I thought it was sad that a MoveOn PSA to me today had to stoop to offering people five months stipend payment to push anti-Iraq rodomontades, thought a WESPAC VoteVets was a sad group for Wes Clark to be involved with as it alleged in nature ALL our troops cry to be and stay away from icky warfare generally, and laughed when Howard Dean sent a DNC e-petition asking for e-names (don't only 11% get news from internet these days?).
But an Obama campaign PSA today via email told me Bush had no reasons to go to Iraq, and falsely accused Hussein of sponsoring WMD and terror, so that's why Democrats first ever thought about removing Hussein and the world distrusts us; to that PSA I replied:
"It's getting boring with artful Democrats...Team Obama up next. Well, his team tells me Iraq had no Qaedans, Afghanistan did, yet Obama said neither Qaeda nor planes were involved in 911, either...not easy to say words of the agent are those of the principal re Team Obama.
Then, I remember some foundling waif, a mere Bonesman himself, who made much in a prior campaign as a Democrat that George W. Bush KNEW he was going to Iraq even before 911...um, looks like due to now Turban Durbin, U.N., and similar calls for Hussein's removal tour de force accrued whether or not. It would appear Qaeda just stitched Iraq invasion into its usual pastiche of malarkey why it is "justified" for 911 inter alia.
Well, Qaeda remains amongst the scum of the earth who don't like free trade or democracy, even for other Muslims any day of the week, even Iranians. But recently Iran's Alibabajihad has said he wants to take over Iraq by sole happenstance when the USA leaves, whether or not Bush or Obama or the man in the moon are next President.
In sum, as fog of rodomontades clears, it seems big deal...Bush added the likelihood of terror support and WMD pursuit to a massive list of Durbin, Democrat, and United Nations calls for Hussein's removal without need or mention of terror support or WMD pursuit; Bush went to rid the world of a dictator Durbin, Democrats, and the world wanted gone, and when he did opportunistic parasites seized on that like they do over a thousand billion other "reasons" on any day."
And as to Wes Clark's surrogates telling me our troops are crybaby underachievers, I replied:
Going by the ... PSA from VoteVets, the Wes Clark adjunct which one links to under WESPAC's "Stop Iran War", it appears you see that Bush you see is aggressing Iran...yessir, obey VoteVets, elect a Clinton-Obama White House, put ol' Wes and his vets in, and Iran's Alibabajihad, Putin, Chavez, and the global gang will join hands with us singing "All You Need Is Love"...now obey the cult of personality in all things, including saying it's BUSH who uses war as distraction, as anything Hillary or other non-Conservatives try to ram through Congress institutionalizes whatever voters don't like.
Myself, I say Kudos to Bush and Petraeus for the progress made, and it's the fact that Clark and VoteVets are shoo-ins for 2008 that's causing Alibabajihad, Putin, etcetera to slam democracy in their own nations, not "fear of McCain or Bush"...come on, do ANY of those sort say they'll cow to the USA and give us greater trade traction, or at least ease up on their own folks, if "appeasers" flood all USA government?
When Wes Clark et al were able to say it was mostly a civil war from one-time facts, fine; but facts on the ground and otherwise HAVE changed."
This would be my personal opinion as a USA national first, a traditional Conservative second, and all else last.