While my wife and I were still happy residents of Illinois, my mother-in-law was amongst the last of those to get a reverse mortgage without a pot to you-know-what-in. At that time, 2007, despite numerous attempts by many over the years to get her to move or at least invest in new septics, drain fileds, a roof, and so on, she got about $200K as a reverse mortgagee...no strings attached, and with full knowledge of the major lender of the state of her home. See, it's what people in this podunk area refer to as "North Al-ban-NAY" Oregon, an imaginary fiefdom of has-beens who like Nora Desmond treat all as Max the chauffeur; this is indulged by local officials et al as the only alternative is "regular Albany" and its registered domestic EIC/SSI style non-workers.

So "Mom" 'couldn't" leave this "baronial" area, and although in a shambles a bank gave her untethered maximum equity funds, again in 2007. She died August 27, 2008...the next year, at age 78! The house? Exactly the same as it was at time of the loan, all cash gone on "flings"! In May 2009, my wife and I relocated to Oregon and invested much energy into at least cleaning the house up before the one-year to sell deadline arrived; there then at the last was a couple who'd buy the place, but didn't like what the lender held firm upon as a minimum purchase price. See, to the bank, it's the LAND that's for sale, not the incidental sty, so there...firm, period! The couple, and neighbors, have always asked US out of the kindness of hearts to invest not less than $200K into repairs, so that people can buy it from the bank and leave us with zero for the effort; these neighbors, such bigshots of North AlbanNAY and all, many of whom scold with "I have a degree, you know!!!" (ONLY one, so long ago?) as if we're trailer trash, have thrown rocks at car windows, ripped mailboxes on posts to shreds, and so on as my wife and I only keep up grounds and cleanliness in a manner better than all neighbors apparently tolerated for years and years. That is, desperate Nora Desmonds will stoop to anything to protect their interests in an area of declining tax values...don't see many Desmonds investing in their own pro rata, by the way.

 

As it stands now, in November 2011 the lender finally moved for actual Court foreclosure; it's been granted, but the lender keeps treating US as if nothing's changed, we can access the place if we need to whenever, as long as we have all the usual bonds and insurances (which we do); I checked last week and found this is because the Oregon Dept. Of Revenue and IRS have joined the suit asking the bank for all kinds of life property taxes and income taxes the woman never paid, and a final order has not yet been entered. No realtor nor we can now sell the property, so we've been waiting to see if anything at all will cause the bank to lower its price so we could purchase the home (built by my wife's father) and repair it; however, the most omniscient demigods of North AlbanNAY, degrees and all, tell US we're now in for hard times as long as we come around and don't repair all anyway; oh, and Desmonds...even I have tried to get the property condemned by local and County officials, to no avail, as they "prefer sales to knockdowns" especially in such a "toney"(?) neighborhood...even if it's public record the area IS all designated a failed septic tank area, for instance. The Desmonds all now say 'tis my wife and blocking all sales via asking for a too-high price.

 

Okay, numbskull jerks whom obviously benefit society via staying only in North AlbanNAY, my wife and I ARE stopping so much as caretaker roles there, and will gladly settle elsewhere...how your stupid jaws will drop when DEEDEEDEE, it becomes painfully apparent after us that the lender IS the cause of the idiotic purchase price, after all! Oh well, with your  degrees and all, I'm sure you'll find it in YOUR hearts to fix it up so the poor bank can get whatever it wants; bye-bye, chumps!

 

So to all those out there who find themselves "estates" of dog reverse mortgage property, do yourselves a favor, save yourself grief; banks look at the "pit'" as LAND, they have THEIR unbendable prices, and all the "estate" neighbors will do is make your life miserable as if YOU hold the responsibility for stabilizing their obviously dicey neighborhood.  

I've been hearing in the news and on blogs more about big increases to the number of so-called stay-at-home dads; also, there appears online support for those no-kids-ever, non-working yet able-bodied stay-at-home HUSABANDS.

I'm now 52, so let me apply the same justice to stay-homes I am told by the same government faces (and those wholly politically cultivated by them) shall ETERNALLY apply to men from "my generation"(?, what, industrialists, workers, capitalists?): stay-at-home able-bodied men can ALWAYS find employment no matter how tough the economy, they shall have no mercy or sympathy for their joblessness, they shall never qualify for any sort of assistances whatsoever, and they shall always be at-risk for government entering into their marital relationships to be jailed as deadbeats, financial VAWA-busers, or both no matter how eductaed their wives or otherwise. In some cases, for "refusal" to change, they may be sterilized.

 

Now, notice no actual crimes or such have to apply; you just have to be a male of any race or origin around my age or older to have this curse on you for life. May I add that there is no analogue to stay-at-home man's EIC, food stamps, housing costs, kid healthcare, and so on available to us "cursed" men?

 

Unless everyone from Obama to Bush to Daley to Emmanuel to Kitzhaber to Heiser to Mayoresses ad infinitum really are just trying to eliminate one type of male in favor of an easily-cowed Police State run by rather effete parasites and populated by registered domestic seed packages with the self-respect  of less than serfs, I would continue to feel that ANY man who can live as a stay-at-home is a coward, parasite, slacker, or worse, and ought not be "cause" to force other men into feeling they have to say it's okay with them on pain of FaceBook cooties and worse Socialist propaganda. I believe those who would criticize me as same if it even appeared my wife loaned me a penny would agree that any man a woman or government supports should be harshly dealt with.

So it appears the military as everyday police in America is about to happen for the first time in the nation's history, all because from now on just about anybody may be one of those who helped Qaida pull off 9/11 (see, e.g., http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/ndaa-goes-into-effect-this-week-lets-block-it/question-2484761/?page=1&postId=78639969#post_78639969); this HAS to be the reason as authority government uses is the 2001 AUMF against those responsible for 9/11 specifically, simply, and exclusively.

I of course applauded Chicago Mayor Richard J. Daley back in 1968 for using heavy POLICE power against Convention rioters, because these rioters were known to me AS A NATIVE CHICAGOAN to pipe bombing, trashing buildings, yaddayaddayadda all to get mere citizens to listen to them and to threaten violence against citizens unless Daley obeyed. But you know, at least then such power was used but ONLY UPON PEOPLE AT THE MOMENT ACTUALLY PLANNING OR DOING SOME CALAMITOUS ACT(S)! Old Daley didn't bludgeon everyday people "just in case". 

So if our government wants to use troops to spray rioters and jump-out-at-you actual robbers, fine. But if our government is going to use things like: the unemployed sound in 2001 QaidaCruits abroad; critics sound in 2001 Qaidan displeasure with policy; only those demanding work are aggressive enough to maybe do maybe something maybe one day; and so on in such natures, well, then I have to say in such latter case the following video would be the best condensed description of 2012 America I could think of:

(Note: As this is written in TH post editor, at the moment hyperlink inclusion appears disabled but the links work if copied and used as URL addresses)

 live in a managed economy, such that it's just going to be every Mayor, Council member, State Governor/Legislator, County Board member, and Federal Official essentially runs a glorified housing project; 80% or so of whatever natives/immigrants on any day will not be working/conducting own business for their home/car/utilities/education/children/anything else; 20% or so will have the guise of "working" as cogs in image/media/staples management of the masses; law and Constitutions will be whatever those in world office agree amongst themselves without qualifications.

 

Now, does ANYBODY mention that a major stumbling block to ANY economic "recovery" is that since Ronald Wilson Reagan, every President including Obama and his GOP challengers as would-be Presidents have specifically by Executive Orders kept actual CURRENCY to a very low (almost non-existant) level? Oh, credit from China or blah blah blah that apparently will stretch to infinity to repay; say, maybe if e-verify kept more ferreners from working jobs that don't exist or endure; say, all these malls across America despite "stimuli" keep failing for lack of patronage simple but that's just poor salespeople, yeah....on and on the patently inane subjects forming "real deal" campaigns go.

 

The truth is, NO American or immigrant on ANY EIC ($4/YR per child, no need to spend on child, and a couple can still qualify for this earning over $49,000/yr), SNAP, unemployment extension, home forbearance, welfare, and so forth WANTS to work! When threatened with cuts, they first then...after YEARS of silently pocketing bailouts of their own...yelp on and on about "bailouts", "work", and "jobs"; they even miss in their own propaganda that no nation can both have everyone on substituted life income AND have currency to create ANY trade or jobs. Notice too that these people often crow...usually from their own speculation...that government wanted others to blow away so that a new Socialist culture, similar to 1970's France, was arising with the indolent, unconcerned about/better than New Unemployed and their children born in Registered Domestic Partnership (as opposed to repugnant "marriage").

 

In other words, I don't even care if government DOESN'T nilly-willy start tossing Carter-era dollars into the public realm, but come on! Let's not let all these now-yapping slackers, most possessed of incredible egos and "Socialist pecking order primogeniture" at that, keep government from cutting aid and home care and everything else that BY all mall closures, expanding unemployment, and so forth, proves money given to the complacently indolent DOES NOT DRIP ONE IOTA FROM THEM INTO ANYONE ELSE'S BUSINESS OR JOBS!

 

Boo-hoo-hoo: Bush was some dictator, Obama may be a Stalin, and any other rodomontades of the lazy. Maybe so, maybe not, maybe similar. But again, the crybaby lethargic who protest cuts across boards only offer NOT Jeffersonian-style "revolution", just "rumble-rumble-rumble" mutiny and anarchy of the Masses. Indeed, such "keep the freebs coming or else!" masses, on another level, themselves appear to be the BIGGEST oppressors possessed with a fascination for what human will alone could accomplish in governance and economy...a fascination like the one held by Hitler, Stalin, and Castro.

 

Again, everything from public libraries, public free internet, to EIC and beyond SHOULD be cut to nothing so those who WANT to work and be more can compete for limited dollars more honestly.

 

To all the slackers who would then self-identify through not working and "occupying" or beating up passersby like terrorists, when their true colors shine through I could then show them MY real attitude toward asymetrical sluggard bullies, to-wit:

 

 

Ah....IS Newt Gingrich actually sexier and more cogently economically logical today, or is he the same guy nobody liked back after 1994 and his master plan to create a sole Federally dependent economy? Who knows, since SO many Enron to date appear...well...gone now, and so many new no-questions-asked non-Americans have been packed into America, folks who likely have no idea who ANY USA politico is.

 

Will Newt and the same-old-faces GOP save us from those scurvy DEMs who saved us from them? See, Rick Santorum, a Rapture millenialist and 2012 end-of-days hawker himself "raptured" by voters in 2004, or McSame, and so on, ARE the very same people against whom everyone from Howard Dean to Garafolo to Obama would save us from, per their once campaign rhetoric. See, Obamas and such were just at the mercy of King George IV(Bush) and his GOP Congress...like Germans under Hitler, they then said, what COULD they do but "appear" to vote with the GOP and further curry political favors of their own from them?

 

But when the Democrat "Allies" invaded the Bush/GOP "Axis Powers" and overthrew the NEWTZIs, gosh, golly, gee...turns out, guess those GOP boys and Bush DID know how to treat mere humans after all....as a basic bunch of scurvy talking monkeys needing little more than strict contouring of their lives by the State and little else.

 

And now we hear how the GOP promises to save us, not by changing economic architectures or confiscated liberties but on beauty contest agendas, as truly anarchistic and truly parasitic "Occupiers" demand NOT change but re-inclusion to a permanent aid dole!!!!

 

This is the simple error of putting too much hope on the bare outcome of mostly no-trail elections. Here is a good definition of the term "managed economy" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_economy ); see if anything at all sounds familiar to you.

 

I put it for your consideration that although a permanently Federally bailed/outlined housing, automotive, banking, and media/Hollywood are ALWAYS happy with ANYTHING under their Federal "mentors", if no USA politician running for anything from dog catcher to President so much as acknowledges the USA as a managed ecomomy all Homeland Security exists solely to reinforce against all its enemies even if Jurisprudent ones, then it truly doesn't matter which twit wins which office, does it?

 

We didn't need such cashless, industry-free, managed inclusion in society back during the Cold War, Viet Nam, Korea, WWII, or WWI, we had plenty of immigrants from EVERYWHERE back then, lots of liberty, very low domestic risks, and oh yeah...no managed economy.  

We know what USA media, leaders, and mass slackers think of duty, honor, struggle, progress, emotions, indeed, humanity: "Bah! We're all talking monkeys, bow to the ones in office and fun-fun-fun until I take your nanners from YOU!!! PARTAYYYYYYY, 'cuz it's too hard to pry myself off fat, sugar, and media images!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!".

 

On a brighter note, recently the Russian Ministry of Defence indeed inspired the spirit of its people, and paid outstanding homage to Russia's history-long contribution to human souls, humanity, and spirit...despite, like ANYWHERE, occasional dark time; if only the USA and others could today produce THIS kind of image, one that would make every person truly proud of their land: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozq-XfBv3Y8 .

 

Sadly, we in the USA seem to either be total garbage except for politicians/their orthodoxies, or we are super-happy to snivel in abyssmal mediocrity even if no leader DID "oppress" us. Thus, why I wholeheartedly endorse every type of cutting to handout/bailout progarms now on the books...it's not instilling progress as the Constitution and Declaration intended, is un-American, and anti-spirit to the rest of the world. 

I agree with the old Soviets only insofar as if, as with the modern United States and so many more, you're going to have a Socialist ECONOMY where both income and dole are wholly measured by the State (with or usually without merit), whether one works or is on the dole, who needs anybody who EXPECTS a paycheck regardless of productivity or usefulness (e.g., minimum union workers or statutorily prescribed worker levels), or EXPECTS clock-hugging tolerance, or EXPECTS eternal "safety nets" once cut from redundant jobs, or EXPECTS handouts from a "mommy State" as if to forever have a life of play and kids simply paid for by Federal funds, or so on ad infinitum?

Really, even though most Socialist economies run such that up to 20% are public/private workers/business people having equity/rights with the up to 80% rest in public-paid housing and on a dole (necessarily therefore with fewer rights due to doctrine of "idle hands"), those on the dole actually form their own redundancy and recurrently think no more of other humans...even those similarly situated to themselves...as other than expendible competitors for pantry fare, SNAP, EIC, 1.5 to 5 year whole lifestyle welfare plans, et al. And if you DON'T keep handing to them as they request they threaten to become anarchistic if random in their violence against officials/people who won't just hand more to them (which insofar as that makes sense of the April 2009 DHS reports on "Left" and "Right").

 

As from Newt Gingrich's 1994 "Contract With America" to date all government acta regardless of partisanship has shown us, the USA indeed IS and SHALL remain a Socialist economy no mere human or group(s) thereof can control or re-define participation within. Obviously, keeping people on doles does not ever keep unemployment from sliding as the doled do not want more than wheels, health care, tons of food/snacks, and constant multimedia entertainment...COULD be why only fast-food jobs seem to ever be created. And, well, just HOW MANY on doles ever DO join forces for more than simply keeping easy cash flowing? I know many do, but compared to the mass of social parasites, we're in the minority.

 

The old Soviets didn't like slackers, and neither did apolitical people coincidentally within their nation. Who does? If those on the dole won't volunteer even in their own food pantries, and act like spoiled brats "pulling lame" to milk health care/reverse mortgage and such as pretended "victims" only when the party's over, then I agree with the old Soviets that our great Socialist economy (and ANY nation's) can only be healed through helping sustain just those who have positive ideas.

 

In closing, look at this old parody which simplifies the issue, at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hCCCRAcTAA&feature=related , and TELL me you don't agree with the sentiment yourself! It's the same kind of logic that would disagree with Congress accepting HUGE campaign checks from a Hollywood it bails out and wants draconian laws to protect as Socialism advances; paying to insulate do-nothings from those on doles who otherwise do nothing is "Uzbeck".  

On this day Obama, like his last two predecessors yearly, will step out and say the economic State of the Union is STRONG blah blah blah as all trained seals in both Houses and SCOTUS ravenously applaud, I'd like to say I for one DO recommend ALL government stop ALL infinite extensions of ALL handouts.

 

People say banks, auto makers, and media/Hollywood are bailed out...but notice that only squeaky wheels harp on that, offering no further insight other than to demand all government bail THEM out in toto for perpetuity? It's like most Occupy Wall Street harpies and their cronies DO want nothing more out of life than a ghetto existence, only not caused by government but THEMSELVES.

 

Ghettos in the USA of yore tended to be trailer park type places, projects, or barrios, knowing no limitations to race or creed of their occupants and denizens; it wasn't who inhabitants were that defined the ghetto lifestyle, it was HOW it commonly existed among players. Every ghetto had people who didn't...and in fact, in a number of noisy cases, won Court rights to REFUSE...work; they didn't need to be married to have children; they got food stamps, EIC-type credits, housing free or on special government-authored bank programs, this credit and that credit (usually on high rates); they really did let their neighborhoods deteriorate on grounds "the man" and not they owned it;the interests of tv/movies/arrested development consumed ghetto life; life was very cheap therein and all religion a joke; pantries and free food abounded; people killed each other just to be "head rooster" of a block or because they were from another place...and so on. You can Google this type of data, or visit large libraries, and so on to verify ghetto life as it was lived.

 

What do we have now? Despite New Urban appearance in many cases, ghetto "sensibilities" and hatreds and snottiness amid a desire of ghetto wannabes...all races, all types...to be on permanent unemployment extensions WITH COL raises, they want ever-expanding stamps/EIC/similar free cash for each child they simply bring into ANY even ghetto existence, they believe sports/movies/media/"who got a parkin' space aheada me?"/pedestrians on roadways are cause for bloddletting, they don't seek out education on their own, they think they're due free health care for getting fat with its consequences as indolent eating hogs, and the ONLY time you EVER hear ONE of them whine is when you suggest maybe, just maybe, the tax/work/worry-free lives of such people be paid for by THEM themselves, like the rest of us are some kind of NAZIS trying to keep sloths from being what God or nature created them to be. Otherwise, they're off for more tatoos, coffehouses, wine bars, sporting events, dvds, 3d video games, and other such "mature" stuff as they breed and eat.

 

I know many in government really don't care a tinker's cuss about my or anyone else's ability to function...they NEVER did. But just like it's wrong to club one of us down into hamburger or have us shot by police just for daring to ask WHERE or HOW we can keep on being active and self-sustaining, it's wrong to keep a bunch of people who don't like government or industrious people on the permadole...and there are more industrious wannabes and government officials than the combined welfare wannabes (including HECM as extra dole).

 

In a democracy a majority of reasonable views come together and vote together on specifics; on cutting unemployment extensions and limiting ALL welfare to truly temporary help in tragedies, I say to me it seems more people live without government hand-holding than do, those who do don't contribute to economies or otherwise through themselves and for no good reasons, and thus it would be most democratic to hear the many and put money where NOBODY can just be underwritten for life as competition for best ideas again becomes the standard of USA industry.

Remember when George Walker Bush, affectionately known as Dumbya and immediately preceding Obama, said he needed power to combine agencies to secure against rampant jobless immigration, keep us safe from terror, promote the international trade base for USA companies, yadda yadda yadda? Nothing went wrong when Bush had the authority from all the same multi-partisan faces running for no-trail re-election today, did it? I mean, only lazy, drug-addicted people Breaking Bad lost homes or jobs, lived on years of parasitic unemployment extensions, home care, Medicare, and the like, the majority of the USA being financially well-off folks even if say Oregon STILL has to pay for their children's health care and even if the IRS has to issue $3,000 plus per child as EIC credits on tax forms even if no taxable income is claimed.

 

Well, now, Obama has just "progressively pioneered" the concept of review-free Presidential agency consolidation, this time to do the same as under Bush but only "stimulate international trade for USA products" substituted for headline rather than "defend borders"...that is, Bushspeak only re-arranged. Thus, Obama really proposes little more than the same old same old only as if it doesn't yet exist and if first now allowed and he then given re-election to "shepherd" what is "incubating", all will be rosy tomorrow.

 

Um, I hate to be this way, because I know every person running for anything anywhere this year is the same face or someone beholden to the same face crowd (e.g., nobody likes Chicago Mayor Rich Daley, Obama/Clinton aide Rahm Emanuel replaces him, to this day all Rahm does is dedicate more and more public buildings to, as he says, 'OUR Mayor, Mayor Daley')...but Obama HAS been running all trade/economy things as unified already; for years, each of his Cabinet Secretaries has been able to issue their own PRESIDENTIAL EXECUTIVE ORDERS on order of OBAMA; not one person running for re-election anywhere has complained, and they're thus satisfied with the fact Russia/China dropped the USA dollar as world standard a year ago, satisfied with more housing and reverse mortgages as a way to go, satisfied with the economy, satisfied with public service levels, satisfied with all the universe indeed.

 

No, streamlining agencies is a sucker bet. Speaking of Congressional incumbents also looking to "help USA trade and jobs", notice ALL they come up with are things like SOPA, PROTECT, yadda yadda on guise same will protect USA jobs, industry, sales, and so on due to online piracy. If only Congress allows the now Gestapo/Savak/KGB-like DHS fortress to yank all internet on whim, proof or not, then we'll be awash in jobs...so full steam ahead building MORE housing as cash-heavy workers are on the near horizon after November elections.

 

Um, Congressional wannabes? You and your Presidential hopefuls all trash "20th Century ways of business", but most of you have been there since Dumbya a decade ago started the Office of the 21st Century Workforce within the Labor Department, and according to all of you what we have today is the GOAL of the office...to be as different from the 20th Century as you can get us.

 

Thus, rather than re-styreamlined agencies and idiotic internet laws, wouldn't it be nice to set about incentivizing towns, cities, and states to have 20th century style manufacturing, banking, shipping, etcetera, which existed even before the 20th Century and all its "warts" and "progress"? 

 

I mean, how smart need anyone be to see that without places to do/be/make anything at all, there's not much to interfere with by having it all made someplace else to begin with? After all, even those foreign powers who must be mentioned as set in stone re trade themselves actually MAKE and SHIP things, and would seem to be invasive of their jurisdictions to say "we who do nothing demand to police you abroad to ensure you're not pirating things none of our citizens make".

 

I agree trade needs help, but 2012 doesn't seem to be the year any incumbent or cash-set wannabe/celeb meaningfully broaches the fact we need things and services TO trade, invest in, and earn income by...I mean, handouts/food banks/unemployment/reverse mortgages and all are neato bazeeto ab initio, but dudes: they run out, and bills they pay are of a recurrent nature and NEVER stop; say, maybe if you made EVERYBODY a bailed out business like the happy bank, auto, Hollywood, and media "too big to fail" types who go through motions on your nickle and spoon-fed stories, it wouldn't matter if we had trade because more might think they actually have dignity in doing SOMETHING other than borrowing/begging.

 

Shucks...since 2006, not even Obama has wanted CURRENCY to be included in the reports on money supply, so yeah, it MUST be that bad and unfixable by mere photo ops and partisan ad libs.

Once again, the same old faces on all sides, Mayors to Legislatures to Congress to President, the ones who presided over ALL the ongoing gunk that brings us to today without relent have taken stage and tried to convince a largely no-voting-trail public that all incumbents (past or present) ARE the only ones we WANT to choose from! After all, Newt "Women Want Him/Men Want To BE Him" Gingrich led the charge to MAKE everything like it now is back in 1994...must've not been thrown out, no...he went on well-earned hiatus; just ask STILL bailed-out media or Hollywood, speaking of Newtonian economics.

 

See, we are all too stupid and lazy to WANT to work; we relish new homes built for the sole purpose of shoring up HECM reverse mortgage rake-ins (until the first tax bill is missed or it runs out), we relish institutionalized SNAP/food stamps/pantries/food banks for the veiled food rationing they are, and like most French under National Socialists, besides that and lard...er, health...care, what more COULD anyone want? It's the best of the freebies of old housing project cultures, the only cost personal equity and life under permanent martial law (SOPA, PATRIOT, DHS, inter alia ad infinitum). 

 

This is why we don't care anyone running for anything is SSDD; Burrhus Skinner WAS right, as were Ayn Rand and cohort Alan Greenspan...we're just tropist-mongering talking primates, we just want to grunt, reproduce, eat, look at images and lay around, and unlike the real evolved ones (incumbent office holders) we deserve no pretenses to education or social ambition.

 

Why, who's even bothered by Salem Oregon ManGod (every time he speaks, local media/Governors/Mayors/Legislators cave to him) Kevin Mannix (who, um, PRACTICED running three times prior before all the voter foreclosure/job tossouts) now crowing how come this Fall, it'll be "the voters' will" you can blast to death NON-VIOLENT people who so much as trespass on your lawn! Yep, watch uninvited Jehovahs Witnesses, Avon ladies, and cookie-peddling Girl Scouts, not to mention men who want to get painting or tree work (the Mannix initiative IS for real: see http://www.statesmanjournal.com/article/20120106/NEWS/201060351/Mannix-s-initiative-raises-question-deadly-force ).

 

Like all his office-holding playmates across the USA, ol' Kevin knows how to handle the stress of little people...blast 'em  down, and that's available to bailed-out banks who find "squatters" past foreclosure, for example. Keep Hope Alive, Don't Stop Thinkin' About Obama Or Tomorrow, Go Ducks, Go Cubs, You Go Girl...our incumbents and SSDD "challengers" are taking care of business!!!!!

 

Myself, I'll keep figuring out why Europeans and so many others are singing post-Communist Russia's praises instead of freedom-filled, land-o-opportunities USA's (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGGrUSqwo0Y&feature=related ).

I'm Prussian by ancestry, which in my case means German and Russian background.

 

Here for you all are two songs you may recognize; please enjoy them and remember no matter the good Godly messenger, it's not the messenger as much as the rational method.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lk-csYQe3dw     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6d__9tmLv3Y

 

To the memories of Jesus Christ, every good man and woman who ever had the same message no matter faith or humanism, Bing Crosby, Fulton Sheen, and William Frank Buckley, Jr..

Have you heard the latest from those progressive folk, known individually as cross-platform incumbents and collectively as Obama With Coattails?

It seems that Team Obama kicks off 2012 campaigning with an open contest...strictly limited to professional graphic artists...to come up with a bunch of posters wherein the artists...NOT Team Obama...imagine how Obama and incumbents lapping at Obama's coattails  ARE producing plenty of good jobs and cash and so forth for people who aren't incumbents or graphic artists. If you think that's an exaggeration, that Obama and all-levels incumbents have no need to invent their own success not otherwise obvious, you can read for yourself a recnt protest by the Graphic Artists Guild chastising Obama's campaign for said propagandizing: https://www.graphicartistsguild.org/typeroom/assets/uploads/advocacy/GAG_Obama_for_America_contest.pdf .

 

Here's one for Obama, and all incumbents who say America does nothing but grow status quo; it may not be "poster", but it DOES seem to capture the essence of today's American culture: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3pgaaSdsXc .

 

That said, let me close out this year's blogging with a seasonal tiding for all those putting on the annual December nice faces: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WruJVa9H3Aw .  

Ah, the memories of former (and in one's case, late) GOP Oregon Senators Bob Packwood and Mark O. Hatfield, who when demanding more opportunities for people back in the 90's suddenly had a pack of women materiallize and "suddenly" as a "random assembly not knowing each other" chime in that DECADES ago, Bob and Marko had severly and constantly grope them...oh yes, Bob Dole then had just previously demanded they be drummed out of the Senate for not voting GOP as Dole dictated, just prior to groping allegations (which later evaporated).

 

Recall that in his second term Bill "Don't Stop Thinkin' About Tomorrow" Clinton was being drubbed relentlessly with the Monica Lewinsky malarkey after calling for more for Americans...and Billy originally being from Hope, Arkansas first elected 1992 and working for rellief from the Daddy Bush years. Gosh darn gropers!

 

Then there was Al Sharpton...ptooey, tax cheat and "possible" groper; Roman Catholic English translator of the 1994 Vatican catechism...no, don't listen to Father John Corapi S.O.L.T., as earlier this year while he was calling for more humanity in general, wouldn't you know, some untested yahoo scribbled out a complaint of his previously being a druggie and molestering her...so effective is the power of mere "cooties" being called even if nothing comes of it, EWTN immediately yanked the good Father and his order relieved him of all duties "pending".

 

Um, who else spoke of poverty and/or economic and personal growth options in modern times?  Oh yes....Democrat John Edwards; naw, nobody could like him as he cheated on his dying wife; thank God Cheney won over THAT loser! Good God, people, aren't you YET learning the pattern here? Better a tyrant, even, than the best person for the job "except" (and note the irony of who's "better"...see, it's more important to act like Ray Milland's character in 'Dial M For Murder', because it's not what you're like or actually do/don't do, it's how well you get people to BELIEVE someone behaves based on imagery and appeal to tropisms...no wonder so many media and pols love the radical behaviorism founded by B.F. Skinner!).

 

Let's see here, it's coming up on 2012. Mitt Romney? Naw, Mormon/gropes/etcetera. Rick Perry? Naw, real unpopular Texan even if his State gives the Feds guff about ordering Texas to cut food stamps "or else". Um, several-term, Viet Nam vet, 2008 Presidential Obama opponent John McCain? Oh, no no no...see, it's just come to the "rememberization" of a woman that two decades ago, see, MadDog McCain was regularly doing naughty things with her privates; represented by the hardly questionable Gloria Allred and these being the best of economic times (where NOBODY would jump at $$$$$ for saying/doing ANYTHING except as DHS warns us they will), if all of us don't jump on Facebook and Twitter to give McCain mega-cooties based on hot air not Court facts (or worse, even if no facts ARE real), what will people who control our jobs or handouts think of US? Why, it works so well, who protests anything for fear of being taken as one of those Occupy Wall Street folks who DO just want their own gravy-train habdouts back? (No wonder so many towns "can't" move these slackers but are tight on the rest of us...see the "guilt by association" play incumbents can insulate themselves with?)

 

The point is, whatever your impression of a Supreme universal is, if that deific entity itself ran for office, the Socialist machine would arise with one putrifaction after another against it if such entity said and did anything different than the status quo.

 

Once again, 2009-date bailed-out media...always the same screen faces over decades, always reporting up/down, never tethered to changing anything itself...together with incumbents of all parties at all levels in all States are trying to convince us that if STALIN were their candidate and promised nothing but final solutions and pogroms to cure America once and for all, gosh darn it, of COURSE November 2012 no-trail voting will be authentic that people chose Stalin over even the best other plan(s) because everybody else had a sudden case of cooties.

 

Oh, one more thing...whoever that "Stalin" might be, if installed, same would also NOT then have to acknowledge the problems, issues, pr concerns of all those folks who would have voted otherwise "but for"...heck, as the now decades-old mantra goes, those who vote for someone with cooties are VAWA-busing, child-molesting,secret druggie,wife-cheating,robbing,blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah themselves, and impliedly lose their jobs/occupations/homes due to THAT, NOT statist agendas!

 

Could be why this past weekend, the Salem Oregon Statesman-Journal reported (questionably THIRD-term) Gov. John Kitzhaber (D) just kicks back and says he's devoting full gubernatorial 2012 energy to nothing more than making Oregon's forests the model for all in the USA. "The Kitz" has seen the light, and will do whatever the Feds ask him to...just like any other incumbent, anywhere, because so many continue for now at least to believe modern campaigns are more than omnipartisan vents for the masses rather than just plain being flak blankets to blunt any change at all, anywhere, ever.

Ever notice how it seems only the weirdest fringe elements get coverage, even when it's coincidence they're as affected by events as anyone else?

 

Get ready for another Clinton, I mean Bush, I mean Edwards/Kerry, I mean Obama, I mean Kitzhaber...oh, ptoeey, I mean all incumbents will save us election!

 

This video pretty much tells why all is perfect in the USA thank you, and only filth would suggest otherwise: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BRFeQlWEB4 .

If there's one thing that can even make Texas Governor Perry look bad, it's mentioning that America needs to create jobs; he was shot at so fast by all sides after saying that a few debates back, you'd think he was John Edwards in 2004!

 

As this video spoof suggests, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7_5nwZOVKQ , GOP and Democrats alike are consonant that there's no need for unemployment insurance or jobs programs in today and tomorrow's USA...trust them on that, as they have video and film to spin.

 

Boo! Or should one say rather, boo-hoo-hoo?