of immigrant/national status and resources to any for the asking, even if pleasing to bin Laden...must avoid drafts and war, ya see; of course, in 2008, that waters down amongst usual mudslinging-a-minute to "Folks, Bush and the GOP just have got the world really upset because they're not honoring treaties, and we Law Party Dems promise you our simple compliance with ALL treaties will bring so much opulence to common folks so vote all Democrats and save the USA and world....yeeeaaarrrrrrggggghhhhhhhhhhh!!!!".

 

I respectfully submit, however, that then after 2008 and a Democrat or other sweep on such grounds, what most likely seems probable is: A) the USA begins to spend untold credit at untold costs in a Socialist serfdom like the world has never seen paid for only by USA inhabitants simple, or B) Democrats refuse to honor such pastiche of giveaways, thus becoming the very thing they accuse Bush and the GOP of doing...only Dems ARE promising the world populations, and so setting it up for provocation and foreign manipulation continuing domestic status quos when apparent Dems were kidding. Well, at least that plays to inevitability of a sort and is one consistency with non-Conservative PSYOPS.

 

Wherefore, I continue to support Conservatives for 2008, in that most Democrats and non-Conservatives have not yet convinced me that their political transmogrified to  legislative agenda could ever lead to better jobs, healthcare, arts and sciences, more exports AND imports of goods, or cogent stewardship of national security, the national debt, or promises to and dreams of ALL the people of earth contemplated by the framers of the United States Constitution.