I was sitting here musing over one PSA from Obama's campaign, which represents in part that sure we must bring 911 terrorists abroad to justice, only we've got to understand so much of the world hates us (i.e., the Muslim world, yet that is a distortion) so we have to be more tender to such yocks' concerns over globalization ( i.e., adopt the bin Laden anti-globalization view: no free trade, no diversity of commodity suppliers or producers, nothing but autocratic collectivized rule, and no meaningful vote tallies...oh dear, that wouldn't mean it's ME who sounds like a problem to non-Conservatives just for praising Buckley and Hayek, and supporting our troops/PATRIOT at all times, would it?). Hey, at least in that PSA Team Obama if not the Senator himself tells me that planes WERE used on 911 WTC attacks and that the Binster's pukes did it.

 

Then I got to muse over a new MoveOn email droning on about how, you see, Petraeus HAS lied; er, see, he's, ah, oh...what's that phrase Ted Kennedy service marked....oh, yes: Petraeus has cherry-picked facts, you see; so MoveOn begs the recipient to write letters to editors instanter saying it's USA presence in Iraq that's causing all this here terror trouble, ya see. THEN rushes in a PFAW PSA, telling me Xavier college raised $28K to fight Ann Coulter...what was the name of the once-ruling German chap who said "who has the youth has the future"? 

 

Just as my eyes were glazing over, I became aware that now Hillary Clinton has bashed Lou Dobbs, calling him a bigot opposed to immigrants. Nuestra dama de la salvación nos dirigirá progreso...Dios salva el Hilldog, viva la revolucion!

 

Actually, even many immigrants know what Dobbs means: Legal immigrants are welcome, even legal immigrants don't like just any old killer type or felon set up on the QT in sanctuary cities, and if immigrants are fleeing collectivization of capital, people, or both in their own lands, or company or socialized housing, why would they embrace it here or elsewhere...especially if it's from a non-free trade stance to boot? And has Hillary given up being champion of "make every vote count"?

 

The usual pundits may say this or that person in this or that party is ahead or behind, yet the same pundits spent all of 2003 saying Howard Dean was such a "factor" primaries were a mere formality to his unanimous crowning, told us it would be Kerry by a nose in 2004, and so many things like that.

 

While there's no cause for Conservative complacency, it would appear the current level of Democrat and non-Conservative racket is just to be contrary for argument's sake, sort of like offering (insisting upon?) the same kind of society funsters like Laden, Jintao, Chavez, Obrador, Mushareff, Iran's Alibabajihad, and apparently now Putin adopt the more it looks like their way WILL be the USA way.

 

Noting that non-Conservatives haven't even suggested we could have our own farms and businesses and independents, passing our own currency amongst ourselves, as when totally isolated in the nineteenth century, and seeing folks like F.A. Hayek were right, I continue to support free trade and remain a William F. Buckley Jr Conservative.