I know I have, as a USA national and Conservative, joined in reasoning against SCHIP in form vetoed on grounds it sounds in the globe's historically failed Socialist health care simple; it is convergent that such SCHIP as vetoed comes as some tell us the mass immigration and movement toward going green without societal or property equity, begun actually under Clinton, will somehow bring global peace and save us from global warming at no diminution to the lifestyles of those so telling us...even if no specific enemy threat(s) directly linked to ending USA industry and military as surrender or capitulation can be enumerated, and even if such "keeping you and your children at least SAFE and ALIVE!!!!" strategem always buoyed by some form of high-interest easy credit on empty specifics is the same as when the same voices said it was to empower minorities and women against males in jobs/commerce, later to empower immigrants against those with jobs/commerce, then to show compassion so the world won't hate us, then to help us drain potential "personnel" who might be so poor they'd join Communist or terrorist militias against us, and now lies as a pretty much "just the way it will be and we've got on our scopes trained on you" scenario for some.

 

It is fascinating to watch Gore-type hypes and media screeches lose sight of the fact those who tell us the movement toward comlete USA Socialism-LIKE culture is an inference-only "necessity" to "appease" SOMEONE abroad, surely, while officials and partisans who tag onto same rush about at once alleging Bush even made up Qaeda 911 involvement to Iran jihadists love the USA but for Bush, yet so alleging as they write bills seeking their own style of military expeditionism as if there IS a 1960's or bigger industrial-military complex to so act once we leave the war on Islamic terror and obligations to Iraq...it may even confuse foreigners as to just which of them is accused of being surrendered TO since they are not in nations against which AUMFs or greater exist.

 

But in just trying to chip at SCHIP from rooted in manifestly non-existant for purposes tobacco use taxes due to small smoker population daily banned, and due to its confusing Socialist innuendos, one thing I've not heard is: even if SCHIP as vetoed were overridden, what if anything would be the cost to USA healthcare workers already employed; that is, how would cleaving to government-only as service and medication provider and sole mental health adjudicator impact all medical personnel in the USA as we reorganized into such new sole system?

 

There being no such study report(s) known to me personally, I therefore continue to support President Bush as he battles both with undercuts to his or any President's diplomatic efforts and efforts to override SCHIP veto.