Some recent progressive PSAs I received same are typical of this "litmus test" philosophy which seems focused more on who some folks like rather than what all the lot of us out here, together with the LBGT or all immigrants or any of us in any combination(s), are supposed to look forward to re things TO be doing or protected in; at any rate, as long as this LBGT thing isn't yet another "special victims, or ala Biblical stories some ram's blood on the doorways of a special group so that bad things coming will pass them and hit everyone else" nature of Leftist origin, fine...but again, I think it's enough to simply say gays and related are not to be excluded from the rights and protections EVERYONE is entitled to...and if some take umbrage with the concept that LBGT people LEGALLY are no different from us, I would find it quizzical some say LBGT should be able to marry like us yet somehow not be part of what the rest are experiencing; whenever PC comes to mean "Pro Collectivist", you're darn sure I'm not such PC.

 

After all, since many LBGT cases involve "proof" of such preference(s) being as subtle as having a wide stance in a latrine masking latent desires, one hopes not only that ENDA won't have a collectivist goal or State or local application, but that it won't encourage non-LBGT men and women to say they are non-heterosexual just to be included in the rights of society or otherwise participate in society...I understand, for example, Senator Clinton would like a bill passed saying all must have government-only healthcare or they cannot be considered for holding even the most menial of jobs, yet the Senator is silent on how to increase job-growing locations in the USA, so "say you want this or you're out" HAS been displayed by modern progressives, same being folks who want the USA to do all these things to surrender to enemies real and largely imagined, as if under fiats of containment from conquerors only they can see...as one progressive, a Senator from my own Illinois, will not wear a flag and per USA MSM today will not hold his hand over his heart during a pledge of alligiance to the USA...even if an official, not mere citizen or private party, charged with such affiance ex officio, indicating his disbelief but not objection the USA exists as the Constitution organized and intended the duties of government.